Characteristics, enablers and barriers affecting entrepreneurial behaviour for academics in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review

References

• Ajzen, I, 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Bader, S, Daar, AS & Singer, PA, 2010. Science-based health innovation in Ghana: health entrepreneurs point the way to a new development path. BMC International Health and Human Rights 10(1), S2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albats, E, Alexander, A, Cunningham, J & Miller, K, 2018. Entrepreneurial academics and academic entrepreneurs: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology Management 77(1/2/3), 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H & O’Malley, L, 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(1), 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A, 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 37(2), 122–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behroozi, M, 2012. Survey on university role in preparation graduated students in to entrepreneurs universities towards a conceptual framework: Iran's perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 2414–2418.
   Google Scholar
• Belitski, M, Aginskaja, A & Marozau, R, 2019. Commercializing university research in transition economies: technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding? Research Policy 48(3), 601–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broström, A, Buenstorf, G & McKelvey, M, 2021. The knowledge economy, innovation and the new challenges to universities: introduction to the special issue. Innovation 23(2), 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Cantu-Ortiz, FJ, Galeano, N, Mora-Castro, P & Fangmeyer, J Jr, 2017. Spreading academic entrepreneurship: made in Mexico. Business Horizons 60(4), 541–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y, Chen, M, Hua, M & Yang, P, 2006. Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: towards a ‘scientific–economic’ framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73(2), 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covidence Software, 2020. https://www.covidence.org. Accessed 15 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Dabic, M, Gonzalez-Loureiro, M & Daim, T, 2015. Unraveling the attitudes on entrepreneurial universities: The case of Croatian and spanish universities. Technology in Society 42.
   Google Scholar
• Dalmarco G, Hulsink W & Blois GV, 2018. Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 135, 99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H, 1983. Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva 21(2-3), 198–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H, 2013. Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Science Information 52, 486–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, BB, de Moraes, GHSM & Schaeffer, PR, 2019. Universities’ institutional settings and academic entrepreneurship: notes from a developing country. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 147, 243–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, JS, Gonçalves, CA, Cheng, LC & Muniz, RM, 2013. Structuration aspects in academic spin-off emergence: A roadmap-based analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80(6), 1162–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethner, M, Obschonka, M, Silbereisen, R & Cantner, U, 2012. Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: economic and psychological determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology 33, 628–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünhagen, M & Volkmann, CK, 2014. Antecedents of academics’ entrepreneurial intentions - developing a people-oriented model for university entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 6(2), 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M & Urbano, D, 2017. The impact of triple helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations’ performance: an inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 119, 294–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F, Restubog, SLD, Cui, L, Zou, B & Choi, Y, 2019. What determines the entrepreneurial success of academics? navigating multiple social identities in the hybrid career of academic entrepreneurs. Journal of Vocational Behavior 112, 241–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gur, U, Oylumlu, IS & Kunday, O, 2017. Critical assessment of entrepreneurial and innovative universities index of Turkey: Future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 123, 161–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng, LH, Rasli, AM & Senin, AA, 2012. Knowledge determinant in university commercialization: A case study of Malaysia public university. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 40, 251–257.
   Google Scholar
• Kafouros M, Wang C & Piperopoulos P, 2015. Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions. Research Policy 44(3), 803–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, N, 1993. The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of New venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18(1), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, N, 2000. The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 24(3), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, N, 2009. Entrepreneurial Intentions are dead: long live Entrepreneurial Intentions. In A Carsrud & M Brännback (Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind. International studies in entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY, 24.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, N & Brazeal, DV, 1994. Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Iberoamerican Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 7(2), 201–226.
   Google Scholar
• Lubango, LM, 2015. The effect of co-inventors’ reputation and network ties on the diffusion of scientific and technical knowledge from academia to industry in South Africa. World Patent Information 43, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lubango, LM & Pouris, A, 2007. Industry work experience and inventive capacity of South African academic researchers. Technovation 27(12), 788–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkosi, T, Aboginije, A, Mashwama, N & Thwala, W, 2020. Harnessing Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) for improving poor universities infrastructure in developing countries-a review. Proceedings of the International conference on industrial engineering and operations Management dubai, UAE, March 10-12, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M, Godfrey, C, McInerney, P, Soares, C, Khalil, H & Parker, D, 2015. Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. In E Aromataris (Ed.), Ed. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers manual 2015. The Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia, pp.3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K, 2016. The fourth industrial revolution: what it means, how to respond. World Economic Forum 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Shapero, A & Sokol, L, 1982. Social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C Kent, D Sexton & K Vesper (Eds.), The encyclopedia of entrepreneurship. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 72–90.
   Google Scholar
• Sutter, C, Bruton, GD & Chen, J, 2019. Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: A review and future research directions. Journal of Business Venturing 34(1), 197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, E & Pugh, R, 2020. From ‘entrepreneurial’ to ‘engaged’ universities: social innovation for regional development in the global south. Regional Studies 54(12), 1631–1643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivarelli, M, 2012. Entrepreneurship in Advanced and Developing Countries: A Microeconomic Perspective- Discussion Paper No. 6513.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Task Force on Higher Education in Developing Countries, 2000. Higher education in developing countries: peril and promise. World Bank (20182).
   Google Scholar