Co-production to reframe state practices in informal settlements: Lessons from Malawi Kamp and Klipheuwel in Cape Town, South Africa

References

• Adams, EA & Boateng, GO, 2018. Are urban informal communities capable of co-production? The influence of community-public partnerships on water access in Lilongwe, Malawi. Environment and Urbanisation 30(2), 461–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L, 2013. Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a co-production perspective. Planning Theory 12(1), 46–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendse, WGJ, 2017. Klipheuwel & Goliath Estate Informal settlements strategic planning workshop report 2017. Department of Social Development & Early Childhood Development. City of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Benit-Gbaffou, C, 2018. Why is co-management of parks not working in Johannesburg? The difficult reframings of state mandate and practices in post-apartheid South Africa. In Ammann, C & Forster, T (Eds.), African cities and the development conundrum – international development policy series 10. Graduate Institute of International Development Studies, Geneva, 101–135.
   Google Scholar
• Betancourt, DS & Vivier, E, 2019. Action and community-based research: Improving Local Governance practices through community scorecard (Chapter 23). http://www.jstor.org/stable/10. 18772/22019032750.28 Accessed 20 May 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Luthango, M, 2015. Commenting on local development: Insights from Philippi. In Brown-Luthango, M (Ed.), State/society synergy in Philippi, Cape Town. African Centre for Cities, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Chiguvare, B, 2015. Klipheuwel Movement responds to City Councillor. https://www.groundup.org.za/article/dispute-over-who-represents-residents-informal-settlement_3592/ Accessed 10 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• City of Cape Town, 2013. 2011 Census Suburb Klipheuwel. Strategic Development Information and GIS Department. City of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• De Lille, P & Kesson, C, 2017. View from City Hall. Reflections on governing Cape Town. Jonathan Ball Publishers, Jeppestown.
   Google Scholar
• Drivdal, L, 2015. Practices of civic organisation in a fragmented institutional context: A case study of the formation and demise of a civic organisation in Philippi, Cape Town. In Brown-Luthango, M (Ed.), State/society synergy in Philippi, Cape Town. African Centre for Cities, Cape Town, 200–221.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Peter, 1996. State-Society Synergy: government action and social capital in development. International and Area Studies Publications 94.
   Google Scholar
• Feni, M, 2016. The forgotten people of the Western Cape. https://www.groundup.org.za/article/forgotten-people-western-cape/ Accessed 7 January 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J, 2006. Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin 37(6), 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G, 2019. The problem and promise of coproduction: Politics, history, and autonomy. World Development 122, 501–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gqirana, T, 2015. Klipheuwel Informal Settlement residents to march on parliament. News 24. https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/klipheuwel-informal-settlement-residents-to-march-on-parliament-20151203 Accessed 12 December 2020.
   Google Scholar
• GreenCape, 2019. Intervention Brief Malawi Camp. The Alternative Service Delivery Unit. https://www.greencape.co.za/content/sector/the-alternative-service-delivery-unit Accessed 7 July 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hordijk, M & Baud, I, 2006. The role of research and knowledge generation in collective action and urban governance: How can researchers act as catalysts? Habitat International 30, 668–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huchzermeyer, M & Karam, A, 2006. Informal settlements: A perpetual challenge? UCT Press, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P, 2018. Community management or co-production: The role of state and citizens in rural water delivery in India. Water Alternative 11(2), 357–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A & Moore, M, 2004. Institutional co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. The Journal of Development Studies 40(4), 31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, B, 2019. Joshua Trust: Klipheuwel Business Plan. www.josiahtrust.org.za Accessed 7 January 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Mcgranahan, G, 2015. Realising the right to sanitation in deprived urban communities: Meeting the challenges of collective action, co-production, affordability and housing tenure. World Development 68, 242–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgranahan, G & Mitlin, D, 2016. Learning from sustained success: How community-driven initiatives to improve urban sanitation can meet the challenges. World Development 87, 307–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, R, Spronk, S & Coswell, C, 2014. Popular participation, equity and co-production of water and sanitation services in Caracas, Venezuela. Water International 39(2), 201–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F, 2004. Invited and invented spaces of participation: Neoliberal citizenship and feminists expanded notion of politics. Wagadu 1, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Misselhorn, M, 2008. Position paper on informal settlement upgrading, part of a strategy for the office of the South African presidency. Urban LandMark, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D, 2008. Within and beyond the state: Co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organisations. Environment and Urbanisation 20(2), 339–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D & Bartlett, S, 2018. Editorial: Co-production – key ideas. Environment and Urbanisation 30(2), 355–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretto, L, Faldi, G, Ranzato, M, Rosati, FN, Boozi, J-P & Teller, J, 2018. Challenges of water and sanitation services co-production in the Global South. Environment and Urbanisation 30(2), 425–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpe, R & Ogra, A, 2014. Making great places in slums / informal settlements. Conference proceedings: Planning Africa 2014 – making great places, 19–22 October, International Convention Centre, Durban, SA.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T, Sancino, A & Sicilia, M, 2017. Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when and what of co-production. Public Administration Review 77(5), 766–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E, 1996. Crossing the great divide: Co-production, synergy and development. World Development 24(6), 1073–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Monitoring Group (PMG), 2020. Urbanization. https://pmg.org.za/page/Urbanisation Accessed 28 October 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, J & Pointer, G, 2019. From citizen control to co-production. Journal of the American Planning Association 85(3), 335–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancino, A, 2016. The meta co-production of community outcomes: Towards a citizens’ capabilities approach. Voluntas 27, 409–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shand, W, 2018. Making spaces for co-production: Collaborative action for settlement upgrading in Harare, Zimbabwe. Environment and Urbanisation 30(2), 519–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, W, Durakovic, E, Smon, D, Dymitrow, M, Haysom, G, Hemstrom, K & Riise, J, 2021. The challenge of conflicting rationalities about urban development: Experiences from Mistra Urban Futures transdisciplinary urban research. Trialog 137, 31–7.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, J & Spire, Z, 2020. The role of informal conversations in generating data, and the ethical and methodological issues they raise. Forum Qualitative Social Research 21(1), 1–22. Art. 10. doi:10.17169/fqs-21.1.3344 Accessed 10 September 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V, 2014. Co-production and collaboration in planning: The difference. Planning Theory and Practice 15(1), 62–76.
   Google Scholar