Informal settlement upgrading, assets and poverty alleviation: Evidence from longitudinal research in South Africa

References

• Boonyabancha, S, 2008. Upgrading Thailand’s urban settlements: A community driven process of social development. In Moser, C & Dani, A (Eds.), Assets, livelihoods and social policy. World Bank, Washington, pp. 195–214.
   Google Scholar
• Boonyabancha, S, Carcellar, F & Kerr, T, 2012. How poor communities are paving their own pathways to freedom. Environment and Urbanization 24(2), 446–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botes, L, Krige, S & Wessels, J, 1991. Informal settlements in Bloemfontein: A study of migration patterns, socio-economic profile, living conditions and future housing expectations. Urban Foundation, Bloemfontein.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M & May, J, 2001. One kind of freedom: Poverty dynamics in post-apartheid South Africa. World Development 29(12), 1987–2006. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00089-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, W, 2013. The aftermath of the general financial crisis for the ownership society: What happened to low-income homeowners in the US? International Journal of Housing Policy 13(3), 227–46. doi: 10.1080/14616718.2013.796811
   Google Scholar
• Cross, C, 2008. Housing delivery as anti-poverty: Is South Africa on the right track? Paper presented at Southern African Housing Foundation international conference and exhibition, Cape Town, 12–15 October.
   Google Scholar
• Dani, A & Moser, C, 2008. Asset-based social policy and public action in a polycentric world. In Moser, C & Dani, A (Eds.), Assets, livelihoods and social policy. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 3–41.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Settlements, 2014. Housing programme theory. Department of Human Settlements, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, R & Haurin, D, 2003. The social and private micro-level consequences of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics 54(3), 401–50. doi: 10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00080-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford Foundation, 2006. Building assets to reduce poverty and injustice. Ford Foundation, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A, 2002a. Scan globally, reinvent Locally: Reflecting on the Origins of South Africa’s Capital Housing Subsidy Programme. Urban Studies 39, 1911–33. doi: 10.1080/0042098022000003028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A, 2002b. On the mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando De Soto: What difference does legal title make? International Development Planning Review 24(1), 1–19. doi: 10.3828/idpr.24.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, A, 2013. Creating co-sovereigns through the provision of low cost housing: The case of Johannesburg, South Africa. Habitat International 39, 278–283.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, A & Scheepers, L, 2012. “Crisylida capital”: Hatching informal township property markets to benefit Low-income residents in Johannesburg, South Africa. Urban Forum 23, 165–80. doi: 10.1007/s12132-011-9136-7
   Google Scholar
• Hammock, J, Lubell, H, Sethuraman, S & Rafsky, W, 1981. Low-income settlement improvement through income and employment generation and integrated housing programmes. In United nations centre for human settlements (HABITAT), The residential circumstances of the urban poor in developing countries. Praeger, New York, pp. 257–74.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R, 1998. The silence of the experts: Aided self-help housing, 1939–1954. Habitat International 22(2), 165–89. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(97)00038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huchzermeyer, M, 2001. Housing for the poor? negotiated housing policy in South Africa. Habitat International 25, 303–31. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(00)00037-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huchzermeyer, M, 2004. Unlawful occupation: Informal settlements and urban policy in South Africa and Brazil. Africa World Press, Trenton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Huchzermeyer, M, 2006. The new instrument for upgrading informal settlements in South Africa: contributions and constraints. In Huchzermeyer, M & Karam, A (Eds.), Informal settlements: A perpetual challenge. University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town, pp. 41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Huchzermeyer, M & Karam, A. 2006. Informal settlements: A perpetual challenge. University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Keare, D. 1983. Assessing project impacts. In Yeung, YM (Ed.), A place to live: More effective low-cost housing in Asia. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, pp. 157–70.
   Google Scholar
• Klaasen, LHJ & Van Pelt, M, 1987. Economic impact and implications of shelter investments. In Rodwin, L (Ed.), Shelter, settlement and development. Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 35–59.
   Google Scholar
• Lemanski, C, 2011. Moving up the ladder or stuck on the bottom rung? homeownership as a solution to poverty in urban South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(1), 57–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00945.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, L & Cloete, J, 2014. Dying to get a house? The health outcomes of the South African low-income housing programme. Habitat International 43(1), 48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, L & Ntema, J, 2013. The upgrading of an informal settlement in South Africa: Two decades onwards. Habitat International 39, 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, L, Ntema, L, Cloete, J & Venter, A, 2014. From informality to formality to informality: Extralegal land transfers in an upgraded informal settlement of South Africa. Urbani Izziv 25(Supplement), S148–S61. doi: 10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-supplement-011
   Google Scholar
• Marais, L, Ntema, L, Rani, K, Lenka, M & Cloete, J, 2016. Reinforcing housing assets in the wrong location? The case of Botshabelo, South Africa. Urban Forum 27(3), 347–62. doi: 10.1007/s12132-016-9276-x
   Google Scholar
• Moser, C, 2006. Asset-based approaches to poverty reduction in a globalized world. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, C & Felton, A, 2007. Intergenerational asset accumulation and poverty reduction in Guayaquil, Ecuador 1974–2004. In Moser, C (Ed.), Reducing global poverty: The case for asset accumulation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, L & Goldstein, H, 1979. The recall method in social surveys. London: University of London Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Posel, D, 2014. Self-assessed well-being and economic rank in South Africa. Development Southern Africa 31(1), 51–64. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2013.851020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakodi, C & Lloyd-Jones, T, 2002. Urban livelihoods: A people-centred approach to reducing poverty. Earthscan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A, 1993. Capabilities and well-being. In Nussbaum, M & Sen, A (Eds.), The quality of life. Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 30–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A, 2000. Development as freedoms. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sherraden, M, 1991. Assets and the poor: A new American welfare policy. M.E. Sharpe, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Shisaka Development Management Services, 2004. Workings of township residential property markets study: Phase 3 – findings, conclusions and implications – final report. FinMark Trust, Midrand.
   Google Scholar
• Shisaka Development Management Services, 2011. Housing subsidy assets: Exploring the performance of government subsidised housing in South Africa. FinMark Trust, Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, RJ & Rodell, MJ (Eds.) 1983. People, poverty and shelter: Problems of self-help housing in the third world. Methuen, London.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, R, Taylor, J & Wegelin, E (Eds.) 1987. Shelter upgrading for the poor: Evaluation of third world experience. Island Publishing House, Manila.
   Google Scholar
• Solimano, A. 2006. Asset accumulation by the middle class and poor in Latin America: Political economy and governance dimensions. United Nations, Economic Development Division, Santiago.
   Google Scholar
• Stutzer, A & Frey, B, 2010. Recent advances in the economics of individual subjective wellbeing. Social Research 77(2), 679–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M, 2006. From ‘quantity’ to ‘quality’: Restructuring South Africa’s housing policy ten years after. International Development Planning Review 28(1), 85–104. doi: 10.3828/idpr.28.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turley, R, Saith, R, Bhan, N, Rehfuess, E & Carter, B, 2013. Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review 1(CD010067). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010067.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. 1976. Housing by people: towards autonomy in building environments. Marion Byers, London.
   Google Scholar
• Venter, A, Marais, L, Hoekstra, J & Cloete, J, 2015. Reinterpreting South African housing policy through welfare state theory. Housing, Theory and Society 32(3), 346–66. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2015.1048895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank, 1993. Housing: Enabling markets to work. World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar