Dependable Transaction Management over a Network of Real-Time Databases

REFERENCES

• A Burns & A J Wellings, Criticality and Utility in the Next Generation, The Journal of Real-time Systems, vol 3, pp 351–354, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• T Ozsu, Dayal & P Valduriez (Eds), Distributed Object Management, Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• K Eswaran, J Gray, R Lorie & I Traiger, The Notions of Consistency and Predicate Locks in a Database System, Communications of the ACM, Nov 1976.
   Google Scholar
• P G Reddy, S Bhalla, & B E Prasad, A Model of Concurrency Control in Distributed Database Systems, Information Processing Letters, North Holland, vol 14, no 5, July 1982.
   Google Scholar
• M J Carey, Improving the Performance of an Optimistic Concurrency Control Algorithm through Time Stamps and Versions, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol SE-13, no 6, June 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S Cheng, J A Stankovic & K Ramamritham, Scheduling Algorithm for Hard Real Time Systems—A Brief Survey, Tutorial: Hard Real Time Systems, Computer Society Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• K Ramamritham, Real-Time Databases, Distributed and Parallel Databases, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, vol 1, no 1, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• A Buchmann, D McCarthy, M Hsu & U Dayal, Time Critical Database Scheduling: A Framework for Integrating Real-Time Scheduling and Concurrency Control, Proc 5th Intl Conference on Data Engineering, Feb 1989.
   Google Scholar
• J Stankovic & W Zhao, On Real Time Transactions, ACM SIGMOD Record, March 1988.
   Google Scholar
• R Abbott & H Garcia-Molina, Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A performance Evaluation, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol 17, no 3, Sept 1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G Ozsoyoglu, Real-Time Databases: Are they Real, Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Annual Conference, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• H Chetto & M Chetto, Some Results of the earliest Deadline Scheduling Algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol SE-15, no 10, Dec 1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V Gafni, A Model for a Hard Real-Tome System Executive, Real-Time Programming Proceedings of the 15th IFAC/IFIP Workshop, Valencia, Spain, May 1988.
   Google Scholar
• D Hong, T Johnson & S Chakravarthy, Real-Time Transaction Scheduling: A Cost Conscious Approach, ACM SIGMOD Annual Conference, ACM SIGMOD Record, vol 22, Issue 2, June 1993.
   Google Scholar
• W Zhao, K Ramamritham & J A Stankovic, Scheduling Tasks with Resource Requirements in Hard Real Time Systems, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol SE-13, no 5, May 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Abbott & H Garcia-Molina, Scheduling Real-Time Transactions with Disk Resident Data, Proceedings of the 15th VLDB Conference, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• J Haritsa, M Carey & M Livny, Dynamic Real-Time Optimistic Concurrency Control, Processing of 11th IEEE Real Time Systems Symposium, Dec 1990.
   Google Scholar
• W S Kim & J Srivastava, Enhancing Real Time DBMS Performance with Multiversion Data and Priority Based Disk Scheduling, Proceedings of IEEE Real Time Systems Symposium, Dec 1991.
   Google Scholar
• L Sha, R Rajkumar & J P Lehoczky, Concurrency Control for Distributed Real Time Databases, ACM SIGMOD Record, March 1988.
   Google Scholar
• H T Kung & J Robinson, On Optimistic Methods for Concurrency Control, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol 20, no 2, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• R Abbott & H Garcia-Molina, Scheduling Real-time Transactions: a Performance Evaluation, Proc of 14th VLDB Conference, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• C Shen, K Ramamritham & J Stankovic, Resource Reclaiming in Real-Time, Proc Real-time System Symposium, 1990, also in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, March 1993.
   Google Scholar
• S Bhalla, Transaction Management in a Database Driven Real-Time System, TENCON 91, 1991 IEEE Region 10 Conference, Aug 26–30, New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• A Chan & R Gray, Implementing Distributed Real Only Transactions, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol SE-11, no 2, Feb 1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P K Reddy & S Bhalla, Non-blocking Concurrency Control in Distributed Database Systems, Proceedings of International Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architecture Synthesis, IEEE Computer Society, pp 192–198, March 1995, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• P K Reddy & S Bhalla, A Non-Blocking Transaction Data Flow Graph Based Protocol for Replicated Databases, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol 7, no 5, pp 829–834, Oct 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Abbott & H Garcia-Molina, Scheduling I/O requests with deadlines: a performance evaluation, Proceedings of Real-Time Systems Symposium, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• M J Carey, R Jauhari & M Linvy, Priority in DBMS resource Scheduling, Proc of 15th VLDB conference, 1990, pp 397–410.
   Google Scholar
• S Chen, J Stankovic, J Kurose & D Towsley, Performance Evaluation of two new Disk Scheduling Algorithms for Real-time Systems, Real-time Systems, vol 3, no 3, pp 307–336, Sept 1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N Griffeth & A Weinrib, Scalability of a Real-time Distributed Resource Counter, Proc of Real-time Systems Symposium, Orlando, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• W Hou, G Ozsoyoglu & B K Taneja, Processing Aggregate Relational Queries with Hard Time Constraints, Proc ACM SIGMOD Intl Conf on Management of Data, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• C Pu & A Leff, Replica Control in Distributed Systems: An Asynchronous Approach, Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Annual Conference, pp 377–386, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ramamritham & P Chrysanthis, In Search of Acceptability Criteria: Database Consistency Requirements and transaction correctness properties, in Distributed Object Management, T Ozsu, Dayal, & P Valduriez (Eds), Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• H F Korth, E Levy & A Silberschatz, Compensating Transactions: a New Recovery Paradigm, Proc 16th Intl Conf Very Large Databases, Brisbane, Australia, pp 95–106, 1990.
   Google Scholar