A Modified Tunable – Q Wavelet Transform Approach for Tamil Speech Enhancement

References

• S. Muangjaroen, and T. Yingthawornsuk, “A Study of Noise Reduction in Speech Signal using FIR Filtering,” International Conference on Advances in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ICAEEE 2012), Pattaya, April 13–15 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• K. Kondo. Subjective quality measurement of speech: Its evaluation, estimation and applications. Springer, 2012. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10. 1007/978-3-642-27506-7_1
   Google Scholar
• J. Benesty, S. Makino, and J. Chen. Speech enhancement. Springer, 2005. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27489-8_1
   Google Scholar
• T. F. Sanam, and C. Shahnaz, “Enhancement of noisy speech based on a custom thresholding function with a statistically determined threshold,” Int J Speech Technology-Springer, Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 463–475, December 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10772-012-9144-6
   Google Scholar
• P. Krishnamoorthy, and S. R. M. Prasanna, “Temporal and spectral processing methods for processing of degraded speech: A review,” IETE Techn. Rev, Vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 137–148, 2009. doi: 10.4103/0256-4602.49103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. C. Loizou. Speech enhancement: Theory and practice. First ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• S. Boll, “Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process, Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 1979. doi: 10.1109/TASSP.1979.1163209
   Google Scholar
• D. Kamath, and P. C. Loizou, “A multi-band spectral subtraction method for enhancing speech corrupted by colored noise,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (2002).
   Google Scholar
• P. Lockwood, and J. Boudy, “Experiments with a nonlinear spectral subtractor, Hidden Markov models and the projection for robust speech recognition in cars,” Speech. Commun., Vol. 11, no. 2–3, pp. 215–228, 1992. doi: 10.1016/0167-6393(92)90016-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. C. You, C. Mao, J. S. Wang, and F. C. Chuang, “A recursive parametric spectral subtraction algorithm for speech enhancement,” Proceedings of Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications: With Aspects of Contemporary Intelligent Computing Techniques, Third International Conference on Intelligent Computing, ICIC, Qingdao, China, 21–24, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• J. R. Deller, J. H. L. Hansen, and J. G. Proakis. Discrete-time processing of speech signals. Second ed. New york: IEEE Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• M. Berouti, R. Schwartz, and J. Makhoul, “Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic noise,” Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Acoust. Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP), Washington DC, 208–211, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Ghanbari, M. Karami, and B. Amelifard, “Improved multiband spectral subtraction method for speech enhancement,” Proc. 6th IASTED Internat. Conf. on Signal Image Process. USA, 225–230, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Ghanbari, and M. Karami, “Spectral subtraction in the wavelet domain for speech enhancement,” Internat. J. Software Inf. Technol. (IJSIT), Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–30, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• H. Sameti, H. Sheikhzadeh, and R. L. Deng Li Brennan, “HMM-based strategies for enhancement of speech signals embedded in non stationary noise,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process, Vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 445–455, 1998. doi: 10.1109/89.709670
   Google Scholar
• M. Klein, and P. Kabal, “Signal subspace speech enhancement with perceptual post-filtering:,” Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP), Vol. 1, pp. 537–540, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• D. L. Donoho, “De-noising by soft-thresholdin,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 613–627, 1995. doi: 10.1109/18.382009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Sheikhzadeh, and H. R. Abutalebi, “An improved wavelet based speech enhancement system,” Proc. 7th Eur. Conf. Speech Comm. Technol. (EuroSpeech), Aalborg, Denmark (Sep. 2001).
   Google Scholar
• J. Seok, and K. Bae, “Speech enhancement with reduction of noise components in the wavelet domain,” Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP), Vol. 2, pp. 1323–1326, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Q. Fu, and E. A. Wan, “Perceptual wavelet adaptive denoising of speech,” Presented at the Eurospeech, Geneva (2003).
   Google Scholar
• M. T. Johnson, X. Yuan, and Y. Ren, “Speech signal enhancement through adaptive wavelet thresholding,” Speech. Commun., Vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 123–133, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Tasmaz, and E. Ercelebi, “Speech enhancement based on undecimated wavelet packet-perceptual filterbanks and MMSE-STSA estimation in various noise environments,” Digit. Signal Process, Vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 797–812, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. H. Chang, S. Gazor, N. S. Kim, and S. K. Mitra, “Multiple statistical models for soft decision in noisy speech enhancement,” Pattern Recogn., Vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1123–1134, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2006.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Chen, and P. C. Loizou, “A Laplacian-based MMSE estimator for speech enhancement,” Speech. Commun., Vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 134–143, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2006.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Gerkmann, and M. Krawczyk, “MMSE-optimal spectral amplitude estimation given the STFT-phase,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett, Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 129–132, 2013. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2012.2233470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Jancovic, X. Zou, and M. Kokuer, “Speech enhancement based on sparse code shrinkage employing multiple speech models,” Speech. Commun., Vol. 54, pp. 108–118, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2011.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Y. Soon, S. N. Koh, and C. K. Yeo, “Noisy speech enhancement using discrete cosine transform,” Speech. Commun., Vol. 24, pp. 249–257, 1998. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00019-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Yegnanarayana, S. R. M. Prasanna, and K. S. Rao, “Speech enhancement using excitation source information,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP-2002), Orlando, USA (2002).
   Google Scholar
• C. Lin, L. Zengli, W. Wei, and T. Hui, “De-noising Algorithm of Modified thresholding Function Based on the Best basis of Wavelet packet,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (ICCSEE 2013).
   Google Scholar
• I. W. Selesnick, “Wavelet transform with tunable Q-factor,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., Vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 3560–3575, August 2011. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2011.2143711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Bayram, and I. W. Selesnick, “Frequency-domain design of overcomplete rational-dilation wavelet transforms,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process, Vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2957–2972, August 2009. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2009.2020756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daubechies, “Ten lectures on wavelets,” in CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), 1992. Available: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970104
   Google Scholar
• S. Patidar, and R. B. Pachori, “Classification of cardiac sound signals using constrained tunable-Q wavelet transform,” Elsevier - Expert Systems With Applications, Vol. 41, pp. 7161–7170, November 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Prahallad, E. Naresh Kumar, V. Keri, S. Rajendran, and A. W. Black, “The IIIT-H Indic Speech Databases,” in Proceedings of Interspeech, Portland (2012). OR. Available: http://speech.iiit.ac.in/index.php/research-svl/69.html.
   Google Scholar
• Columbia University, Newyork, Sound Examples. OR. Available https://www.ee.columbia.edu/~dpwe/sounds/
   Google Scholar
• J. Indra, and N. Kasthuri, “Development of noisy corpus database for classical tamil language,” International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 23039–23048, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• S. S. Chen. “Basis Pursuit,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1995; see also http://www-stat.stanford.edu/˜atomizer/.
   Google Scholar
• S. Chen, D. L. Donoho, and M. A. Saunders, “Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput, Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 33–61, 1998. doi: 10.1137/S1064827596304010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Selesnick. “TQWT Guide”, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• V. Turbin, and N. Faucheur. “Estimation of speech quality of noise reduced signals”, in Proceedings of Online workshop meas. speech audio quality network, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• A. Goudarzi, and M. A. Riahi, “TQWT and WDGA: innovative methods for ground roll attenuation,” J. Geophys. Eng., Vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 065007, 2013. doi: 10.1088/1742-2132/10/6/065007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITU-T. P.835. Series P: Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks: methods for objective and subjective assessment of quality, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• D. Gradolewski, G. Magenes, S. Johansson, and W. J. Kulesza, “A wavelet transform-based neural network denoising algorithm for mobile phonocardiography,” Sensors (Basel), Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 957–975, 2019. doi: 10.3390/s19040957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Garg, and O. P. Sahu, “A hybrid approach for speech enhancement using Bionic wavelet transform and Butterworth filter,” Int. J. Comput. Appl. (2019). doi:10.1080/1206212X.2019.1614293.
   Google Scholar