Optimizing SIA: discourses in South African SIA and DRA practice

References

• Arce-Gomez, A., Donovan, J. D., & Bedggood, R. E. (2015). Social impact assessments: Developing a consolidated conceptual framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50(2015), 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp, I., & Lombard, A. (2017). Can social impact assessment contribute to social development outcomes in an emerging economy? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 36(2), 173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucamp, I., Retief, F. P., & King, N. D. (2018). The social dimensions of environmental management. In N. D. King, H. A. Strydom, & F. P. Retief (Eds.), Environmental management in South Africa (3rd ed., pp. 1177–1212). Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp, I., Woodborne, S., Perold, J., Bron, A., & Aucamp, S.-M. (2011). Looking beyond impact assessment to social sustainability. In F. Vanclay & A. M. Esteves (Eds.), New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances (pp. 38–57). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp, I. C. (2015). Social impact assessment as a tool for social development in South Africa: An exploratory study (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pretoria, Pretoria, SA.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, J. T., & Taylor, C. N. (2011). Ethical issues and dilemmas. In F. Vanclay & A. M. Esteves (Eds.), New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances (pp. 96–113). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, T. (2007). Guideline for involving social assessment specialists in EIA processes. Prepared for the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning. Western Cape Province, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C. J. (2000). Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction. London: Arnold Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C. J. (2010). How is environmental conflict addressed by SIA? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2010), 293–301.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, D. R., Harris, C. C., McLaughlin, W. J., & Nielsen, E. A. (2003). A participatory approach to social impact assessment: The interactive community forum. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(3), 367–382.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. A. (1997). Social impact assessment: Method and experience in Europe, North America and the developing world. London: ULC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. A. (2001). Social impact assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, 128(2001), 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezuidenhout, H. (2009). An improved social impact evaluation framework for the completion of SIA section during the environmental impact assessment process for residential developments in South Africa (Master’s dissertation). University of Pretoria, Pretoria, SA.
   Google Scholar
• Bowd, R., Quinn, N. W., & Kotze, D. C. (2015). Toward an analytical framework for understanding complex social-ecological systems when conducting environmental impact assessments in South Africa. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 41–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdge, R. J. (2002). Why is social impact assessment the orphan of the assessment process? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20(1), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Burdge, R. J. (2003). Benefiting from the practice of social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(3), 225–229.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2002). Socio-economic impacts: Are they still the poor relations in UK environmental statements? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45(1), 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell, A., & King, K. (2011). Disasters and climate change. In F. Vanclay & A. M. Esteves (Eds.), New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances (pp. 154–167). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). California: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Delport, C. S. L., & Fouché, C. B. (2011). Mixed methods research. In A. S. De Vos, H. Strydom, C. B. Fouché, & C. S. L. Delport (Eds.), Research at grass roots. For the social sciences and human service professions (4th ed., pp. 433–447). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dendena, B., & Corsi, S. (2015). The environmental and social impact assessment: A further step towards an integrated assessment process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108(2015), 965–977.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Gómez, J. A. (2016). Four conceptual issues to consider in integrating social and environmental factors in risk and impact assessments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 56(2016), 113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Pisani, J. A., & Sandham, L. A. (2006). Assessing the performance of SIA in the EIA context: A case study of South Africa. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(2006), 707–724.
   Google Scholar
• Durning, B. (2014). Benefits of coupling environmental management to aid disaster risk reduction and management. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 16(3), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves, A., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves, A. M., & Barclay, M. A. (2011). Enhancing the benefits of local content: Integrating social and economic impact assessment into procurement strategies. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(3), 205–215.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves, A. M., Factor, G., Vanclay, F., Götzmann, N., & Moreira, S. (2017). Adapting social impact assessment to address a project’s human rights impacts and risks. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 67(2017), 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves, A. M., & Vanclay, F. (2009). Social development needs analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: Applications in the minerals industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(2), 137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finsterbusch, K. (1995). In praise of SIA–A personal review of the field of social impact assessment: Feasibility, justification, history, methods, issues. Impact Assessment, 13(3), 22–252.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, L. (2011). The treatment of socio economic impact in environmental impact statements (Master’s thesis). University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes-Biggs, K. (2011). Disaster risk assessment and analysis. Retrieved from www.drrknowledgeshop.co.za
   Google Scholar
• Franks, D. M., & Vanclay, F. (2013). Social impact management plans: Innovation in corporate and public policy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, (2013(43), 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenburg, W. R. (1984). Probabilistic risk assessment and social impact assessment: The need for cross-fertilization. Impact Assessment, 3(2), 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenburg, W. R. (1986). Social impact assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 12(1986), 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M., Nguyen, K. H., & Cutter, S. L. (2015). Integrated research on disaster risk: Is it really integrated? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12(2015), 255–267.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, J., & Heaney, D. (1993). Socio-economic impacts: The poor relations in British environmental impact statements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 36(3), 335–343.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, T., & Fischer, T. B. (2014). Uncovering the factors that can support and impede post-disaster EIA practice in developing countries: The case of Aceh Province, Indonesia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 44(2014), 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, L., & Sandham, L. A. (2014). Social impact assessment: The lesser sibling in the South African EIA process? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 48(2014), 20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment). (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Imperiale, A. J., & Vanclay, F. (2016). Experiencing local community resilience in action: Learning from post-disaster communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 47(2016), 204–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Foundations and approaches to mixed methods research. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (Revised ed., pp. 262–290). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, D. (2011). Understanding the organizational context. In F. Vanclay & A. M. Esteves (Eds.), New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances (pp. 20–35). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, M., Retief, F. P., & Alberts, R. (2018). Integrated environmental assessment and management. In N. D. King, H. A. Strydom, & F. P. Retief (Eds.), Environmental management in South Africa (3rd ed., pp. 1213–1278). Cape Town: Juta Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, L., & Sandham, L. A. (2018). Social impact assessment: Practitioner perspectives of the neglected status in South African SIA. South African Geographical Journal, 100(3), 394–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, L., Sandham, L. A., & Van Niekerk, D. (2019a). SIA and DRA integration: Understanding the discourse. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, L., Sandham, L. A., & Van Niekerk, D. (2019b). Towards integrated social and disaster risk assessment: A South African methodological comparison. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, L., Sandham, L. A., & Van Niekerk, D. (2020). Improved SIA through DRA integration: Lessons from a South African legislative comparison. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(1), 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Compte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 146–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, H., Renn, O., Vanclay, F., Hoffman, V., & Karami, E. (2013). A framework for combining social impact assessment and risk assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43(2013), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Gunn, J. A. E., Bond, A., & Retief, F. (2014). Strengthening impact assessment: A call for integration and focus. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(1), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• NDMC (National Disaster Management Centre). (2016). Conducting comprehensive disaster risk assessments. Part 1: Hazard Identification, Analysis and Prioritisation.
   Google Scholar
• Nwapi, C. (2015). Governance considerations relating to social impact assessments for mining development in African communities. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 17(2), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2009). Effectiveness in social impact assessment: Aboriginal peoples and resource development in Australia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(2), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, J., Bond, A. J., Morrison-Saunders, A., & Retief, F. P. (2013). Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2013(41), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, M. (2010). An integrated model for disaster risk assessment for local government in South Africa (Doctoral thesis). North-West University, Potchefstroom, SA.
   Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Arica). (1998). National environmental management act, no. 107 of 1998. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• Sandham, L. A., Siphugu, M. V., & Tshivandekano, T. R. (2005). Aspects of environmental impact assessment (EIA) practice in the Limpopo Province - South Africa. African Journal of Environmental Assessment and Management, 10(2005), 50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer, J. (2011). Land use change. In F. Vanclay & A. M. Esteves (Eds.), New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances (pp. 171–184). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Slootweg, R., Vanclay, F., & Van Schooten, M. (2001). Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(1), 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Suopajärvi, L. (2013). Social impact assessment in mining projects in Northern Finland: Comparing practice to theory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 42(2013), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Terrapon-Pfaff, J., Fink, T., Viebahn, P., & Jamea, E. M. (2017). Determining significance in social impact assessments (SIA) by applying both technical and participatory approaches: Methodology development and application in a case study of the concentrated solar power plant NOORo I in Morocco. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 66(2017), 138–150.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman, R. A., Olorunfemi, F. B., Awotayo, G. P., Tunde, A. M., & Usman, B. A. (2013). Disaster risk management and social impact assessment: Understanding preparedness, response and recovery in community projects. In Environmental change and sustainability, Chapter 10 (pp. 259–274). IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk, D. (2006). Disaster risk management in South Africa: The function and the activity - towards an integrated approach. Politeia, 25(2), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk, D. (2011). Introduction to disaster risk reduction. Retrieved from www.drrknowledgeshop.co.za
   Google Scholar
• Van Riet, G. (2009). Disaster risk assessment in South Africa: Some current challenges. South African Review of Sociology, 40(2), 194–208.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2006). Principles for social impact assessment: A critical comparison between the international and US documents. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2014a). Introduction. In F. Vanclay (Ed.), Developments in social impact assessment (pp. xv–xxxvi). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2014b). Integration and focus from the perspective of social impact assessment: A response to Morrison-Saunders et al. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(1), 11–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2015). Changes in the impact assessment family 2003–2014: Implications for considering achievements, gaps and future directions. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 17(01), 1550003–1550020.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., & Esteves, A. M. (2011). Current issues and trends in social impact assessment. In F. Vanclay & A. M. Esteves (Eds.), New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances (pp. 3–17). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., Esteves, A. M., Aucamp, I., & Franks, D. (2015). Social impact assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Fargo ND: International Association for Impact Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Vermaak, J., & Van Niekerk, D. (2004). Development debate and practice: Disaster risk reduction initiatives in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 21(3), 555–574.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. H. M., & Ho, W. C. (2015). Roles of social impact assessment practitioners. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50(2015), 124–133.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. In Applied social research methods series (Vol. 5, 3rd). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar