Above- and below-ground species richness of bryophytes in Estonian mires: diversity and differences

References

• Barbé M, Fenton NJ, Bergeron Y. 2016. So close and yet so far away: long-distance dispersal events govern bryophyte metacommunity reassembly. Journal of Ecology. 104:1707–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisang I. 1996. Quantitative analysis of the diaspore banks of bryophytes and ferns in cultivated fields in Switzerland. Lindbergia. 21:9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bu Z-J, Sundberg S, Feng L, Li H-K, Zhao H-Y, Li H-C. 2017. The Methuselah of plant diaspores: Sphagnum spores can survive in nature for centuries. New Phytologist. 214:1398–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan DA, During HJ, Forrest LL, Wilkinson K. 2020. Neglected and at risk: bryophyte diaspore banks of coastal dune systems. Journal of Bryology. 42:223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DR, Rochefort L, Lavoie C. 2003. Determining the immigration potential of plants colonizing disturbed environments: the case of milled peatlands in Quebec. Journal of Applied Ecology. 40:78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caners RT, Macdonald SE, Belland RJ. 2009. Recolonization potential of bryophyte diaspore banks in harvested boreal mixed-wood forest. Plant Ecology. 204:55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DD, Atwood JJ. 2010. Mosses associated with coalmines and coal seams in western Pennsylvania. Evansia. 27:11–17.
   Google Scholar
• During HJ. 1997. Bryophyte diaspore banks. In: Longton RE, editor. Advances in bryology, vol. 6. Berlin: International Association of Bryologists; p. 103–134.
   Google Scholar
• During HJ. 2001. Diaspore banks. The Bryologist. 104:92–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbert W, Weber D, Burrows S, Steinkamp J, Düdel D, Andreae MO, Pöschl U. 2012. Contribution of cryptogamic covers to the global cycles of carbon and nitrogen. Nature Geoscience. 5:459–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L, Sundberg S, Ooi MKJ, Wu Y-H, Wang M, Bu Z-J. 2018. Oxygen-deficiency and allelochemicals affect Sphagnum spore persistence in peatlands. Plant and Soil. 432:403–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey W, Frahm J-P, Fischer E, Lobin W. 2006. The liverworts, mosses and ferns of Europe. Heidelberg: Gustav Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson U, Söderström L. 2007. Can artificial introductions of diaspore fragments work as a conservation tool for maintaining populations of the rare peatmoss Sphagnum angermanicum? Biological Conservation. 135:450–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hájek M, Jiroušek M, Navrátilová J, Horodyská E, Peterka T, Plesková Z, Navrátil J, Hájková P, Hájek T. 2015. Changes in the moss layer of Czech fens indicate early succession triggered by nutrient enrichment. Preslia. 87:279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hájek M, Horsáková V, Hájková P, Coufal R, Dítě D, Němec T, Horsák M. 2020. Habitat extremity and conservation management stabilise endangered calcareous fens in a changing world. Science of The Total Environment. 719:134693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock Z, Szövényi P, Schneller JJ, Tóth Z, Urmi E. 2008. Bryophyte diaspore bank: a genetic memory? Genetic structure and genetic diversity of surface populations and diaspore bank in the liverwort Mannia fragrans (Aytoniaceae). American Journal of Botany. 95:542–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgetts N, Lockhart N. 2020. Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – update 2020. Irish Wildlife Manuals, no. 123. Dublin: National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgetts N, Cálix M, Englefield E, Fettes N, García Criado M, Patin L, Nieto A, Bergamini A, Bisang I, Baisheva E, et al. 2019. A miniature world in decline: European Red List of mosses, liverworts and hornworts. Brussels: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Huopalainen M, Tuittila E-S, Vanha-Majamaa I, Nousiainen H, Laine J, Vasander H. 2000. The potential of soil seed banks for revegetation of bogs in SW Finland after long-term aerial pollution. Annales Botanici Fennici. 37:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics. [accessed 2020 Nov 15]. https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Iglesias N, Delgado V, Ederra A. 2015. A comparison between the diaspore bank and above-ground bryoflora in the beech forests of Navarra (northern Spain). Cryptogamie Bryologie. 36:19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerpuu N, Sarv M. 2015. Effect of grazing on plant diversity of coastal meadows in Estonia. Annales Botanici Fennici. 52:84–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerpuu N, Vellak K. 2018. Are viable diaspores valid members of the local bryophyte flora? Journal of Bryology. 40:193–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerpuu N, Nurkse K, Vellak K. 2014. Bryophytes in Estonian mires. Estonian Journal of Ecology. 63:3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ingerpuu N, Vellak K, Ehrlich L. 2018. Revised Red Data List of Estonian bryophytes. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica. 55:97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ingerpuu N, Kupper T, Vellak K, Kupper P, Sõber J, Tullus A, Zobel M, Liira J. 2019. Response of bryophytes to afforestation, increase of air humidity, and enrichment of soil diaspore bank. Forest Ecology and Management. 432:64–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen JAM, Rodwell JS, García Criado M, Gubbay S, Haynes T, Nieto A, Sanders N, Landucci F, Loidi J, Ssymank A, et al. 2016. European Red List of habitats. Part 2, Terrestrial and freshwater habitats. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Jauhiainen S. 1998. Seed and spore banks of two boreal mires. Annales Botanici Fennici. 35:197–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson BG. 1993. The bryophyte diaspore bank and its role after small-scale disturbance in a boreal forest. Journal of Vegetation Science. 4:819–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joosten H, Tanneberger F, Moen A, editors. 2017. Mires and peatlands of Europe: status, distribution and conservation. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kooijman AM, Bakker C. 1994. The acidification capacity of wetland bryophytes as influenced by simulated clean and polluted rain. Aquatic Botany. 48:133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövendi-Jakó A, Márialigeti S, Didló A, Ódor P. 2016. Environmental drivers of the bryophyte propagule bank and its comparison with forest-floor assemblage in Central European temperate mixed forests. Journal of Bryology. 38(2):118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Farge C, Williams KH, England JH. 2013. Regeneration of little Ice Age bryophytes emerging from a polar glacier with implications of totipotency in extreme environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 110:9839–9844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine J, Flatberg KI, Harju P, Timonen T, Minkkinen K, Laine A, Tuittila E-S, Vasander H. 2019. Sphagnum mosses – the stars of European mires. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Lett S, Nilsson M-C, Wardle DA, Dorrepaal E. 2016. Bryophyte traits explain climate-warming effects on tree seedling establishment. Journal of Ecology. 105:496–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis LR, Behling E, Gousse H, Qian E, Elphick CS, Lamarre J, Bêty J, Liebezeit J, Rozzi R, Goffinet B. 2014. First evidence of bryophyte diaspores in the plumage of transequatorial migrant birds. PeerJ. 2:e424. Doi:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder M, editor. 2017. Diversity of nature in Estonia. Estonian nature conservation in 2015. Tallinn: Estonian Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Lindo Z, Nilsson M-C, Gundale MJ. 2013. Bryophyte–cyanobacteria associations as regulators of the northern latitude carbon balance in response to global change. Global Change Biology. 19:2022–2035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnell N, Hylander K, Jonsson BG, Sundberg S. 2012. The fate of the missing spores – patterns of realized dispersal beyond the closest vicinity of a sporulating moss. PLoS ONE. 7(7):e41987. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciel-Silva AS, Válio IFM, Rydin H. 2012. Diaspore bank of bryophytes in tropical rain forests: the importance of breeding system, phylum and microhabitat. Oecologia. 168:321–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkowsky Y, Ostendorf AK, Roth-Nebelsick A. 2018. Funariaceae underground: a spore bank for Physcomitrella patens and Physcomitrium eurystomum. Herzogia. 31:791–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallón R, Reinoso J, Rodríguez-Oubiña J, González ML. 2006. In vitro development of vegetative propagules in Splachnum ampullaceum: brood cells and chloronematal bulbils. The Bryologist. 109:215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune B, Mefford MJ. 2006. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 5.0 for Windows. Gleneden Beach (OR): MjM Software.
   Google Scholar
• Paal J, Leibak E, editors. 2011. Estonian mires: inventory of habitats. Tartu: Eestimaa Looduse Fond.
   Google Scholar
• Pacé M, Bu NJ, Paréb D, Bergeron Y. 2018. Differential effects of feather and Sphagnum spp. mosses on black spruce germination and growth. Forest Ecology and Management. 415–416:10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patiño J, Vanderpoorten A. 2018. Bryophyte biogeography. Critical Reviews on Plant Sciences. 37:175–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [accessed 2020 Nov 23]. https://www.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Estonia Land Board. [date unknown]. Land information web map application. [accessed 2020 Nov 22]. https://xgis.maaamet.ee/maps/.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstiel TN, Eppley SM. 2009. Long-lived sperm in the geothermal bryophyte Pohlia nutans. Biology Letters. 5:857–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross-Davis AL, Frego KA. 2004. Propagule sources of forest floor bryophytes: spatiotemporal compositional patterns. The Bryologist. 107:88–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skotnicki ML, Selkirk PM. 2006. Plant biodiversity in an extreme environment. Genetic studies of origin, diversity and evolution in the Antarctic. In: Bergstrom DN, Convey P, Huiskes AHL, editors. Trends in Antarctic terrestrial and limnetic ecosystems. Amsterdam: Springer; p. 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• Staunch A, Redlecki M, Wooten J, Sleeper J, Titus J. 2012. Moss and soil substrates interact with moisture level to influence germination by three wetland tree species. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Botany. 2012:ID 456051 [6 p.]. doi:10.5402/2012/456051.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg S, Rydin H. 2000. Experimental evidence for a persistent spore bank in Sphagnum. New Phytologist. 148:105–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg S, Rydin H. 2002. Habitat requirements for establishment of Sphagnum from spores. Journal of Ecology. 90:268–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triisberg T, Karofeld E, Paal J. 2013. Factors affecting the re-vegetation of abandoned extracted peatlands in Estonia: a synthesis from field and greenhouse studies. Estonian Journal of Ecology. 62:192–211.
   Google Scholar
• Udd D, Sundberg S, Rydin H. 2016. Multi-species competition experiments with peatland bryophytes. Journal of Vegetation Science. 27:165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellak K, Ingerpuu N, Karofeld E. 2013. Eesti turbasamblad. The Sphagnum mosses of Estonia. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund K, Rydin H. 2004. Ecophysiological constraints on spore establishment in bryophytes. Functional Ecology. 18:907–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepeda CG, Lot A, Nemiga XA, Manjarrez J. 2014. Seed bank and established vegetation in the last remnants of the Mexican Central Plateau wetlands: the Lerma marshes. Revista de Biología Tropical. 62:455–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar