Sex ratio and sex expression in an urban population of the silver moss, Bryum argenteum Hedw.

References

• Alvarenga LD, Pôrto KC, Zartman CE. 2013. Sex ratio, spatial segregation, and fertilization rates of the epiphyllous moss Crossomitrium patrisiae (Brid.) Müll.Hal. in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Journal of Bryology. 35:88–95. doi: 10.1179/174328213X13662092820316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkan MA. 2016. Sex-specific fungal communities of the dioicous moss Ceratodon purpureus [master's thesis]. Portland State University. doi:10.15760/etd.2654.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett SCH, Yakimowski SB, Field DE, Pickup M. 2010. Ecological genetics of sex ratios in plant populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 365:2549–2557. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisang I, Hedenäs L. 2005. Sex ratio patterns in dioicous bryophytes re-visited. Journal of Bryology. 27:207–219. doi: 10.1179/174328205X69959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers RM, McLetchie S, Knight R, Fierer N. 2011. Spatial variability in airborne bacterial communities across land-use types and their relationship to the bacterial communities of potential source environments. The ISME Journal. 5:601–612. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzyski JR, Stieha C, McLetchie DN. 2018. The impact of asexual and sexual reproduction in spatial genetic structure within and between populations of the dioecious plant Marchantia inflexa (Marchantiaceae). Annals of Botany. 122(6):993–1003. doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzyski JR, Taylor W, McLetchie DN. 2014. Reproductive allocation between the sexes, across natural and novel habitats, and its impact on genetic diversity. Evolutionary Ecology. 28:247–261. doi:10.1007/s10682-013-9672-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnell KD, Yelverton FH, Neal JC, Gannon TW, McElroy JS. 2004. Control of silvery-thread moss (Bryum argenteum Hedw.) in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis plaustris Huds.) putting greens. Weed Technology. 18:560–565. doi: 10.1614/WT-03-082R1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra RN, Bhatla SC. 1981. Effect of physical factors on gametangial induction, fertilization and sporophyte development in the moss Bryum argenteum grown in vitro. New Phytologist. 89:439–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1981.tb02325.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox DR. 1972. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. 34:87–220.
   Google Scholar
• Davey ML, Currah RS. 2006. Interactions between mosses (Bryophyta) and fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany. 84:1509–1519. doi: 10.1139/b06-120
   Google Scholar
• Davey ML, Heegaard E, Halvorsen R, Ohlson M, Kauserud H. 2012. Seasonal trends in the biomass and structure of bryophyte-associated fungal communities explored by 454 pyrosequencing. New Phytologist. 195:844–856. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04215.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR. 1993. Gender-specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in boxelder, Acer negundo. Ecology. 74:798–815. doi: 10.2307/1940807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca TH, Zackrisson O, Nilsson M-C, Sellstedt A. 2002. Quantifying nitrogen-fixation in feather moss carpets of boreal forests. Nature. 419:917–920. doi: 10.1038/nature01051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppley SM, Mercer CA, Haaning C, Graves CB. 2009. Sex-specific variation in the interaction between Distichlis spicata (Poaceae) and mycorrhizal fungi. American Journal of Botany. 96:1967–1973. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppley SM, Rosenstiel TN, Chmielewski MW, Cody Woll S, Shaw ZM, Shortlidge EE. 2018. Rapid population sex-ratio changes in the moss Ceratodon purpureus. American Journal of Botany. 105:1–7. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field DL, Pickup M, Barrett SCH. 2013. Ecological context and metapopulation dynamics affect sex-ratio variation among dioecious plant populations. Annals of Botany. 111:917–923. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman DC, Klikoff LC, Harper KT. 1976. Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science. 193:597–599. doi: 10.1126/science.193.4253.597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuselier L, McLetchie DN. 2004. Microhabitat and sex distribution in Marchantia inflexa, a dioicous liverwort. The Bryologist. 107:345–356. doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(2004)107[0345:MASDIM]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen KE, Stieha C, Crowley PH, McLetchie DN. 2012. Sex-specific plant responses to light intensity and canopy openness: implications for spatial segregation of the sexes. Oecologia. 162:561–570. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1473-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L, Bisang I, Korpelainen H, Cronholm B. 2010. The true sex ratio in European Pseudocalliergon trifarium (Bryophyta: Amblystegiaceae) revealed by a novel molecular approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 100:132–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L, Korpelainen H, Bisang I. 2016. Identifying sex in non-fertile individuals of the moss Drepanocladus turgescens (Bryophyta: Amblystegiaceae) using a novel molecular approach. Journal of Plant Research. 129:1005–1010. doi: 10.1007/s10265-016-0837-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. 1938. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular. 347:1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Holá E, Vesalainen T, Těšitel J, Laaka-Lindberg S. 2014. Sex ratio, sex-specific pattern in vegetative growth and gemma production in an aquatic liverwort, Scapania undulata (Marchantiophyta: Scapaniaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 175:229–241. doi: 10.1111/boj.12159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsley K, Stark LR, McLetchie DN. 2011. Does the silver moss Bryum argenteum exhibit sex-specific patterns in vegetative growth rate, asexual fitness or prezygotic reproductive investment? Annals of Botany. 107:897–907. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan EL, Meier P. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Associations. 53:457–481. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korczynski PC, Logan J, Faust JE. 2002. Mapping monthly distribution of daily light integrals across the contiguous United States. HortTechnology. 12:12–16. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.12.1.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laaka-Lindberg S. 2005. Reproductive phenology in the leafy hepatic Lophozia silvicola Buch in southern Finland. Journal of Bryology. 27:253–259. doi: 10.1179/174328205X70001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner L. 1939. Über die Jahresperiodizität in der Entwicklung der Laubmoose. Planta. 29:534–616. doi: 10.1007/BF01908957
   Google Scholar
• Longton RE. 1981. Inter-population variation in morphology and physiology in the cosmopolitan moss Bryum argenteum Hedw. Journal of Bryology. 11:501–520. doi: 10.1179/jbr.1981.11.3.501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longton RE, MacIver MA. 1977. Climatic adaptation in Antarctic and northern hemisphere populations of a cosmopolitan moss, Bryum argenteum Hedw. In: Llano GA, editor. Adaptations within Antarctic ecosystems. Washington: Smithsonian Institution; p. 899–919.
   Google Scholar
• Marks RA, Smith JJ, Cronk Q, McLetchie DN. 2018. Variation in the bacteriome of the tropical liverwort, Marchantia inflexa, between the sexes and across habitats. Symbiosis. 75:93–101. doi:10.1007/s13199-017-0522-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLetchie DN. 1992. Sex ratio from germination through maturity and its reproductive consequences in the liverwort Sphaerocarpos texanus. Oecologia. 92:273–278. doi: 10.1007/BF00317375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLetchie DN, García-Ramos G. 2017. A predictive relationship between population and genetic sex ratios in clonal species. Acta Oecologia. 80:18–23. doi:10.1016/j.acto.2017.02.002 doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JD, Kollar LM, McLetchie DN. 2016. Does selection for gamete dispersal and capture lead to a sex difference in clump water-holding capacity? American Journal of Botany. 103:1449–1457. doi:10.3732/ajb.1600096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JM, Hauser DA, Hinson R, Shaw AJ. 2018. A novel experimental system using the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha and its fungal endophytes reveals diverse and context-dependent effects. New Phytologist. 218:1217–1232. doi: 10.1111/nph.15012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush Z, Greenwood JL, McLetchie DN, Eppley SM, Keeley SJ, Castetter RC, Stark LR. 2018. Divergence in life history and developmental traits in Silvery-Thread Moss (Bryum argenteum Hedw.) genotypes between golf course putting greens and native habitats. Weed Science. 66:642–650. doi:10.1017/wsc.2018.37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren K, Halvorsen R, Cronberg N. 2010. Infrequent sporophyte production maintains a female-biased sex ratio in the unisexual clonal moss Hylocomium splendens. Journal of Ecology. 98:1224–1231. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01639.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Albright DL. 1990. Potential for the evolution of heavy metal tolerance in Bryum argenteum, a moss. II. Generalized tolerances among diverse populations. The Bryologist. 93:187–192. doi: 10.2307/3243622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Beer SC, Lutz J. 1989. Potential for the evolution of heavy metal tolerance in Bryum argenteum, a moss. I. Variation within and among populations. The Bryologist. 92:73–80. doi: 10.2307/3244019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Spence JR. 2012. Bryum Hedw. (Bryaceae). In: Flora of North American Editorial Committee, editors. Flora of North America, Vol. 28, Bryophytes: Mosses, part 2. New York: Oxford University Press; [accessed 2013 Apr 8]. www.mobot.org/plantsciences/BFNA/bfnamenu.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Stark LR, McLetchie DN, Eppley SM. 2010. Sex ratios and the shy male hypothesis in the moss Bryum argenteum (Bryaceae). The Bryologist. 113:788–797. doi: 10.1639/0007-2745-113.4.788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR, McLetchie DN, Mishler BD. 2005. Sex expression, plant size, and spatial segregation of the sexes across a stress gradient in the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. The Bryologist. 108:183–193. doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(2005)108[0183:SEPSAS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR, Mishler BD, McLetchie DN. 2000. The cost of realized sexual reproduction: assessing patterns of reproductive allocation and sporophyte abortion in a desert moss. American Journal of Botany. 87:1599–1608. doi: 10.2307/2656736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieha C, García-Ramos G, McLetchie DN, Crowley P. 2017. Maintenance of the sexes and persistence of a clonal organism in spatially complex metapopulations. Evolutionary Ecology. 31:363–386. doi 10.1007/s10682-016-9841-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valladares F, Niinemets Ü. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 39:237–257. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga S, Kytöviita MM. 2008. Sex-specific responses to mycorrhiza in a dioecious species. American Journal of Botany. 95:1225–1232. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Frutis R, Guevara R. 2009. Different arbuscular mycorrhizal interactions in male and female plants of wild Carica papaya L. Plant and Soil. 322:167–176. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-9903-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Frutis R, Munguía-Rosas MA, Varga S, Kytöviita MM. 2013. Sex-specific patterns of antagonistic and mutualistic biotic interactions in dioecious and gynodioecious plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 15:45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshan D, Espinoza JL, Stuart RK, Richter RA, Kim S-Y, Shapiro N, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Barry K, Singan V, et al. 2017. Feathermoss and epiphytic Nostoc cooperate differently: expanding the spectrum of plant-cyanobacteria symbiosis. The ISME Journal. 11:2821–2833. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar