Polycentric development in the Cape Town city-region: Empirical assessment and consideration of spatial policy implications

References

• Batty, M, 2001. Polynucleated urban landscapes. Urban Studies, 38(4), 635–55. doi: 10.1080/00420980120035268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, P, Giovannetti, E & Pagliacci, F, 2011. Regional patterns in the achievement of the Lisbon Strategy: A comparison between polycentric regions and monocentric ones. CAPPaper n.97, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena. http://www.capp.unimore.it/pubbl/cappapers/Capp_p97.pdf Accessed 11 June 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Burgalassi, D, 2010. Defining and measuring polycentric regions.The case of Tuscany. Discussion Paper n.101, E-papers del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, University of Pisa, Pisa. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25880/1/Burgalassi_discussion_paper.pdf Accessed 21 January 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, M & Meijers, E, 2012. Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies 49(5), 1127–49. doi: 10.1177/0042098011407095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoCT (City of Cape Town), 2006. Cape Town 2030: An Argument for the Long Term Spatial Development of Cape Town. City of Cape Town, Cape Town. http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/IDP/Documents/Statutory%20compliance%20plans%202009-2010/Annexure%20B%20-%20FutureCapeTown.pdf Accessed 2 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• CoCT (City of Cape Town), 2012. Cape Town Spatial Development Framework: Statutory Report. City of Cape Town, Cape Town. http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/sdf/Documents/SDF_Technical_Report_2012_Interactive.pdf Accessed 18 February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S, 2003. European briefing: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies 11(8), 979–99. doi: 10.1080/0965431032000146169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Goei, B, Burger, M, Van Oort, F & Kitson, M, 2010. Functional polycentrism and urban network development in the Greater South East, United Kingdom: Evidence from commuting patterns, 1981–2001. Regional Studies 44(9), 1149–70. doi: 10.1080/00343400903365102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs & The Presidency, 2009. National Urban Development Framework: Harnessing a common vision for growth and development of South Africa's towns, cities and city-regions (working draft for consultation). Prepared by the NUDF Steering Committee and in partnership with the South African Cities Network. http://africancentreforcities.net/papers/29 Accessed 14 January 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, R, van Niekerk, A, du Plessis, D & Spocter, M, 2012. Non-metropolitan growth potential of Western Cape municipalities. Urban Forum 23(3), 367–89. doi: 10.1007/s12132-011-9139-4
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S, 2005. Potentials for polycentric development in Europe: The ESPON 1.1. 1 project report. Planning, Practice & Research 20(2), 235–9. doi: 10.1080/02697450500414728
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 1999. European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards a Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Office for Official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Gabaix, X, 1999. Zipf's Law and the growth of cities. The American Economic Review 89(2), 129–32. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabaix, X & Ioannides, Y, 2004. The evolution of city size distributions. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4, 2341–78. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80010-5
   Google Scholar
• Garreau, J, 1991. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. Doubleday, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gauteng Province, 2007. Gauteng Spatial Development Perspective. Gauteng Provincial Government, Johannesburg. www.ecodev.gpg.gov.za/GSDP%20Report%20Final2.pdf Accessed 22 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Green, N, 2007. Functional polycentricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis. Urban Studies 44(11), 2077–103. doi: 10.1080/00420980701518941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P, 1997. Modelling the post-industrial city. Futures 29(4), 311–22. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00013-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, R & Lambregts, B, 2001. Clustering of economic activities in polycentric urban regions: The case of the Randstad. Urban Studies 38(4), 717–32. doi: 10.1080/00420980120035303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, R & Musterd, S, 2001. The polycentric urban region: Towards a research agenda. Urban Studies 38(4), 623–33. doi: 10.1080/00420980120035259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambooy, J, 1998. Polynucleation and economic development: The Randstad. European Planning Studies 6(4), 457–67. doi: 10.1080/09654319808720474
   Google Scholar
• Limtanakool, N, Dijst, M & Schwanen, T, 2007. A theoretical framework and methodology for characterising national urban systems on the basis of flows of people: Empirical evidence for France and Germany. Urban Studies 44(11), 2123–45. doi: 10.1080/00420980701518990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limtanakool, N, Schwanen, T & Dijst, M, 2009. Developments in the Dutch urban system on the basis of flows. Regional Studies 43(2), 179–96. doi: 10.1080/00343400701808832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E, 2007. Clones or complements? The division of labour between the main cities of the Randstad, the Flemish Diamond and the Rhein Ruhr Area. Regional Studies 41(7), 889–900. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E, 2008. Measuring polycentricity and its promises. European Planning Studies 16(9), 1313–23. doi: 10.1080/09654310802401805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2006. Territorial Reviews: Competitive Cities in the Global Economy. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2007. Territorial Reviews: Randstad Holland, Netherlands. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2008. Territorial Reviews: Cape Town. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J, 2004. The polycentric urban region: A closer inspection. Regional Studies 38(3), 231–40. doi: 10.1080/003434042000211114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieterse, E, 2008. Regional development: Strategies for the future. State of the Province, Report 2008: Chapter 10. http://africancentreforcities.net/papers/4/ Accessed 5 May 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pillay, U, 2004. Are globally competitive ‘city regions’ developing in South Africa? Formulaic aspirations or new imaginations? Urban Forum 15(4), 340–64. doi: 10.1007/s12132-004-0013-5
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M, 2003. The economic performance of regions. Regional studies 37(6–7), 549–78. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000108688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PGWC (Provincial Government Western Cape), 2005. Provincial Spatial Development Framework. PGWC, Cape Town. http://www.westerncape.gov.za/text/2005/12/1-3_cfgdtc_pages_1-50_web.pdf Accessed 2 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, C, 2009. The turn to ‘New Regionalism’: South African reflections. Urban Forum 20(2), 111–40. doi: 10.1007/s12132-009-9057-x
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A, 2001. Globalization and the rise of city-regions. European Planning Studies 9(7), 813–26. doi: 10.1080/09654310120079788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A, 2002. Regional push: Towards a geography of development and growth in low and middle-income countries. Third World Quarterly 23(1), 137–61. doi: 10.1080/01436590220108216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair-Smith, K & Turok, I, 2012. The changing spatial economy of cities: An exploratory analysis of Cape Town. Development Southern Africa 29(3), 391–417. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2012.706037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa, 2012. Census 2011 – Census in Brief. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M & Venables, A, 2004. Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography 4(4), 351–70. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Presidency, 2007. National Spatial Development Perspective 2006. The Presidency Policy Coordination and Advisory Services, Pretoria. http://www.npconline.co.za/MediaLib/Downloads/Home/Tabs/Diagnostic/MaterialConditions2/The%20Presidency-%20National%20spatial%20development%20perspective.pdf Accessed 5 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Turok, I & Bailey, N, 2004. The theory of polynuclear urban regions and its application to Central Scotland. European Planning Studies 12(3), 371–89. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000195029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Niekerk, A, Donaldson, R, du Plessis, D & Spocter, M, 2010. A Revision of 2004 Growth Potential of Towns in the Western Cape Study: Discussion Document: A Research Study Undertaken for the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning of the Western Cape Provincial Government. Stellenbosch University & CSIR, Stellenbosch. http://academic.sun.ac.za/cga/downloads/GPS2010_discussion_document.pdf Accessed 2 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vasanen, A, 2012. Functional polycentricity: Examining metropolitan spatial structure through the connectivity of urban sub-centres. Urban studies 49(16), 3627–44. doi: 10.1177/0042098012447000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpe, R, 2010. Western Cape Cross-Border Collaboration Initiative: International case studies of economic development focused cross border initiatives and networks: Discussion document for comment. Unpublished document, Wolpe Strategic Economic Consulting, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, 2009. World Development Report 2009: Shaping Economic Geography. World Bank, Washinton, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G, 1949. Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar