Recognition and Position Determination of Partially Occluded Object for a Computer Vision System

REFERENCE

• D Dutta Majumder, Computer vision and knowledge based computer system, JIETE, vol 34, pp 230–245, May-June 1988.
   Google Scholar
• D Dutta Majumder, A unified approach to artificial intelligence, pattern recognition image processing and computer vision in fifth generation computer systems, Information Sciences, Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc New York vol 45, pp 391–431, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• D Dutta Majumder, Pattern recognition, image processing artificial intelligence and computer vision in fifth generation computer systems, Sadhana, Proc Inc Acad Sci, Bangalore, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S Ray & D Dutta Majumder, Application of differential geometry to recognize and locate partially occluded objects, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol 9, pp 351–360, Sept 1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Dutta Majumder, S K Parui & D K Banerjee, Shape based object recognition, NCKBCS Technical Report, Indian Statistical Inst, Calcutta, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• S K Parui & D Dutta Majumder, A new definition of shape similarity, Pattern Recognition letters, vol 1, pp 37–42, 1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S K Parui & D Dutta Majumder, Shape similarity measures for open curves, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol 1, pp 129–134, 1983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B B Chaudhuri & D Dutta Majumder, Recognition and fuzzy description of sides and symmetries of figures by computers, Int J Syst Science, vol 11, pp 1435–1445, 1980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T F Knoll & R C Jain, Recognizing partially vision objects using feature indexed hypotheses, IEEE J Robotics and Automation, vol RA-2, pp 3–13, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• P J Besl & R C Jain, An overview of three-dimensional object recognition. RSD-TR-19-M, Center for Robotics and Integrated manufacturing, Univ of Mich, Ann Arbor, December, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• G Meddioni & Y Yasumoto, Corner detection and curve representation using cubic B-splines, Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing, vol 39, pp 367–278, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• N Ayache, A model-based vision system to indentify and locate partially visible industrial parts, Proc computer vision and pattern recognition, Washington, DC, pp 492–494, June 1983.
   Google Scholar
• P J Besl & R C Jain, Surface characterization for three dimensional object recognition in depth map, RSP-TR-20-84, Center for Robotics and Integrated manufacturing, Univ of Mich, Ann, Arber, December, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• C C Hsiung, A first course in differential geometry, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• G Stockman, S Kopstein & S Benelt, Matching images to models for registration and object detection via clustering, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell. pp 229–241, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• J Serra, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Academic Pres, London 1982.
   Google Scholar
• A Rosenfeld & A Kak, Digital picture processing, 2nd ed, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• D Marr, Vision, San Francisco, CA: Freeman Palvidis, T, Algorithms for graphics and image processing, Rockvile, MD: Computer Science Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• G Medioni & A Huertas, Edge detection with subpixel precicion, Technical report USCISG 106, University of Southern California, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• U Montanari, A note on minimal length-polygonal approximation to a digitized contour, Communication ACM, vol 13, pp 41–47, 1970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H Asda & M Brady, The curvature primal sketch, Proc of the 2nd IEEE workshop on computer vision: Representation and Control, Annapolis, MD, May, 8–17, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• M L James, G M Smith & J C Wolford, Applied numerical methods for digital computation Harher and ROW New York, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• M W Koch & R L Kashyap, Computer vision algorithms to recognize and locate partially oocluded objects, Tech Rep TR-ERC-86-2, Eng Res Center, Perdue Univ, Dec 1985.
   Google Scholar
• D H Ballard, Viewer independent shape recognition, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell, vol 5, pp 653–660, 1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H Hakalathi, D Harwood & L Davis, Two-dismensional object recognition by matching local properties of contour points, Pattern Recognition lett, vol 2, pp 227–234, 1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R C Bolles & R A Chain, Recognizing and locating partially visible objects: The focus feature method, Int 5 Robotics Res, vol 1, pp 57–81, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• E Grimson & T Lozano-Pirez, Recognition and localization of overlapping parts from sparse data in two and three dimensions, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics, St Louis, MO, pp 61–66, Mar 1985.
   Google Scholar
• M Fischler & R Bolles, Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with application to image analysis and automated cartography, Graphics and Image Processing, vol 24, pp 381–395, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• M I Shamos & D Hoey, Closest point problems, Sixteenth Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp 157–162, October, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• B K P Horn, Understanding image intensities, Artificial Intell vol 8, pp 201–231, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W E L Grimson, A computer implementation of a theory of human tereo vision, MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab Memo-565, 1980, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
   Google Scholar
• R Jain, Dynamic scene analysis, in progress in Pattern Recognition, vol 2, (Eds), A Rosenfeld & L Kanal, North Holland, Amsterdam, The Natherlands 1983.
   Google Scholar
• S Ullman, The Interpretation of visual motion, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• K Ikeuchi & B K P Horn, Numerical shape from shading and occluding boundaries, Artificial Intell, vol 17, pp 141–184, Aug 1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E N Coleman & R Jain, Obtained shape of textured and specular surfaces using four-source photometry, Computer Graphics Image Processing, vol 18, pp 309–328, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• R J Woodham, Analysing images of curved surfaces, Artificial Intell, vol 17, pp 117–140, Aug, 1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A P Witkin, Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture, Artificial Intell, vol 17, pp 17–45, 1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T Kanade, Recovery of the three-dimensional shape of an object from a single view, Artificial Intell, vol 17, pp 409–460, 1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Nivatia & T O Bingord, Description and recognition of curved objects, Artificial Intell, vol 8, pp 77–78, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D T Kuan & R J Drazaich, Model-based interpretation of range imagery, Proc of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, Tex, pp 210–215, Aug 1984.
   Google Scholar
• D R Smith & T Kanade, Autonomous scene description with range imagery, Proc of the Image Understanding Workshop New Orleans, La, DRAPA, Science Applications, Mc Lean, Va, pp 282–290, Oct 1984.
   Google Scholar
• D B Gennery, Object detection and measurement using stereo vision, Proc of the 6th International Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence, Tokyo, Japan, pp 320–327, Aug 1979.
   Google Scholar
• B Boyter & J K Aggarwal, Recognition with range and intensity data, Proc of workshop on computer vision: representation and control, Annapalis, Md, IEEE New York, pp 112–117, Apr 30 May 2, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• B Bhanu, Representation and shape matching of 3D objects, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell, vol 6, pp 340–350, 1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P Haraud & R C Bolls, 3DPO's strategy for matching three-dimensional objects in range data, Proc of the International Conf on Robotics, Atlanta, Ga, IEEE, New York, 13–15, Mar pp 78–85, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• M Oshima & Y Shirai, Object recognition using three-dimensional information, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Intell, vol 5, pp 353–361, 1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O D Faugeras, New steps towards a flexible 3D vision system for robotics, Proc of the 7th International Conf on Pattern Recognition, Montreal, Canada, IEEE New York, pp 796–805, July 30-Aug 2, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• P J Basi & R C Jain, Invarient surface characteristics for 3D object recognition in range images, Computer Vision, Graphics and Processing, vol 33, pp 33–80, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• K S Ray & D Dutta Majumder, Application of differential geometry to recognize and locate partially occluded objects, Pattern Recognition letter, vol 9, pp 351–360, 1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M P Docarmo, Differential geometry of curves and surfaces, Prentice-Hall Inc, Engleewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 134–156, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• B C Vemuri, A Mitiche & J K Aggarwal, 3D object representation from range data using intrinsic surface properties in Three Dimensional Machine Vision, (Eds, T Kanade, Kluwer), Academic Publishers, pp 241–266, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• A K Cline, Surface smoothing by splines under tension, Technical Report CAN-168, Univ of Texas at Austin, Dept of CS, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• M Oshima & Y Shirai, Object recognition using three dimensional information, Proc of the 7th International joint conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, BC, Canada, IJCAI, pp 601–606, 24–28 Aug, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• A Roy Plastock, & G Kalley, Computer graphics, (Schaum's Outline, series in computers) McGrawHill, International Editions, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• D H Ballard & C M Brown, Computer Vision, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• B Carnahan, H A Luther & J O Wilkes, Applied numerical methods, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• J C Hay, Optical motions and space perception: an extension of Gibson's analysis, Psychd Rev, vol 73, pp 550–565, 1966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estimating three-dimensional motion parameters of a rigid planar patch II, singular value decomposition, IEEE Trans Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol 30, pp 525–534, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• H C Longuet Higgins, The reconstruction of a scene from two projections: Configurations that defeat the 8-point algorithm, IEEE Proceedings of the first conf on AI applications, pp 395–397, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• H C Longuet Higgins, The visual ambiguity of a moving plane, Proc R Soc London, vol B223, pp 165–175, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• H C Longuet Higgins, The reconstruction of a plane surface from two perspective projections, Proc R Soc, London, vol B 227, pp 399–410, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• H C Longuet Higgins, Multiple interpretation of a pair of images of a surface, Proc R Soc, London, vol A418 pp 1–15 1988.
   Google Scholar
• S J Maybank, The angular velocity associated with the optical flow field arising from motion throw a rigid environment, Proc R Soc, London, vol A 401, pp 317–326, 1985.
   Google Scholar