A review of the genus Glyphomitrium Brid. (Rhabdoweisiaceae, Bryophyta) in the Russian Far East

References

• Abramova AL, Abramov LI. 1955. Glyphomitrium warburgii (Broth) Card. – Новый вид для СССР [Glyphomitrium warburgii (Broth) Card. – the new species for USSR]. Botanicheskie Materialy Otdela Sporovykh Rastenii Botanicheskogo Instituta, Akademii Nauk SSSR. 10:257–262. Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Ashkenazy H, Cohen O, Pupko T, Huchon D. 2014. Indel reliability in indel-based phylogenetic inference. Genome Biology and Evolution. 6(12):3199–3209. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardunov LV, Cherdantseva VYa. 1982. Листостебельные мхи Южного Приморья [Mosses of the South of Primorskij Province]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Breiner FT, Guisan A, Bergamini A, Nobis MP. 2015. Overcoming limitations of modelling rare species by using ensembles of small models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 6(10):1210–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiner FT, Nobis MP, Bergamini A, Guisan A. 2018. Optimizing ensembles of small models for predicting the distribution of species with few occurrences. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 9(4):802–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherus VF. 1899. Neue Beiträge zur Moosflora Japans. Hedwigia. 38:204–240.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherus VF. 1929. Symbolae Sinicae 4. Musci. Wien. Verlag von Julius Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JL, Bennett JR, French CM. 2017. SDMtoolbox 2.0: the next generation Python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. PeerJ. 5:e4095. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherdantseva VYa, Pisarenko OYu, Ignatov MS, Ignatova EA, Fedosov VE, Dudov SV, Bakalin VA. 2018. Mosses of the southern Russian Far East, an annotated check-list. Botanica Pacifica. 7(2):53–81.
   Google Scholar
• Collart F, Hedenäs L, Broennimann O, Guisan A, Vanderpoorten A. 2021. Intraspecific differentiation: implications for niche and distribution modeling. Journal of Biogeography. 48(2):415–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum H. 1972. The dubious origin of Glyphomitrium canadense Mitt. Journal of Bryology. 7(2):165–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Cola V, Broennimann O, Petitpierre B, Breiner FT, D’Amen M, Randin C, Engler R, Pottier J, Pio D, Dubuis A, et al. 2017. Ecospat: An R package to support spatial analyses and modeling of species niches and distributions. Ecography. 40(6):774–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Tommaso P, Moretti S, Xenarios I, Orobitg M, Montanyola A, Chang JM, Taly JF, Notredame C. 2011. T-Coffee: a web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension. Nucleic Acids Research. 39(Suppl. 2):W13–W17. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dudík M, Schapire RE, Phillips SJ. 2005. Correcting sample selection bias in maximum entropy density estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 18. Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS 2005, December 5–8, 2005, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• El-Gabbas A, Dormann CF. 2017. Improved species-occurrence predictions in data-poor regions: using large-scale data and bias correction with down-weighted Poisson regression and MaxEnt. Ecography. 41(7):1161–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Gabbas A, Dormann CF. 2018. Wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range-wide data under biased sampling. Ecology and Evolution. 8(4):2196–2206. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions. 17(1):43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2011. ArcGIS 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fedosov VE, Fedorova AV, Larraín J, Santos MB, Stech M, Kučera J, Brinda JC, Tubanova DYa, Von Konrat M, Ignatova EA, et al. 2021. Unity in diversity: phylogenetics and taxonomy of Rhabdoweisiaceae (Dicranales, Bryophyta). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 195(4):545–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boaa087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedosov VE, Shkurko AV, Fedorova AV, Ignatova EA, Solovyeva EN, Brinda JC, Ignatov MS, Kučera J. 2022. Need for split: integrative taxonomy reveals unnoticed diversity in subaquatic species of Pseudohygrohypnum (Pylaisiaceae, Bryophyta). PeerJ. 10:e13260. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fithian W, Elith J, Hastie T, Keith DA. 2015. Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 6(4):424–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman J. 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics. 29(5):1189–1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner A, Ignatov MS, Huttunen S, Troitsky A. 2005. On resurrection of the families Pseudoleskeaceae Schimp. and Pylaisiaceae Schimp. (Musci, Hypnales). Taxon. 54:651–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Petitpierre B, Broennimann O, Daehler C, Kueffer C. 2014. Unifying niche shift studies: insights from biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 29(5):260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 4:9.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 2019. On the frequency of northern and mountain genetic variants of widespread species: essential biodiversity information in a warmer world. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 191(4):440–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boz061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Maqueda R, Quandt D, Werner O, Muñoz J. 2008. Phylogeny and classification of the Grimmiaceae/Ptychomitriaceae complex (Bryophyta) inferred from cpDNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 46(3):863–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatov MS, Afonina OM, Ignatova EA, Akatova TV, Baisheva EZ, Bardunov LV, Baryakina EA, Belkina OA, Bezgodov AG, Boychuk MA, et al. 2006. Checklist of mosses of East Europe and North Asia. Arctoa. 15:1–130.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov OV, Kolesnikova MA, Akatova TV, Afonina OM, Baisheva EZ, Bezgodov AG, Belkina OA, Czernyadjeva IV, Dudov SV, Fedosov VE, et al. 2017. The database of the moss flora of Russia. Arctoa. 26(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Iwatsuki Z. 2004. New catalog of the mosses of Japan. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 96:1–182.
   Google Scholar
• Karger DN, Conrad O, Böhner J, Kawohl T, Kreft H, Soria-Auza RW, Zimmermann NE, Linder HP, Kessler M. 2017. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Scientific Data. 4:170122. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karger DN, Conrad O, Böhner J, Kawohl T, Kreft H, Soria-Auza RW, Zimmermann NE, Linder HP, Kessler M. 2018. Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kd1d4
   Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Standley DN. 2013. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 30(4):772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarenko AS. 1933. До брioгеографii Схiдноi Азii [On the bryogeography of East Asia]. Botanical Journal of Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. 7–8. Ukrainian.
   Google Scholar
• Lomba A, Pellissier L, Randin C, Vicente J, Moreira F, Honrado J, Guisan A. 2010. Overcoming the rare species modelling paradox: a novel hierarchical framework applied to an Iberian endemic plant. Biological Conservation. 143(11):2647–2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdy M, Werner O, McDaniel SF, Goffinet B, Ros RM. 2016. Genomic scanning using AFLP to detect loci under selection in the moss Funaria hygrometrica along a climate gradient in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, Spain. Plant Biology. 18(2):280–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merow C, Smith MJ, Silander JA Jr. 2013. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography. 36(10):1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitten W. 1859. Musci Indiae orientalis. An enumeration of the mosses of the East Indiens. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society. Botany. Supplement. 1:1–171.
   Google Scholar
• Mitten W. 1891. An enumeration of all species of Musci and Hepaticae recorded from Japan. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London. Botany. 3:153–206.
   Google Scholar
• Müller K. 2005. SeqState. Applied Bioinformatics. 4(1):65–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noguchi A. 1968. Notulae Bryologicae VIII. Status of some Asiatic mosses and the description of a new species of Glyphomitrium. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 31:312–316.
   Google Scholar
• Noguchi A. 1988. Illustrated moss flora of Japan. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 2:243–492.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce JL, Boyce MS. 2006. Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. Journal of Applied Ecology. 43(3):405–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M, Peterson AT. 2006. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography. 34(1):102–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson AT. 2011. Ecological niche conservatism: a time-structured review of evidence. Journal of Biogeography. 38(5):817–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02456.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological modeling. 190(3–4):231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Dudík M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with MaxEnt: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 31(2):161–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, Ferrier S. 2009. Sample selection bias and presence only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications. 19(1):181–197. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2153.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisa S, Werner O, Vanderpoorten A, Magdy M, Ros RM. 2013. Elevational patterns of genetic variation in the cosmopolitan moss Bryum argenteum (Bryaceae). American Journal of Botany. 100(10):2000–2008. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1300100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QGIS Development Team. 2021. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org
   Google Scholar
• Qiao H, Escobar LE, Peterson AT. 2017. Accessible areas in ecological niche comparisons of invasive species: recognized but still overlooked. Scientific Reports. 7:1213. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01313-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Radosavljevic A, Anderson RP. 2014. Making better MaxEnt models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation. Journal of Biogeography. 41(4):629–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. 2018. Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology. 67(5):901–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese WD. 2008. Ptychomitriaceae. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee, editors. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 27. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. pp. 306–310.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 61:539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shcheglovitova M, Anderson RP. 2013. Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: a jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecological Modelling. 269:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology. 49:349–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing T, Sander O, Beerenwinkel N, Lengauer T. 2005. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics. 21(20):7881. http://rocr.bioinf.mpi-sb.mpg.de
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T. 2015. Glyphomitrium (Glyphomitriaceae, Bryopsida) species newly found in Japan. Hattoria. 6:31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Thuiller W, Georges D, Engler R, Breiner F. 2019. biomod2: ensemble platform for species distribution modeling. R package version 3.3-7.1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-proje ct.org/package=biomod2
   Google Scholar
• Tuanmu MN, Jetz W. 2014. A global 1-km consensus land-cover product for biodiversity and ecosystem modeling. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 23(9):1031–1045. [accessed 2021 Mar 20]. http://www.earthenv.org/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Proosdij AS, Sosef MS, Wieringa JJ, Raes N. 2016. Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models. Ecography. 39(6):542–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MZ. 2011. Glyphomitriaceae. In: Wu PC, Crosby MR, He S, editors. Moss flora of China, English version. Vol. 5. Erpodiaceae–Climaciaceae. St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press; p. 10–21.
   Google Scholar
• Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution. 62(11):2868–2883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. 2010. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography. 33(3):607–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Li J, Peterson AT, Graham CH, Guisan A; NCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group. 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions. 14(5):763–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar