Breast Tumor Detection in Digital Mammogram Based on Efficient Seed Region Growing Segmentation

References

• A. Jemal, R. Siegel, and E. Ward, “Cancer statistics, 2008,” CA Cancer J. Clin., Vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 71–96, 2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Hutchinson, “Breast cancer challenges, controversies, breakthroughs,” Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., Vol. 7, pp. 669–70, December 2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, G. Yu, Y. Kang, Y. Zhao, and Q. Qu, “Breast tumor detection in digital mammography based on extreme learning machine,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 175–84, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• G. Huang, H. Zhou, X. Ding, and R. Zhang, “Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber, Part B: Cybern, Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 513–29, 2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chu, H. Min, L. Liu, and W. Lu, “A novel computer aided breast mass detection scheme based on morphological enhancement and SLIC super pixel segmentation,” Med. Phys., Vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 3859–69, 2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Oliver, J. Freixenet, J. Marti, E. Perez, J. Pont, E. R. Denton, and R. Zwiggelaar, “A review of automatic mass segmentation of masses detection and segmentation in mammographic images,” Med. Image Anal., Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 87–100, 2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Tang, R. M. Rangayyan, J. Xu, L. E. I. Naqa, and Y. Yang, “Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances,” Inf. Technol. Biomed. IEEE Trans., Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 236–51, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• C. Gallego-Ortiz, and A. L. Martel, “Improving the accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis for breast MR imaging by differentiating between mass and non-mass lesions,” Radiology, Vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 679–88, 2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, J. Feng, Q. Bu, F. Liu, M. Zhang, Y. Ren, and Y. Lv, “Breast mass detection in digital mammogram based on Gestalt psychology,” Hindwai J. Healthc. Eng., Vol. 2018, pp. 1–13, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• L. Zheng, and A. K. Chan, “An artificial intelligent algorithm for tumor detection in screening mammogram,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 559–67, July 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. N. Shah, T. V. Ratanpara, and C. K. Bhensdadia, “Early breast cancer tumor detection on mammogram images,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., Vol. 87, no. 14, pp. 114–20, Feburary 2014.
   Google Scholar
• S. M. Badawy, A. A. Hefnawy, H. E. Zidan, and M. T. Gadallah, “Breast cancer detection with mammogram segmentation: A qualitative study,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., Vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 117–20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• N. Dhungel, G. Carneiro, and A. P. Bradley, “A deep learning approach for the analysis of masses in mammograms with minimal user intervention,” Med. Image Anal., Vol. 37, pp. 114–28, 2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Casti, A. Mencattini, M. Salmeri, A. Ancona, F. Mangeri, M. L. Pepe, and R. M. Rangayyan, “Contour independent detection and classification of mammographic lesions,” Biomed. Signal. Process. Control., Vol. 25, pp. 165–77, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Petrick, H. P. Chan, B. Sahiner, and D. Wei, “An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Adams, and L. Bischof, “Seed region growing,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., Vol. 16, pp. 641–7, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Melouah, and S. Layachi. “A novel automatic seed placement approach for region growing segmentation in mammograms” IPAC’15 November 23–25, 2015, Batna, Algeria @2015 ACM. ISBN: 978-1-4503-3458-7/15/11.
   Google Scholar
• M. M. Saleek, and A. EI Moutaouakkil, “Automatic Seeded region growing based on texture features for mass segmentation in digital mammography,” Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Commun. Syst., Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., Vol. 640, pp. 331–8, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• J. Suckling, et al. Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) database v1.21 [Dataset] 2015. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/250394.
   Google Scholar
• F. Y. Shih, and S. Cheng, “Automatic seeded region growing for color image segmentation,” Image. Vis. Comput., Vol. 23, pp. 877–86, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Qusay, et al. “Breast MRI tumor segmentation using modified automatic seeded region growing based on particle swarm optimization image clustering” Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, Advances in Intelligent systems and computing 223, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00930-8-5 @Springer International Publishing Swizerland 2014.
   Google Scholar
• J. Wang, and Y. Yang, “A context sensitive deep learning approach for micro calcification detection in mammograms,” Pattern Recognit., Vol. 78, pp. 12–22, 2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, Q. Qu, G. Yu, and Y. Kang, “Breast tumor detection in double views mammography based on extreme learning machine,” Neural Comput. & Applic., Vol. 27, pp. 227–240, 2016, Springer. doi: 10.1007/s00521-014-1764-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Shrivastava, and J. Bharti. “Empirical analysis of image segmentation techniques”, © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2016, SmartCom 2016, CCIS 628, pp. 143–50, 2016 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3433-6_18.
   Google Scholar
• N. Shrivastava, and J. Bharti, ““A comparative analysis of medical image segmentation”, International Conference on Advanced Computing Networking and Informatics,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., Vol. 870, pp. 459–67, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2673-8_48.
   Google Scholar
• V. P. Singh, A. Srivastava, D. Kulshreshtha, A. Choudhary, and R. Shrivastava, “Mammogram classification using selected GLCM feature and random forest classifier,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. (IJCSIS), Vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 82–87, June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• V. P. Singh, and R. Srivastava, “Content based mammogram retrieval using wavelet based complete – LBP and K-means clustering for the diagnosis of breast cancer,” Int. J. Hybrid. Intell. Syst., Vol. 14, pp. 31–39, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• V. P. Singh, S. Srivastava, and R. Shrivastava, “Automated and effective content-based image retrieval for digital mammography,” J. Xray. Sci. Technol., Vol. 26, pp. 29–49, 2018. doi:10.3233/XST-17306. IOS Press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. P. Singh, and R. Srivastava, “Automated and effective content based mammogram retrieval using wavelet based CS-LBP feature and self-organizing map,” Boicybern. Biomed. Eng., 2017. doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2017.09.03.
   Google Scholar
• V. P. Singh, S. Srivastava, and R. Srivastava, “Effective mammogram classification based on center symmetric-LBP features in wavelet domain using random forests,” Technol. Health Care, Vol. 25, pp. 709–27, 2017. doi:10.3233/THC-170851. IOS Press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Makandar, and B. Halalli, “Pre-processing of mammography image for early detection of breast cancer,” Int. J. Comput. Appl. (0975-8887), Vol. 144,, no. 3, pp. 11–15, June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• K. L. Kashyap, M. K. Bajpai, and P. Khanna, “An Efficient algorithm for mass detection and shape analysis of different masses present in digital mammograms,” Multimed. Tools Appl., Vol. 77, pp. 9249–69, Spring, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ramya, D. Murugan, and G. Muthulakshmi, “Implementation and comparison of the spatial denoising filter for impulse noise on MIAS dataset,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng., Vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 510–4, Sep 2018.
   Google Scholar
• M. P. Sukassini, and T. Velmurugan. “Noise removal using morphology and median filter methods in mammogram images,” The 3rd International Conference on Small & Medium Business 2016 January 19–21, 2016, Nikko Saigon Hotel, Hochiminh, Vietnam, pp. 413–519.
   Google Scholar
• K. L. Kashyap, K. K. Singh, M. K. Bajpai, and P. Khanna. “Fractional order filter based enhancement of digital mammograms,” Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2017 Vol I WCECS 2017, October 25–27, 2017, San Francisco, USA.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kannan, N. P. Subiramaniyam, A. T. Rajamanickam, and A. Balamurugan, “Performance comparison of noise reduction in mammogram images,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., Vol. 05, no. 2, pp. 31–33, Feb 2016.
   Google Scholar
• D. Surya Prabha, and J. Satheesh Kumar, “Performance evaluation of image segmentation using objective methods,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., Vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1–8, February 2016. ISSN: 0974-5645.
   Google Scholar
• Y. J. Zhang, “A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation,” Pattern Recognit., Vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1335–46, 1996. Elsevier Science Ltd.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Polak, H. Zhang, and M. Pi, “An evaluation metric for image segmentation of multiple objects,” Image. Vis. Comput., Vol. 27, pp. 1223–7, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Kalavathi, “An image spatial alignment method for computing region overlapping measures,” Int. J. Emerg. Trends Technol. Comput. Sci., Vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 251–5, September 2014. ISSN: 2278-6856.
   Google Scholar
• S. M. Aqil Burney, and H. Tariq, “K-Means Cluster analysis for image segmentation,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., Vol. 96, pp. 1–8, June 2014. ISSN: 0975-8887.
   Google Scholar
• A. Phophalia, S. K. Mitra, and C. Chawla, “A study on image segmentation using moments,” Asian J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., Vol. 2, pp. 89–93, 2012. ISSN: 2249-5126.
   Google Scholar
• M. Heath, K. Bowyer, D. Kopans, R. Moore, and W. P. Kegelmeyer. “The digital database for screening mammography,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 212–8, Toronto Canada June 2000.
   Google Scholar
• P. S. Vikhe, and V. R. Thool, “Mass detection in mammographic images using wavelet processing and adaptive threshold technique,” J. Med. Syst., Vol. 40, no. 4, p. 82, 2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. M. Basheer, and M. M. H. Mohammed, “Segmentation of breast masses in digital mammograms using adaptive median filtering and texture analysis,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• P. U. Hepsag, S. A. Ozel, and A. Yazici. “Using deep learning for mammography classification,” 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering, October 5–8, 2017, Antalya, Turkey, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• S. Dhahbi, W. Barhoumi, and E. Zagruoba, “Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments,” Comput. Biol. Med., Vol. 64, pp. 79–90, 2015 Sep 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gorge, A. Sertbas, N. Kilic, N. Osman, and O. Osman, “Mammographical mass detection and classification using wavelet based support vector machine,” Methods, Vol. 10, pp. 11, 2012 Feb 14.
   Google Scholar
• L. Liu, J. Li, and Y. Wang. “Breast mass detection with kernelized supervised hashing”, International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, pp. 79–84, Shenyang, China, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• M. Heath, K. Bowyer, D. Kopans, R. Moore, and W. Philip Kegelmeyer. “The Digital Database for Screening Mammography”, In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Toronto. Medical Physics Publishings, June 11–14, 2000, pp. 212–218.
   Google Scholar