603
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The profits of excludability and transferability in redistributive land reform in central Namibia

, , , , &

References

  • Abdulai, A, Owusu, V, Goetz R, 2011. Land tenure differences and investment in land improvement measures: Theorectical and empirical analyses. Journal of Development Economics 96(1), 66–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.08.002
  • Adams, M, Cousins, B & Manona, S, 1999. Land tenure and economic development in rural South Africa: Constraints and opportunities. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper 125, 7–32.
  • Ali, DA, Dercon, S & Gautam, M, 2007. Property rights in a very poor country: Tenure insecurity and investment in Ethiopia. Policy Research Working Paper Series 4363. The World Bank, Washington, D.C. http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2007/09/20/000158349_20070920132159/Rendered/PDF/WPS4363.pdf/.
  • Arrow, KJ, 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies 29, 155–73. doi: 10.2307/2295952
  • Bromley, DW, 2009. Formalising property relations in the developing world: The wrong prescription for the wrong malady. Land Use Policy 26, 20–7. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.02.003
  • Carter, MR & Olinto, P, 2003. Getting institutions “right” for whom? Credit constraints and the impact of property rights on the quantity and composition of investment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(1), 173–86. doi: 10.1111/1467-8276.00111
  • De Soto, H, 2000. The mystery of capital. Basic books, New York, NY.
  • Deininger, K, 2003. Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. The World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, DC.
  • Deininger, K., Ali, DA, Holden, S. & Zevenbergen, J, 2008. Rural land certification in Ethiopia: Process, initial impact, and implications for other African countries. World Development 36(10), 1786–812. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.012
  • Deininger, K. & Feder, G. 2009. Land registration, governance, and development: Evidence and implications for policy. The World Bank Research Observer 24(2), 233–66. doi: 10.1093/wbro/lkp007
  • Deininger, K & Jin, S, 2006. Tenure security and land-related investments: Evidence from Ethiopia. European Economic Review 50, 1245–77. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.02.001
  • Demsetz, H. 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 57(2), 347–59.
  • Dekker, HAL, 2003. The invisible line. Land reform, land tenure security and land registration. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, UK.
  • Do, Q-T, and Iyer, L, 2008. Land titling and rural transition in Vietnam. Economic Development and Cultural Change 56, 531–79. doi: 10.1086/533549
  • Falk, T, Kruger, B, Lohmann, D, Kamukuenjandje, R, Zimmermann, I, Kirk, M, Hindjou, J, Kambuli, R, Sheehama, P, Koop, L, Heil, N, Lebershausen, L, Neu, D & Frank, A, 2010. Economic and ecological indicators of land reform projects in eastern Namibia. In Jürgens, N. et al. (Eds.), Biodiversity in Southern Africa. Volume 2: Patterns and processes at regional scale. Klaus Hess Publishers, Göttingen, Germany, and Windhoek, Namibia, 200–6.
  • Fenske, J 2011. Land tenure and investment incentives: Evidence from West Africa. Journal of Development Economics 95(2), 137–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.001
  • Galiani, S & Schargrodsky, E, 2010. Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling. Journal of Public Economics 94, 700–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.002
  • Graz, P, 2008. The woody weed encroachment puzzle: Gathering pieces. Ecohydrology 1, 340–48. doi: 10.1002/eco.28
  • Hanan, GJ, Guo, L & Scott, R 2002. Hazards of expropriation: Tenure insecurity and investment in rural China. American Economic Review 92(5), 1420–47. doi: 10.1257/000282802762024575
  • Harring, SL & Odendaal, W, 2007. No resettlement available – An assessment of the expropriation and its impact on land reform in Namibia. Legal Assistance Centre, Windhoek, Namibia. http://www.lac.org.na/projects/lead/Pdf/exprorep.pdf.
  • Holden, S & Yohannes, H, 2002. Land redistribution, tenure insecurity, and intensity of production: A study of farm households in southern Ethiopia. Land Economics 78(4), 573–90. doi: 10.2307/3146854
  • Kaukungua, S, Eiseb, GEE, Horsthemke, O, Tjimune, VM, Kasheeta, S & Kashululu, RM, 2004. Background research work and findings of the PTT studies. The Permanent Technical Team (PTT) on Land Reform, Ministry of Lands, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Windhoek, Namibia.
  • Kirk, M, 1999. Land tenure, technological change and resource use. Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., Hesse, Germany.
  • Kirk, M. forthcoming. Support to land reform in Namibia – Knowledge management report. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Eschborn, Germany.
  • LAC (Legal Assistance Centre). 2005. Our land we farm – An analysis of the Namibian commercial agricultural land reform process. Land, Environment and Development (LEAD) Project, Legal Assistance Centre, Windhoek, Namibia. http://www.lac.org.na/projects/lead/Pdf/landwefarm.pdf.
  • Libecap, GD, 2002. A transactions–costs approach to the analysis of property rights. In Brousseau, E & Glachant, J-M (Eds.), The economics of contracts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 140–56.
  • Lohmann, D., Falk, T, Geissler, K, Blaum, N & Jeltsch, F, 2014. Determinants of semi-arid rangeland management in a land reform setting in Namibia. Journal of Arid Environments 100-101, 23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.10.005
  • Manji, A, 2006. The politics of land reform in Africa. From communal tenure to free markets. Zed Books, London.
  • Markussen, T, 2008. Property rights, productivity, and common property resources: Insights from rural Cambodia. World Development 36(11), 2277–96. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.04.008
  • Meinzen-Dick, R & Pradhan, R, 2002. Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights. CAPRi Working Paper No. 22. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.capri.cgiar.org/pdf/CAPRIWP22.pdf.
  • Mendelsohn, J., Jarvis, A, Roberts, C & Robertson, T, 2002. Atlas of Namibia. David Philip Publishers, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • North, D, 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Olbrich, R, 2012. Environmental risk and sustainability – The case of commercial livestock farming in semi-arid rangelands. PhD Thesis, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Germany.
  • Place, F, 2009. Land tenure and agricultural productivity in Africa: A comparative analysis of the economics literature and recent policy strategies and reforms. World Development 37(8), 1326–36. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.020
  • Platteau, J-P, 2000. Does Africa need land reform? In Toulmin, C & Quan, JF (Eds.), Evolving land rights, policy and tenure in Africa. UK Department for International Development; International Institute for Environment and Development, Natural Resources Institute, London, 51–74.
  • Quan, JF, 2000. Land tenure, economic growth and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Toulmin, C & Quan, JF (Eds.), Evolving land rights, policy and tenure in Africa. UK Department for International Development; International Institute for Environment and Development, Natural Resources Institute, London, 31–50.
  • RoN (Republic of Namibia). 1995a. Agricultural commercial land reform act, 1995 (no. 6 of 1995). Government Gazette No. 1040. Windhoek, Namibia.
  • RoN (Republic of Namibia). 1995b. National agricultural policy. Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Rural Development, Windhoek, Namibia.
  • RoN (Republic of Namibia). 2001. National resettlement policy. Ministry of Lands, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Windhoek, Namibia.
  • RoN (Republic of Namibia). 2002. Notification No. 219 of farming units offered for allotment according to the agricultural (commercial) land reform act, 1995. Government Gazette, Windhoek, Namibia.
  • RoN (Republic of Namibia). 2007. Strategic plan 2006–2010. Ministry of Lands and Resettlement, Windhoek, Nambia.
  • RoN (Republic of Namibia). 2010. Poverty impact assessment of the various land reform programmes. Republic of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.
  • Schlager, E & Ostrom, E, 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68(3), 249–62. doi: 10.2307/3146375
  • Sherbourne, R, 2004. Rethinking land reform in Namibia: Any room for economics? IPPR Opinion No. 13. Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), Windhoek, Namibia.
  • Sjaastad, E & Cousins, B, 2009. Formalization of land rights in the south: An overview. Land Use Policy 26(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.004
  • Smith, RE, 2004. Land tenure, fixed investment, and farm productivity: Evidence from Zambia’s southern province. World Development 32(10), 1641–61. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.05.006
  • Toulmin, C & Quan, J, 2000. Evolving land rights, tenure and policy in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Toulmin, C & Quan, JF (Eds.), Evolving land rights, policy and tenure in Africa. UK Department for International Development; International Institute for Environment and Development, Natural Resources Institute, London, 1–30.
  • Udry, C 1996. Gender, agricultural production, and the theory of the household. Journal of Political Economy 104(5), 1010–46. doi: 10.1086/262050
  • Werner, W, 1993. A brief history of land disposession in Namibia. Journal of Southern African Studies 19(1), 135–46. doi: 10.1080/03057079308708351
  • Werner, W, 2004. Policy framework land reform, natural resources and decentralisation. Gesellschaft fuer Technische Zusammenarbeit. Windhoek, Namibia.
  • Werner, W & Kruger, B, 2007. Redistributive land reform and poverty reduction in Namibia. Country paper of the livelihoods after land reform project, Windhoek, Namibia.
  • Werner, W & Odendaal, W, 2010. Livelihoods after land reform – Namibia country report. Legal Assistance Centre, Windhoek, Namibia.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.