Trade potential of Rwanda: Policy implications from taxonomic analysis of quality of institutions

References

• Acemoglu, D, Johnson, S & Robinson, J, 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development:An Empirical investigation. American Economic Review Volume 91, 369–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpan, F & Atan, J, 2016. Relationship between trade openness, institutions and Economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A further look at the evidence. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade 15, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, I, Barbero, J, Rodríguez-Pose, A & Zofío, J, 2018. Does institutional quality matter for trade? institutional conditions in a sectoral trade framework. World Development 103, 72–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J & Marcouiller, D, 2002. Insecurity and the Pattern of trade: An Empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 342–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J, 2005. Trade and informal institutions. In EKCaJC Hartigan (Ed.), Handbook of International trade: Economic andLegal analysis of laws and institutions. 279–293. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Arshavskiy, V, Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, A & Mazol, A, 2019. Institutions and comparative advantage in services trade. https://freepolicybriefs.org/2019/06/03/institutions-and-comparative-advantage-in-services-trade/[Accessed 23.9.2020].
   Google Scholar
• Bano, S, Takahashi, Y & Scrimgeour, F, 2013. ASEAN-New Zealand trade relations and trade potential. Evidence and Analysis, Journal of Economic Integration 28(1), 144–182.
   Google Scholar
• Behar, A & Venables, AJ, 2011. Transport costs and international trade. In André de Palma, Robin Lindsey, Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (Eds.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 5. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brunetti, A & Weder, B, 1998. Investment and institutional Uncertainty: A comparative study of different Uncertainty measures. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 134, 513–33.
   Google Scholar
• Business Anti-Corruption Portal, 2017. http://www.business-anti-corruption.com/[Accessed 20.5.2017].
   Google Scholar
• Cernat, L, 2003. Assessing south regional integration: Same issues, many metrics. Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series, Issue 21.
   Google Scholar
• Cieślik, E, 2018. Assessing rwanda’s economic potential from an international perspective. East Africa Research Papers in Business, Entrepreneurship and Management, Jönköping International Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Cieślik, E, 2020. Does China use its trade potential in the belt and road initiative properly? The relations between Chinese value added and trade potential in the European countries: bottom-up analysis. China Economic Journal 13(3), 339–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieślik, E, Biegańska, J & Środa-Murawska, S, 2021. Central and Eastern European States from an International Perspective: Economic Potential and paths of participation in Global value chains. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade 57(13).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Weinstein, D., 2001. An account of global factor trade. American Economic Review 91 (5), 1423–1453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, H, Linders, G, Rietveld, P & Subramanian, U, 2004. The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos 57, 103–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, F & Hu, C, 2016. Institutional differences and the direction of bilateral foreign direct Investment flows: Are South–South flows any different than the rest? The World Economy 39(2), 2000–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A, 2004. Lawlessness and economics: alternative modes of governance. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Dollar, D & Kraay, A, 2003. Institutions, trade and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 133–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duc, C, Lavallée, E & Siroën, J, 2004. The gravity of institutions. Economie Internationale Volume 113, 95–113.
   Google Scholar
• Duodu, E, Baidoo, S & Lau, E, 2020. How does quality of institutions affect the impact of trade openness on economic growth of Ghana? Cogent Economics and Finance.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Council, 2020. Taxation: EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-list-of-non-cooperative-jurisdictions/[Accessed 12.9.2020].
   Google Scholar
• Francois, J & Manchin, M, 2013. Institutions, infrastructure, and trade. World Development 46, 165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giavazzi, F & Tabellini, G, 2005. Economic and political liberalizations. Journal of Monetary Economics 52, 1297–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G & Helpman, E, 1991. Innovation and growth in the Global economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guiso, L, Sapienza, P & Zingales, L, 2009. Cultural biases in Economic exchange? Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(3), 1095–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R & Jones, C, 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 83–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havrylyshyn, O, 2010. Trade and institutional environment: The international experience and a proposed agenda of measures for CAREC Countries. Reference Documen tFor Session 4 of the Trade Policy Coordinating Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Hellwig, Z, 1968. Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr. Przegląd Statystyczny Volume 4, 307–327.
   Google Scholar
• Helmers, C & Pasteels, J, 2006. Assessing the bilateral trade potential at the commodity level: An operational approach. ITC Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• The Heritage Foundation, 2020. Index of Economic Freedom. http://www.heritage.org/index/[Accessed 14.3.2020].
   Google Scholar
• Hines, J, 2007. Tax Havens. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition. s.n.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G, 2006. What Are institution? Journal of Economic Issues 40(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFC, The World Bank, 2020. Doing Business report 2020. s.n, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasinghe, S & Sarker, R, 2008. Effects of Regional trade agreements on trade in agrifood products: Evidence from gravity modeling using disaggregated data. Review of Agriculture Economics 30(1), 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson Cornel University, INSEAD, WIPO, 2019. The Global innovation index 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Jude, C & Levieuge, G, 2017. Growth effect of Foreign Direct Investment in developing economies: the role of institutional quality. The World Economy 40(4), 715–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, S & Salim, R, 2011. Parallel Integration and ASEAN-EU trade potential: An Empirical analysis. Journal of Economic Integration 26(4), 601–623.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P, 1987. Is free trade passe? Journal of Economic Perspectives 1(2), 131–141.
   Google Scholar
• Lambsdorff, J, 1998. An Empirical Investigation of bribery in International trade. European Journal of Development Research 10, 40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Lavallée, E, 2006. Similarité institutionnelle, qualité des institutions et commerce international. Economie Internationale n° 108(4), 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• Levchenko, A, 2007. Institutional quality and International trade. Review of Economic Studies 74(3), 791–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, F & Fu, D, 2016. Trade, institution quality and income inequa. World Development 77, 129–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lira, J, Wagner, W & Wysocki, F, 2002. Mediana w zagadnieniach porządkowania obiektów wielocechowych [Median in the ordering issues of multivariable objects]. In: Martin, W. G., 2013. South Africa and the World Economy: Remaking Race, State, and Region. University of Rochester.
   Google Scholar
• Mauro, P, 1995. Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 681–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo Ibrahim Foundation, 2020. 2019 Ibrahim Index of African Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherji, I, 2007. Asia-Pacific trade agreement: Implications of exchange of trade preferences. UNESCAP 3 (1), 87–144.
   Google Scholar
• Niyongabo, G, 2004. Trade openness policy, quality of institutions and economic growth. Clermont Ferrand, France: Centre d’Etudes et de Recherche sur le Développement International.
   Google Scholar
• North, D, 1990. Institutions, institutional change and Economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, N, 2007. Relationship-specificity, incomplete contracts and the pattern of trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, 569–600.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, N & Trefler, D, 2014. Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantange. In EH a & KR Gita Gopinath (Eds.), Handbook of International economics, 263–315. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M, Sarna, N & Svamy, N, 2000. Governance andgrowth: A simple hypothesis explaining cross-country differences in productivity growth. public choice. Volume 102, 341–64.
   Google Scholar
• Pant, B & Panta, R, 2009. Export diversification and competitiveness: Nepal’s experience. NRB Economic Review Volume 21, 52–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pastore, F, Ferragina, M & Giovannetti, G, 2009. Tale of Parallel integration processes: A gravity analysis of EU Trade with Mediterranean and Central and Eastern European countries. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance 5(2), 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Paswan, N, 2003. Complementarity and trade potential in India’s trade in Agricultural food products Agricultural trade in South Asia: potential and policy options. New Delhi: APH Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Perugini, C. & Pompei, F., 2017. Temporary jobs, institutions, and wage inequality within education groups in central-Eastern Europe. World Developmen, 92, p. 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan, P & Lee, J, 2007. Contract enforcement and International trade. Economics and Politics 19(2), 191–218.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters, 2019. EU removes UAE, Switzerland, Mauritius from tax haven lists. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-taxation-blacklist-idUSKBN1WP0SP[Accessed 13 9 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A & Storper, M, 2006. Better rules or stronger communities? On the social foundations of institutional change and its economic effects. Economic Geography 82, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A, 2013. Do institutions matter for Regional development? Regional Studies 47(7), 1034–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D, 2006. Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? A Review of the World bank’s Economic growth in the 1990s: learning from a decade of reform. Journal of Economic Literature 44, 973–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D, Subramanian, A & Trebbi, F, 2004. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions, Geography and inte-gration in Economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 9, 131–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J & Warner, A, 1995. Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–118.
   Google Scholar
• Sala-i-Martin, X, 1997. I just ran two million regressions. American Economic Review Volume 87(2), 178–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency.org, 2020. Corruption Perception Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi[Accessed 4.5.2020].
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD, 2020. UNCTAD Database. Available at: www.unctad.org[Accessed 23.9.2020].
   Google Scholar
• Vinaye, A, 2009. Assessing the SADC’s potential to promote intra-regional trade in Agricultural goods. University of Mauritius, Reduit.
   Google Scholar
• Viner, J, 1950. The customs union issue. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WTO, 2003. Fundamental Economic Factors Affecting International Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S, Beugelsdijk, S & de Haan, J, 2015. Trade, trust and the rule of law. European Journal of Political Economy 37, 102–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yushi, J & Borojo, D, 2019. The impacts of institutional quality and infrastructure on overall and intra-Africa trade. Open-Assessment E-Journal Volume 13, 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar