Generalized Characteristic Ratios: Definition, Assignment, and Application

References

• D. Graham, and R.C. Lathrop, “The synthesis of optimum transient response: criteria and standard forms,” Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. Part II Appl. Indust., Vol. 72, pp. 273–88, Nov. 1953.
   Google Scholar
• D. Graham, and R.C. Lathrop, “Conditions that guarantees no overshoot for linear systems,” Int. J. Contr., Vol. 47, pp. 1043–59, Jul. 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.L. Moore, and S.P. Bhattacharya, “A technique for choosing zero locations for minimal overshoot,” IEEE Trans. Automatic Contr., Vol. 35, pp. 577–80, May 1990. doi: 10.1109/9.53527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Deodhare, and M. Vidyasagar, “Design of non-overshooting feedback control systems,” in Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Honolulu, Hawaii, Dec. 5–7, 1990, pp. 1827–34.
   Google Scholar
• S. Jayasuriya, and A.G. Dharne, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for non-overshooting step responses for LTI systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE American Control Conference, Anchorage, AK, USA, May 8–10, 2002, pp. 505–10.
   Google Scholar
• S. Darbha, “On the synthesis of controllers for continuous time LTI systems that achieve a non-negative impulse response,” Automatica, Vol. 39, pp. 159–65, Jan. 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00202-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Naslin, Essentials of Optimal Control. Boston: Technical Publishers, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• A.V. Lipatov, and N.I. Sokolov, “Some sufficient conditions for stability and instability of continuous linear stationary systems,” Autom. Rem. Contr., Vol. 39, pp. 1285–91, 1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Manabe, “Coefficient diagram method,” in Proceedings of the 14th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace, Seoul, Korea, Sep. 12–16, 1998, pp. 199–210,.
   Google Scholar
• S. Manabe, “Importance of coefficient diagram in polynomial method,” in Proceedings of the 42th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, USA, Dec. 9–12, 2003, pp. 3489–94.
   Google Scholar
• Y.C. Kim, L.H. Keel, and S.P. Bhattacharyya, “Transient response control via characteristic ratio assignment,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., Vol. 48, pp. 2238–44, Dec. 2003. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2003.820153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Haeri, and M.S. Tavazoei, “To determine the characteristic polynomial coefficients based on the transient response,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 2–5 Jun. 2005, pp. 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• M.S. Tavazoei, and M. Haeri, “Periodic characteristic ratio (PCR) method: an alternative method to determine the characteristic polynomial,” Math. Comput. Simulat., Vol. 80, pp. 1841–53, May 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.B. Kang, H. Rho, and H. Kim, “A new approach for transient response control via Characteristic Ratio Assignment method,” Int. J. Contr. Autom. Syst., Vol. 9, pp. 659–64, Aug. 2011. doi: 10.1007/s12555-011-0406-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Ocal, A. Bir, and B. Tibken, “Digital design of Coefficient Diagram Method,” in Proceedings of the IEEE American Control Conference, St. Louis, MO, USA, Jun. 10–12, 2009, pp. 2849–54.
   Google Scholar
• M. Haeri, and M.S. Tavazoei, “CDM-based closed-loop transfer function design for ramp input,” Trans. Inst. Meas. Contr., Vol. 33, pp. 558–72, Jul. 2011. doi: 10.1177/0142331210377098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.E. Hamamci, “A robust polynomial-based control for stable processes with time delay,” Electr. Eng., Vol. 87, pp. 163–72, Apr. 2005. doi: 10.1007/s00202-004-0237-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.E. Hamamci, “A new PID tuning method based on transient response control,” Balkan J. Electr. Comput. Eng., Vol. 2, pp. 132–38, Sep. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• M. Tabatabaei, and M. Haeri, “Characteristic ratio assignment in fractional order systems,” ISA Trans., Vol. 49, pp. 470–78, Oct. 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2010.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Tabatabaei, and M. Haeri, “Characteristic ratio assignment in fractional order systems (case 0<v≤0.5),” Trans. Inst. Meas. Contr., Vol. 35, pp. 360–74, May 2013. doi: 10.1177/0142331212451990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Kim, K. Kim, and S. Manabe, “Sensitivity of time response to characteristic ratios,” in Proceedings of the IEEE American Control Conference, Boston, MA, USA, Jun. 30–Jul. 2 2004, pp. 2723–28.
   Google Scholar
• M. Tabatabaei, and M. Haeri, “Sensitivity analysis of CRA based controllers in fractional order systems,” Signal Process., Vol. 92, pp. 2040–55, Sep. 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Tabatabaei, “Generalized characteristic ratios assignment for commensurate fractional order systems with one zero,” ISA Trans., Vol. 69, pp. 10–19, Jul. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2017.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Chestnut, and R.W. Mayer, Servomechanisms and Regulating System Design. New York: Wiley, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• R.C. Dorf, and R.H. Bishop, Modern Control systems. London: Prentice Hall, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• C.I. Muresan, C. Ionsecu, S. Folea, and R.D. Keyser, “Fractional order control of unstable processes: the magnetic levitation study case,” Nonlinear Dynam., Vol. 80, pp. 1761–72, Jun. 2015. doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1335-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar