Understanding local actors’ perspective of threats to the sustainable management of communal rangeland and the role of Participatory GIS (PGIS): the case of Vulindlela, South Africa

References

• Altmann, B. A., Jordan, G., & Eva Schlech, E. (2018). Participatory mapping as an approach to identify grazing pressure in the Altay Mountains, Mongolia. Sustainability, 10(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernarda, B. E., Barbosaa, L., & Carvalhoa, R. (2011). Participatory GIS in a sustainable use reserve in Brazilian Amazonia: Implications for management and conservation. Applied Geography, 31(2), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, R. B., Conant, R. T., Sircely, J., Thornton, P. K., & Herrero, M. (2017). Climate change impacts on selected global rangeland ecosystem services. Global Change Biology, 24(3), 1382–1393. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1996). Collaborative management of protected areas: Tailoring the approach to the context, issues in social policy. IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Canevari-Luzardo, L., Bastide, J., Choutet, I., & Liverman, D. (2015). Using partial participatory GIS in vulnerability and disaster risk reduction in Grenada. Climate and Development, 9(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2015.1067593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamber, R. (2006). Participatory mapping and Geographic Information Systems: Whose’ map? Who is empowered and who is disempowered? Who gains and who loses?. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 25(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00163.x
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 22(9), 1253–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. A., & Mutanga, O. (2021). Understanding participatory GIS application in rangeland use planning: A review of PGIS practice in Africa. Journal of Land Use Science, 16(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2021.1882598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. A., Mutanga, O., & Mabhaudhi, T. (2022). Using participatory GIS and collaborative management approaches to enhance local actors’ participation in rangeland management: The case of Vulindlela, South Africa. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.2017269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clack, W. (2018). “Livestock theft: A global and South African perspective”. National red meat producers congress 11 and 12 September 2018: Royal elephant hotel and conference centre pretoria. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327679928_Livestock_Theft_A_Global_and_South_African_Perspective/link/5b9e6a8292851ca9ed0f790a/download, accessed on 10 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, L., & Corbett, J. (2018). Participatory mapping. In Handbook of communication for development and social change: Participatory mapping. Springer: Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8_6-1
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, L., Corbett, J., & Keller, P. (2014). Impact of community-based and participatory mapping. Research funded by a MITACS internship in collaboration with the University of British Columbia Okanagan, the University of Victoria, and the Community Mapping Collaboratory, accessed on 12 November 2021, 10.13140/RG.2.1.4522.5360. http://cgcmc.geog.uvic.ca/sites/cgcmc.geog.uvic.ca/files/Community%20Mapping%20Impact%20Research%20Report%20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Coppock, D. L., Fernández-Giménez M, Hiernaux P, Huber-Sannwald E, Schloeder C, Valdivia C, Arredondo JT, Jacobs M, Turin C, Turner M. (2017). Rangeland systems: Rangeland systems in developing nations: Conceptual advances and societal implications. Springer Series on Environmental Management Springer, E-Book, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J., Cochrane, L., & Gill, M. (2016). Powering Up: Revisiting participatory GIS and empowerment. The Cartographic Journal, 53(4), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1209624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creutzburg, M. K., Halofsky, J. E., Halofsky, J. S., & Christopher, T. A. (2015). Climate change and land management in the rangelands of Central Oregon. Environmental Management, 55(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0362-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, A. S. (2011). Research at grassroots: For the social sciences and human sciences professions. Van Schaik.
   Google Scholar
• Doorewaard, C. (2020). “Livestock Theft: a criminological assessment and sample-specific profile of the perpetrators”. Master of Arts Thesis in Criminology, University of South Africa. http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/26792/dissertation_doorewaard_c_LATEST_VERSION.pdf?sequence=3, Accessed on 11 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Figueriredo, A., Zheng, F., Nellas, J., & Van, G. (2020). Community and participatory mapping in planning: A premier on what community mapping processes is and how they might be useful in participatory planning. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/474dbf1a1f8f491199ad0489877153b9. Accessed on 17 November 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Godde, C. M., Boone, R. B., Ash, A. J., Waha, K., Sloat, L. L., Thornton, P. K., & Herrero, M. (2020). Global rangeland production systems and livelihoods at threats under climate change and variability. Environmental Research Letter, 15(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundumogula, M. (2020). Importance of focus group in qualitative research.The. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(11), 229–302. https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2020/v8/i11/HS2011-082
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Rowley, T., Zwaagstra, H., Harfoot, A., & Clark, M. (2014). Participatory mapping using digital earth tools imagery and open-source GIS in the drylands of Kenya and Tanzania. www.adaconsortium.org/images/publications/Participatory_Mapping_using_Digital_Earth_tools.pdf, Accessed on 23 November, 2022
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, T., & Vogel, C. (2008). Climate change impacts on African rangelands.Rangelands. Rangelands, 30(3), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-501X
   Google Scholar
• Holechek, J. L., Geli, H. M. E., Cibils, A. F., & Sawalhah, M. N. (2020). Climate change, rangelands, and sustainability of ranching in the Western United States. Sustainability, 12(12), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseininia, G., Khachak, P. R., Nooripoor, M., Van Passel, S., & Azadi, H. (2016). Understanding communicational behavior among rangelands’ stakeholders: Application of social network analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(2), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1009975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2020). To move the needle on ending extreme poverty, focus on rural areas. https://www.ifad.org/en/web/latest/-/blog/to-move-the-needle-on-ending-extreme-poverty-focus-on-rural-areas. Accessed on 1 June 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Maluleke, W., & Dlamini, S. (2019). The prevalence of organised cross-border crimes in South Africa: A non-empirical statistical data analysis on stock theft and hijacking of motor vehicles. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 11(1), 116–145.
   Google Scholar
• Maluleke, W., Mokwena, R. J., & Motsepa, L. L. (2016). Rural farmers’ perspectives on stock theft: Police crime statistics. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, 44(2), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2016/v44n2a393
   Google Scholar
• McCall, M. K. (2014). Mapping territories, land resources and rights: Communities deploying participatory mapping/PGIS in Latin America. Revista do Departamento de Geografia – USP, Volume Especial Cartogeo, (spe), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.11606/rdg.v0i0.534
   Google Scholar
• McCall, M. K. (2021). Participatory mapping and PGIS: Secerning facts and values, representation and representativity. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 10(3), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.20210701.oa7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’ governance? Geoforum, 43(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, M. K., & Minang, P. (2005). Assessing participatory GIS for community-based natural resource management: Claiming community forest in cameroon. Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London, 171(4), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2005.00173.x
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, F. (2015). Public participatory GIS. Geography Compass, 9(7), 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman, W. A., Van Wilgen, B. W., & Leslie, A. J. (2021). A review of fire management practices in African Savanna-protected areas. Koedoe- African Protected Area Conservation and Science, 63(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v63i1.1655
   Google Scholar
• Norris, T. B. (2017). Public participation gis, participatory GIS, and participatory mapping. Oxford Bibliographies.
   Google Scholar
• Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orban-Ferauge, F., Aguilar, V., Carmona, A., Daix, N., de Nil, B., Ignacio, J., Alarcon, E., Martinez Martin, J. A., McCall, M. K., Miscione, G., Olivarez, E., Pandan, M., Rambaldi, G., Teruel, R., & Verplanke, J. J. (2011). PGIS: Participatory geographic information systems and land planning: Life experiences for people empowerment and community transformation. Namur University Press (PUN). participatory geographic information systems and land planning life experiences for people empowerment and community transformation.
   Google Scholar
• Panek, J., & Van Heerden, S. (2013). Participatory GIS for water provision and community planning – Case Study Koffiekraal, South Africa. 13th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 201, Albena, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Pausas, J. G., & Keeley, J. E. (2019). Wildfire as an ecosystem service. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(5), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittroff, W. (2011). Rangeland management and conservation in Afghanistan. The International Journal of Environmental Studies, 68(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2011.584474
   Google Scholar
• Polley, H. W., Bailey, D. W., Nowak, R. S., & Stafford-Smith, M. (2017). Ecological consequences of climate change on rangelands. In D. Briske (Ed.), Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges (pp. 229–260). Springer Series on Environmental Management.
   Google Scholar
• Radil, S. M., & Jiao, J. (2016). Public participatory GIS and the geography of inclusion. The Professional Geographer, 68(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2015.1054750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2015). Stakeholder and public involvement in risk governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0037-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandham, L. A., Chabalala, J. J., & Spaling, H. H. (2019). Participatory rural appraisal approaches for public participation in EIA: Lessons from South Africa. Land, 8(150), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8100150
   Google Scholar
• Santhakumari, M., & Sagar, N. (2020). Handbook of environmental materials management: The environmental threats our world is facing today. In C. Hussain (Ed.), Handbook of Environmental Materials Management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3_180-1
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N. (2009). Critical GIScience in Canada in the millennium. The Canadian Geographer, 53(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2009.00250.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwering, A., & Wang, J. (2010). SketchMapia – a framework for qualitative mapping of sketch maps and metric maps. Las Navas 20th Anniversary Meeting on Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, Avila, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Scully-Engelmeyer, K. M., Granek, E. F., Nielsen-Pincus, M., & Brown, G. (2021). Participatory GIS mapping highlights indirect use and existence values of coastal resources and marine conservation areas. Ecosystem Services, 50, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101301
   Google Scholar
• Seidou, O., & Alodah, A. (2018). From top-down to bottom-up approaches to risk discovery: A paradigm shift in climate change impacts and adaptation studies related to the water sector. CSCE Annual Meeting, DM 36-1–DM 36–11. 2018, June, 13 to 16, Fredericton, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, J. (2010). Indigenous fire use to manage Savannah Landscapes in Southern Mozambique. Fire Ecology, 6(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0602043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, P., Garganta, J., Arau´jo, D., Davids, K., & Aguiar, P. (2013). Shared Knowledge or Shared Affordances? Insights from an ecological dynamics approach to team coordination in sports. Sports Medicine, 43(9), 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0070-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavi, I., Barkai, D., Knoll, Y. M., Abu Glion, H., Katra, I., Brook, A., & Zaady, E. (2017). Fire impact on soil-water repellency and functioning of semi-arid croplands and rangelands: Implications for prescribed burnings and wildfires. Geomorphology, 280, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor and Francis Group. (2021). Taylor and Francis journal style guide: Taylor and Francis Group. https://files.taylorandfrancis.com/tf_APA.pdf?, Accessed on 28 November 2022.
   Google Scholar
• United Nation Office for Disaster Risks Reduction (UN-ISDR). (2017). “Words into Action guidelines- national disaster risk assessment: Governance system, methodologies, and use of results”. https://www.unisdr.org/files/52828_nationaldisasterriskassessmentwiagu.pdf. Accessed on 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Verplanke, J., McCall, M. K., Uberhuaga, C., Rambaldi, G., & Haklay, M. (2016). A shared perspective for PGIS and VGI. The Cartographic Journal, 53(4), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1227552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyer, D., Bezzera, J. C., & Vos, A. D. (2019). Participatory mapping and a developing country context: Lessons from of South Africa. Land, 8(134), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8090134
   Google Scholar
• Wyrwoll, P. R., Grafton, R. Q., Daniell, K. A., Chu, H. L., Ringler, C., Lien, L. T. H., Khoi, D. K., Do, T. N., & Tuan, N. D. A. (2018). Decision-making for systemic water risks: Insights from a participatory risk assessment process in Vietnam. Earth’s Future, 6(3), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaehringer, J. G., Llopis, J. C., Latthachack, P., Thein, T. T., & Heinimann, A. (2018). A novel participatory and remote-sensing-based approach to mapping annual land use change on forest frontiers in Laos, Myanmar, and Madagascar. Journal of Land Use Science, 13(1–2), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2018.1447033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar