Removal of Ocular Artifacts from EEG—A Survey

REFERENCES

• Hughes JR, EEG in Clinical Practice, Boston, MA: Butterworths, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Low MD, Borda RP, Frost JD & Kellaway P, Surface- negative, slow potential shift associated with conditioning in man, Neurology, vol 16, pp 771–782, 1966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillyard SA & Gallambos R, Eye-movement artifact in the CNV, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 28, pp 173–182, 1970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasser TH, Ziegler P & Gattaz WF, The deleterious effects of ocular artifacts on the quantitative EEG, and a remedy, European Archives of Psychiatry and clinical Neuroscience (Berlin), vol 241, pp 352–356, 1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meijel, Veelenturf & Herrmann OE, Patient independent Spike-Wave Complex Detection in EEG with an Artificial Neural Network,Proceedings of the ProRISC Workshop on Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, pp 361–364, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Donchin E, Callaway E, Cooper R, Desmedt JE, Goff WR, Hillyard SA et al, Publication criteria for studies of evoked potentials (EP) in man, Desmedt JE, ed, Attention voluntary contraction, and event related cerebral potentials (Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology), Basel: Karger; vol 1, pp 1–11, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Croft RJ & Barry RJ, Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG; a review, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 30, no 1, pp 519, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Overton DA & Shagass C, Distribution of eye movement and eye blink potentials over the scalp, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 27, p 546, 1969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton G, Coles MG & Donchin E, A new method for offline removal of ocular artifact, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 55, no 4, pp 468–484, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eelbert T, Lutzenberger W, Rockstroh B & Birbaumer, Removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG—a biophysical approach to the EOG, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 60, no 5, pp 455–463, 1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg P & Scherg M, Dipole models of eye movements and blinks, Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, vol 79, no 5, pp 36–44, 1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunia CHM, Mocks J & van den Berg-Lenssen MMC, Removing ocular artifacts artifacts while saving contaminated trials, Psychophysiology, vol 3, pp 2–13, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Gratton G, Dealing with artifacts: The EOC contamination of the event-related brain potential, Behav Res Meth Instr Comp, vol 30, pp 44–53, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Croft RJ & Barry RJ, EOG correction: Which regression should we use? Psychophysiology, vol 37, no 1, pp 123–125, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatjana Zikov, Stephane Bibian, Guy A, Dumont & Mihai Huzmezan, A wavelet based denoising technique for ocular artifact correction of the Electroencepahalogram, 24th International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Huston, Texas, October 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Corby JC & Kopell BS, Differential contributions of blinks and vertical eye movements as artifacts in EEG recording, Psychophysiology, vol 9, pp 640–644, 1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasser T, Sroka L & Mocks J, The transfer of EOG activity into the EEG for eyes open and closed, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 61, pp 181–193, 1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerts TC & Lang PJ, The effects of eye fixation and stimulus and response location on the contingent negative variation (CNV), Biological Psychology, vol 1, pp 1–19, 1973.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verleger R, The instruction to refrain from blinking affects auditory P3 and N1 amplitudes, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 78, pp 240–251, 1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Toole DM & Iacono WG, An evaluation of different techniques for removing eye-blink related artifact from the visual evoked response recordings, Psychophysiology, vol 24, pp 487–497, 1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small JG, Sensory evoked responses of autistic children, Infantile Autism, pp 224–239, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony B J, In the blink of an eye: implications of reflex modification for information processing, In PK Ackles, JR Jennings and MGH Coles (Eds.), Advances in Psychophysiology, vol 1, pp 167–218, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Verleger R, Gasser T & Mocks J, Correction of EOG artifacts in event-related potentials of the EEG: aspects of reliability and validity, Psychophysiology, vol 19, pp 472–480, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton JL Lue F & Moldofsky H, A spectral method for removing eye movement artifacts from the EEG, Electroencephalography and clinical Neurohysiology, vol 44, pp 735–741, 1978.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woestenburg JC, Verbaten MN & Slangen JL, The removal of the eye movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain, Biological Psychology, vol 16. PP 127–147, 1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenemans JL, Molenaar PC & Verbaten MN, Slangen, Removal of the ocular artifact from the EEG: a comparison of time and frequency domin methods with simulated and real data, Psychophysiology, vol 28, nol, pp 114–121, 1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft RJ & Barry RJ, EOG correction: a new perspective, Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, vol 107, no 6, pp 387–394, 1998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg P, Comments on EOG correction methods, Psychophysiologic, vol 13, pp41–44, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerlund TD, Sharbrough FW & Busacker NE, Spatial filtering of multichannel electroencephalographic recordings through principal component analysis by singular value decomposition, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 14, no 1, pp 73–82, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft RJ & Barry RJ, EOG correction: a new aligned-artifact average solution, Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, vol 107, no 6, pp 395–401, 1998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Semlitsch HV, Anderer P & Schuster P, Presslich O, A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300, Psychophysiology, vol 23, pp 695–703, 1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft RJ & Barry RJ, EOG correction of blinks with saccade coefficients: a test and revision of the aligned-artefact average solution, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 111, pp 444–451, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins, OG, Picton TW, Berg P & Scherg M, Ocular artifacts in recording EEG and event related potentials II: Source dipoles and source components, Brain topography, vol 6, pp 65–78, 1993.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg P & Scherg M, Dippole models of eye activity and its application to the removal of eye artifacts from the EEG and MEG, Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurements, vol 12, (Supplement A), pp 49–54, 1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg P & Scherg M, A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts, Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, vol 90, no 3, pp 229–241, 1994.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott Makeig, Tzyy-Ping Jung, Anthony J Bell & Terrence J Sejnowski, Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic data, Advances in Neural Information Processing System, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, vol 8, pp 145–151, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Scott Makeig, Tzyy Ping Jung, Ghahremani D & Sejnowski, Independent Component Analysis of Simulated ERP data. Institute for Neural Institute Computation Technical Report Series, INC 9606, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bell AJ & Sejnowski TJ, An information maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution, Neural Computation, vol 7, pp 1129–1159, 1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigario RN, Extraction of ocular artifacts from EEG using Independent Component Analysis, Electrencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, vol 103, pp 395–404, 1997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tzyy-Ping Jung, Scott Makeig, Colin Humphries, Te-Won Lee, Martin J Mckeown, Vincent Iragui & Terrence J Sejnowski, Extended ICA removes Artifacts from Electroencehalographic recordings, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol 10, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 894–900, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lee TW & Sejnowski T, Independent Component Analysis for Sub Gaussian and Super-Gaussian Mixtures, Proceedings of 4th Joint Symposium on Neural Computation, vol 7, pp 132–139, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Vigario R, Jaakko Sarela, Veikko Jousmaki, Matti Hamalainen & Erkki Oja, Independent Component Approach to the Analysis of EEG and MEG Recordings, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol 47, no 5, pp 589–593, May 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzyy-Ping Jung, Scott Makeig, Marissa Westerfield, Jeanne Townsend, Eric Courchesne & Terrence J Sejnowski, Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol 111, pp 1745–1758, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzyy-Ping Jung, Scott Makeig, Colin Humphries, Te-Won Lee, Martin J Mckeown, Vincent Iragui & Terrence J Sejnowski, Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation, Psychophysiology, vol 37, pp 163–178, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar