Cosine-Modulated Wavelet Packet based Texture Features for Content based Image Retrieval

REFERENCES

• Young Rui & Thomas S Huang, Image Retrieval: Current Techniques, Promising directions and open Issues, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, vol. 10, pp 39–62. 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold W M Smeulders et. al., Content-Based Image Retrieval at the end of the Early Years, IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, no 12, pp 1349–1380. Dec 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manesh Kokarc, B N Chatterji & P K Biswas, A survey on current content based image retrieval methods, IETE Journal of Research, vol 48. no. 3 & 4, pp 261–271, May-Aug 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B S Manjunath & W Y Ma, Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data, IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol 8, no 8, pp 837–842, Aug 1996.
   Google Scholar
• J R Smith & S F Chang, VisualSeek: A fully automated content based image query system, in proc of ACM International Conf Multimedia, pp 87–98, Nov 1996. Boston, M A.
   Google Scholar
• JPEG Committee. JPEG home page. [Online] http://www.jpeg.org.
   Google Scholar
• S Mallat, A Theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation, IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol 11, no 7, pp 674–693, 1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manesh Kokare, B N Chatterji & P K Biswas, M-Band wavelet based texture features for content based image retrieval, in Proc Indian Conference on Vision, Graphics and Image Processing (ICVGIP 2002), pp 173–178, Dec 2002, Ahemadabad (India).
   Google Scholar
• Pattichis M S et.al. Non-stationary texture segmentation using an AM-FM model. In Proc Int Conf. Neural Networks. vol 3, pp 1552–1557, 1997, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• T Chang & C C Kuo, Texture analysis and classification with tree-structured wavelet transform, IEEE Trans Image Processing, vol 2, no 4, pp 429–441, Oct 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christine Guillemot and Patrice Onno, Cosine-modulated wavelets: New results on design of arbitrary length filters and optimization for image compression, in Proc International Conference on Image Processing, vol 1, pp 820–824, 1994, (Austin, Texas, USA).
   Google Scholar
• His-Chin Hsin, Texture segmentation using modulated wavelet transform, IEEE Trans Image Processing, vol 9, no 7, pp 1299–1302, July 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P P Vaidyanathan, Multirate Systems and Filter Banks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• R A Gopinath & C S Burrus, Wavelets and Filter Banks, in Wavelets: A Tutorial in Theory and Applications (CK Chui, ed.) San Diego, CA: Academic, 1992, pp 603–654; Tech Report CML TR91-20, Rice University, September 1991.
   Google Scholar
• M Veterli & C Herley. Wavelets and filter banks: Theory and design, IEEE Trans Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp 2207–2232, Sept 1992.
   Google Scholar
• R D Koilpillai & P P Vaidyanathan. Cosine-modulated FIR filter bank satisfying perfect reconstruction, IEEE Trans Signal Processing, pp 770–783, April 1992.
   Google Scholar
• H S Malvar. Modulated QMF filter banks with perfect reconstruction, Electronic Letter, vol 26, pp 906–907. June 1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R A Gopinath & C S Burrus, On Cosine-modulated wavelet orthonormal bases, IEEE Trans Image Processing, vol 4, no 2, pp 162–176, Feb 1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong Man Ro et. al., MPEG-7 Homogeneous Texture Descriptor, Electronics and Telecommunication Research Institute (ETRI) Journal, vol 23. no 2, pp 41–51, June 2001.
   Google Scholar
• P Brodatz, Textures: A photographic album for artists & designers, New York: Dover, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• D H Hubel & T N Wiesel, Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex, Journal of Physiology, no 160, pp 106–154, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• J Daugman, Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profile, Journal of Visual Research, vol 20, pp 847–856, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar