216
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Examining time use patterns in South Africa, 2000–2010

&

References

  • Abdourahman, OI, 2010. Time poverty: A contributor to women’s poverty? African Statistical Journal 11(4), 13–37.
  • Antonopoulos, R & Hirway, I, 2010. Unpaid work and the economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • Antonopoulos, R & Memis, E, 2010. Time and poverty from a developing country perspective. Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 600. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, New York.
  • Apps, P, 2004. Gender, time use, and models of the household. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Becker, GS, 1975. A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Bhorat, H & Van der Westhuizen, C, 2013. Non-monetary dimensions of well-being in South Africa, 1993–2004: A post-apartheid dividend. Development Southern Africa 30(3), 295–314.
  • Bhorat, H, Thornton, A, Köhler, T & Oosthuizen, M, 2020. Jobs and COVID-19: Measuring work-related physical interaction. DPRU Working Paper 202003. Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch.
  • Bianchi, SM, Milkie, MA, Sayer, LC & Robinson, JP, 2000. Is anyone doing the housework? trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces 79(1), 191–228.
  • Bonke, J, 1992. Distribution of economic resources: Implication of including household production. Review of Income and Wealth 38(3), 281–93.
  • Cha, SE & Song, YJ, 2017. Time or money: The relationship between educational attainment, income contribution, and time with children among Korean fathers. Social Indicators Research 134(1), 195–218.
  • Charmes, J, 2006. Chapter 3: A review of empirical evidence on time use in Africa from UN-sponsored surveys. In CM Blackden & Q Wodon (Eds.), Gender, time use, and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank, Washington, DC, 39–74.
  • Chiappero-Martinetti, I, 2003. Unpaid work and household well-being: A non-monetary assessment. Routledge, Oxfordshire.
  • Dermott, E & Pomati, M, 2016. ‘Good’ parenting practices: How important are poverty, education and time pressure? Sociology 50(1), 125–42.
  • Ferrant, G, 2014. Time use as a transformative indicator for gender equality in the post-2015 agenda. Technical note. OECD Development Centre, Paris.
  • Festus, L, Kasongo, A, Moses, M & Yu, D, 2016. The South African labour market, 1995–2015. Development Southern Africa 33(5), 579–99.
  • Gross, J & Swirski, B, 2002. Time use surveys and gender equality. Adva Centre, Tel Aviv.
  • Harvey, AS & Mukhopadhyay, AK, 2007. When twenty-four hours is not enough: Time poverty of working parents. Social Indicators Research 82(1), 57–77.
  • Hirway, I, 2001. Understanding children’s work in India: An analysis of their time use. Paper presented at Consultative Workshop on Food insecurity and child work in rural India, New Delhi, 15–17 March.
  • Ilahi, N & Grimard, F, 2000. Public infrastructure and private costs: Water supply and time allocation of women in rural Pakistan. Economic Development and Cultural Change 49(1), 45–75.
  • Ilahi, N, 2001. Gender and the allocation of adult time: Evidence from the Peru LSMS panel data. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Jenkins, SP & O’Leary, NC, 1997. Gender differentials in domestic work, market work, and total work time: UK time budget survey evidence for 1974/5 and 1987. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 44(2), 153–64.
  • Kim, SG, 2015. Fuzzy multidimensional poverty measurement: An analysis of statistical behaviors. Social Indicators Research 120(3), 635–67.
  • Kingdon, G & Knight, J, 2004. Unemployment in South Africa: The nature of the beast. World Development 32(3), 391–408.
  • Kizilirmak, B & Memis, E, 2009. The unequal burden of poverty on time use. Working Paper No.572. The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, New York.
  • Leibbrandt, M, Woolard, I, McEwen, H & Koep, C, 2010. Employment and inequality outcomes in South Africa. Southern Africa labour and Development Research unit. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch.
  • Mincer, J, 1974. Schooling, experience, and earnings. human behavior & Social institutions Working Paper No. 2. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Newman, CJ, 2001. Gender, time use, and change: Impacts of agricultural export employment in Ecuador. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Orkoh, E, Blaauw, PF & Claassen, C, 2020. Relative effects of income and consumption poverty on time poverty in Ghana. Social Indicators Research 147(2), 465–99.
  • Ribeiro, LL & Marinho, E, 2012. Time poverty in Brazil: Measurement and analysis of its determinants. Estudos Econômicos 42(2), 285–306.
  • Saqib, N-U & Arif, GM, 2012. Time poverty, work status and gender: The case of Pakistan. PIDE-working papers 2012:81. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.
  • Sharp, DC, Ciscel, DH & Heath, JA, 1998. Back to Becker: Valuing women's economic contribution from housework with household production functions. Journal of Forensic Economics 11(3), 215–35.
  • Statistics South Africa, 2001. A survey of time use: How South Africa women and men spend their time. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.
  • Statistics South Africa, 2013. A survey of time use, 2010. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.
  • Van der Berg, S, Nieftagodien, S & Burger, R, 2003. Consumption patterns and living standards of the black population in perspective. Paper presented at the Economics Society of South Africa Conference, Somerset West, 3–5 September.
  • Verbeek, M, 2008. A guide to modern econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, NJ.
  • Vyas, S & Kumaranayake, L, 2006. Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal component analysis. Health Policy and Planning 21(6), 459–68.
  • Walker, KE, 1973. Household work time: Its implication for family decisions. Journal of Home Economics 65(4), 7–11.
  • Weinrobe, M, 1974. Household production and national production: An improvement of the record. Review of Income and Wealth 20(1), 89–102.
  • White, J, 2016. Education, time-poverty and well-being. Theory and Research in Education 14(2), 213–25.
  • Wooldridge, JM, 2012. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. 5th edition. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.