Revisiting Perfect/Preterit instability across Romance. On functional motivations for diverging paths

References

• Boyd, Jeremy Kenyon. 2007. “Comparatively Speaking: A Psycholinguistic Study of Optionality in Grammar.” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan, and Östen Dahl. 1989. “The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World.” Studies in Language 13: 51–103.10.1075/sl.13.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Östen, ed. 2000. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Daniliuc, Laura, and Radu Daniliuc. 2000. Descriptive Romanian Grammar: An Outline. Munich: Lincom Europa ( Lincom Studies in Romance Linguistics, 14).
   Google Scholar
• Fløgstad, Guro Nore. 2016. Preterit Expansion and Perfect Demise in Porteño Spanish and Beyond. A Critical Perspective on Cognitive Grammaticalization Theory. Leiden: Brill. ( Studies in Historical Linguistics, 6).
   Google Scholar
• Fløgstad, Guro Nore, and Celeste Rodríguez Louro. Submitted. “Gauging Expansion in Synchrony. The Perfect in 19th Century Rioplatense Spanish.”
   Google Scholar
• Gildea, Spike, and Sérgio Meira. 2014. “Increasing Morphological Complexity Without Contact: Verbs in the Cariban Family.” Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland, September 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Joseph H., Charles E. Osgood, and James Jenkins. 1966. “Memorandum Concerning Language Universals.” In Universals of Language, edited by Joseph H. Greenberg, xv–xxvii. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Martin, and Nigel Vincent, eds. 1988. The Romance Languages. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. “Form-frequency Correspondences in Tense, Aspect and Modality.” Plenary talk, Chronos, June 2016, Caen, France.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Carlos. 2010. El pretérito perfecto compuesto del español de Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay: Aspectos semánticos y discursivos [The Spanish Perfect of Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay: Semantic and Discursive Aspects]. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Spanish, Portuguese and Latin American Studies, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, Kees. 2011. “The grammaticalization of tense and aspect.” In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, edited by Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine, 580–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, José Estebán. 2006. “Present Perfects in Salvadoran narratives. The perfective expansion into narrative discourse.” In Selected Proceedings from the 95th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium, edited by Nuria Sagarra and Almeida Jacqueline Toribio, 297–307. Somersville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525
   Google Scholar
• Howe, Chad. 2013. The Spanish Perfects. Pathways of Emergent Meaning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137029812
   Google Scholar
• Howe, Chad, and Scott A. Schwenter. 2003. “Present Perfect for Preterite Across Spanish Dialects.” In Selected Papers from NWAV-31, edited by Tara Sánchez and Uri Horesh, 61–76. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press ( Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 9(2)).
   Google Scholar
• Hualde, José. 1992. Catalan. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado Gonzáles, Silvia. 2009. “El perfecto simple y el perfecto compuesto en Hispanoamérica: la inclusión o exclusión del ahora de la enunciación.” [The Simple and Compound Perfect in Hispanoamerica: The Inclusion or Exclusion of “Ahora” in the Sentence.] Estudios filológicos 44: 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Michael Allan. 1993. Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kany, Charles E. (1945) 1970. Sintaxis Hispanoamericana [Hispano-American Syntax]. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, Gero. 2016. “Effects of Processing Complexity in Perception and Production. The Case of English Comparative Alternation.” In Word Structure and Word Usage. Proceedings of the NetWordS Final Conference, Pisa, March 30-April 1, 2015, edited by Vito Pirrelli, Claudia Marzi, and Marcello Ferro, 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, Anthony. 1994. A Grammar of the Norman French of the Channel Islands: The dialects of Jersey and Sark. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110877281
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. “The Perfect – Aspectual, Temporal and Evidential.” In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, edited by Östen Dahl, 356–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lipski, John M. 2006. “Too Close for Comfort? The Genesis of Portuñol/Portunhol.” In Selected Proceedings from the 8th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium, edited by Timothy L. Face and Carol Klee, 1–22. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Lope Blanch, Juan M. 1972. En Torno a las Vocales Caedizas del Español Mexicano. Estudios sobre el Español de México [Regarding vowel reduction in Mexican Spanish. Studies in the Spanish of Mexico]. Mexico City: Editorial Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, Ian. 1995. “The Supposed Imperfectivity of the Latin American Perfect.” Hispanic Linguistics 6 (7): 29–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mondorf, Britta. 2009. More Support for More-support. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/silv.4
   Google Scholar
• Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, Fatima, and Ana Lopes. 1995. “Tense and Aspect in Portuguese.” In Tense Systems in European Languages, edited by Rolf Thieroff, 95–110. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Penny, Ralph. 2000. Variation and Change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164566
   Google Scholar
• Piñero Piñero, Gracia. 2000. Perfecto Simple y Perfecto Compuesto en la Norma Culta de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria [Simple and Compound Perfect in the “Norma Culta” of Las Palmas, Gran Canaria]. Frankfurt: Vervuert.
   Google Scholar
• Quesada Pacheco, Miguel Ángel. 2009. Historia de la Lengua Española en Costa Rica. San Jose, CA: Editorial UCR.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Louro, Celeste. 2009. Perfect Evolution and Change: A Sociolinguistic Study of Preterit and Present Perfect Usage in Contemporary and Earlier Argentina. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. “Cognitive Complexity and Increased Grammatical Explicitness in English.” Cognitive Linguistics 7 (2): 149–182.10.1515/cogl.1996.7.2.149
   Google Scholar
• Schwenter, Scott A., and Rena Torres Cacoullos. 2008. “Defaults and Indeterminacy in Temporal Grammaticalization. The ‘perfect’ Road to Perfective.” Language Variation and Change 20: 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedano, Mercedes, and Paola Bentivoglio. 1996. “Venezuela.” In Manual de Dialectología Hispánica: El Español de América [Manual of Hispanic Dialectology. The Spanish of America], edited by Manuel Alvar, 196–208. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, Dan Isaac. 1977. “Language Change in Childhood and in History.” In Language Learning and Thought, edited by John MacNamara, 185–214. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squartini, Mario. 1998. Verbal Periphrases in Romance [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 21]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110805291
   Google Scholar
• Squartini, Mario, and Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. “The Simple and Compound Past in Romance Languages.” In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, edited by Östen Dahl, 20–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2014. “Toward a Constructional Framework for Research on Language Change.” In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data, edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König, 87–106. Amsterdam: Benjamins ( Studies in Language Companion Series, 162).
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth, and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press ( Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, 6).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varol, Marie-Christine. 2008. Manual of Judeo-Spanish. Language and Culture. Bethesda, MD: University Press of Maryland ( Studies and Texts in Jewish History and Culture, 16).
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, Nigel. 2014. “Similarity and Diversity in the Evolution of Italo-Romance Morphosyntax.” In Diachrony and Dialects: Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, edited by Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway, and Nigel Vincent, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zamora Vicente, Alonso. 1967. Dialectología Española [Spanish Dialectology]. 2nd ed. Madrid: Gredos.
   Google Scholar