The usefulness of the grammaticality–acceptability distinction in functional approaches to language

References

• Allen, Joseph, and MarkSeidenberg. 1999. The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks. In The Emergence of Language, ed. BrianMacWhinney, 115–51. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, Gerry T.M., and MarkSteedman. 1988. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition30: 191–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, David A.1994. Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed. Morton A.Gernsbacher, 303–58. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bard, Ellen G., DanRobertson, and AntonellaSorace. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language72: 32–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, Elizabeth, and BrianMacWhinney. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing, ed. ElizabethBates and BrianMacWhinney, 3–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Tanya Karoli, and LarsHeltoft. 2010. Mood in danish. In Mood in the Languages of Europe, ed. BjörnRothstein and RolfThieroff, 85–102. Amsterdam/Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, William. 1995. Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language71: 490–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth, Lisbeth FalsterJakobsen, and Lone SchackRasmussen. 1994. Function and Expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth, and MadsPoulsen. 2010. Alternative agreement controllers in Danish: Usage or structure? In Language Usage and Language Structure, ed. ElisabethEngberg-Pedersen and KasperBoye, 205–35. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, Fernanda. 2003. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology47: 164–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnsey, Susan, Neal J.Pearlmutter, ElizabethMyers, and Melanie A.Lotocky. 1997. The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language37: 58–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harder, Peter. 1996. Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure, and Tense in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Harder, Peter. 2012. Performance, postmodernity and errors. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia44: 22–44.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2000. Why can't we talk to each other?Lingua110: 235–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeister, Philip, and Ivan A.Sag. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language86: 366–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul. 1987. Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society13: 139–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Lisbeth Falster. 2000. Om sproglig akceptabilitet. In Funktionelle Fodnoter. Forår 2000, 44–52. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Anne. 2000. Grammatikalitet og acceptabilitet. In Funktionelle Fodnoter. Forår 2000, 53–60. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Anne. 2001. Sentence intertwining in Danish. In Ikonicitet Og Struktur, ed. ElisabethEngberg-Pedersen and PeterHarder, 23–39. Preprint from Netværk for Funktionel Lingvistik, Department of English, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Torben Juel. 2011. Ordstilling i ledsætninger i moderne dansk talesprog. Ny Forskning i Grammatik18: 123–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, Elsi, and John C.Trueswell. 2004. The role of discourse context in the processing of flexible word-order language. Cognition94: 113–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluender, Robert. 1998. On the distinction between strong and weak islands: A processing perspective. In The Limits of Syntax, ed. Peter W.Culicover and LouiseMcNally, 241–79. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kluender, Robert, and MartaKutas. 1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomena. Language and Cognitive Processes8: 573–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, Line Burholt, ElisabethEngberg-Petersen, and MadsPoulsen. 2013. Context improves comprehension of fronted objects. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10936-013-9241-y.pdf#.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and MarkJohnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W.1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W.2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Usage Based Models of Language, ed. MichaelBarlow and SuzanneKemmer, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W.2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Maryellen, Neal J.Pearlmutter, and MarkSeidenberg. 1994. Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review101: 676–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmeyer, Frederick J.1998. Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, Mads. 2008. Acceptability and processing of long-distance dependencies in Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics31: 73–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütze, Carson T.1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, Mark, and MaryellenMacDonald. 1999. A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science23: 569–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprouse, Jon, MattWagers, and ColinPhillips. 2012. A test of the relation between working memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language88: 82–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togeby, Ole. 2003. Fungerer Denne Sætning. Funktionel Dansk Sproglære. København: Gads Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, Justine B., Morten H.Christiansen, David S.Race, Daniel J.Acheson, and Maryellen C.MacDonald. 2009. Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology58: 250–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar