Optimization of Bio-Impedance Techniques-Based Monitoring System for Medical & Industrial Applications

References

• D. S. Holder, “Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) of brain function,” Brain Topogr., Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 87–93, 1992. doi: 10.1007/BF01129035
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R. Kumar, S. Kumar, and A. Sengupta, “A review : electrical impedance tomography system and Its application,” J. Contr. Instrum., Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 14–22, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• K. Y. Aristovich, B. C. Packham, H. Koo, G. S. Dos Santos, A. McEvoy, and D. S. Holder, “Imaging fast electrical activity in the brain with electrical impedance tomography,” Neuroimage, Vol. 124, pp. 204–13, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Saeedizadeh, S. Kermani, and H. Rabbani, “A comparison between the hp-version of finite element method with EIDORS for electrical impedance tomography,” J. Med. Signals. Sens., Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–4, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• L. Lu, L. Liu, and C. Hu. “Analysis of the electrical impedance tomography algorithm based on finite element method and Tikhonov,” in Int. Conf. Wavelet Anal. Pattern Recognit., 2014, pp. 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Ma, S. A. Miedema, V. Matousek, and W. J. Vlasblom. “Tomography as a measurement method for density and velocity,” in WDA 23 Tech. conference chicango, Illinois, no. June 2003, pp. 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• E. K. Murphy, A. Mahara, and R. J. Halter, “Absolute reconstructions using rotational electrical impedance tomography for breast cancer imaging,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Vol. 0062, pp. 1–1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• R. K. Meena, S. K. Pahuja, A. Bin Queyam, and A. Sengupta. “Electrical impedance tomography: a real time medical imaging technique,” in Handbook of Research on Advanced Concepts in Real-Time Image and Video Processing, IGI, 2018, pp. 130–52.
   Google Scholar
• S. M. Kim, T. I. Oh, E. J. Woo, S. W. Kim, and J. K. Seo. “Time- and frequency-difference imaging using KHU Mark1 EIT system,” in 13th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance and the 8th Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography: ICEBI 2007, August 29th - September 2nd 2007, Graz, Austria, H. Scharfetter and R. Merwa, Eds. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 340–3.
   Google Scholar
• V. Chitturi, and N. Farrukh. “A low cost electrical impedance tomography (EIT) for pulmonary disease modelling and diagnosis,” in Name Second Int. Conf. Technol. Adv. Electr. Electron. Comput. Eng., 2014, pp. 83–9.
   Google Scholar
• M. Goharian, M. Soleimani, A. Jegatheesan, K. Chin, and G. R. Moran, “A DSP based multi-frequency 3D electrical impedance tomography system,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1594–603, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s10439-008-9537-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Soleimani, “Electrical impedance tomography system: an open access circuit design,” Biomed. Eng. Online, Vol. 5, pp. 28, 2006. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-5-28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Khalighi, B. Vosoughi Vahdat, M. Mortazavi, W. Hy, and M. Soleimani. “Practical design of low-cost instrumentation for industrial electrical impedance tomography (EIT),” in 2012 IEEE I2MTC - Int. Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf. Proc., 2012, pp. 1259–63.
   Google Scholar
• G. Xu, R. Wang, S. Zhang, S. Yang, G. A. Justin, M. Sun, and W. Yan. “A 128-electrode three dimensional electrical impedance tomography system,”in Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. – Proc., 2007, pp. 4386–9.
   Google Scholar
• T. K. Bera, and J. Nagaraju, “A chicken tissue phantom for studying an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system suitable for clinical imaging,” Sens. Imaging, Vol. 12, no. 3–4, pp. 95–116, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s11220-011-0063-4
   Google Scholar
• T. K. Bera, and J. Nagaraju. “A multifrequency Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) system for biomedical imaging,” in 2012 Int. Conf. Signal Process. Commun. SPCOM, 2012, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• H. Wi, H. Sohal, A. L. McEwan, E. J. Woo, and T. I. Oh, “Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography system with automatic self-calibration for long-term monitoring,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 119–28, 2014. doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2013.2256785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. K. Bera, and N. Jampana. “A multifrequency constant current source suitable for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT),” in Int. Conf. Syst. Med. Biol. ICSMB 2010 – Proc., no. December 2010, pp. 278–83.
   Google Scholar
• C. Huang, F. Yu, P. Shih, and H. Chung, “Noise reduction of electrical impedance tomography via movable electrodes,” Instrum. Sci. Technol., Vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 543–50, 2007. doi: 10.1080/10739140701540339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Dong, C. Xu, Z. Zhang, and S. Ren, “Design of parallel electrical resistance tomography system for measuring multiphase flow,” Chin. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 368–79, 2012. doi: 10.1016/S1004-9541(12)60400-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. K. Bera, and J. Nagaraju, “Surface electrode switching of a 16-electrode wireless EIT system using RF-based digital data transmission scheme with 8 channel encoder/decoder ICs,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., Vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 541–55, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hanke, B. Harrach, and N. Hyvönen, “Justification of point electrode models in electrical impedance tomography,” Math. Model. Methods Appl. Sci., Vol. 21, no. 06, pp. 1395–413, 2011. doi: 10.1142/S0218202511005362
   Google Scholar
• C. L. Yang. “Electrical impedance tomography: algorithms and applications,” thesis, Univ. Bath, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• M. Gehre, and B. Jin, “Expectation propagation for nonlinear inverse problems - with an application to electrical impedance tomography,” J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 259, pp. 513–35, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. M. Graham. “Enhancements in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) image reconstruction for 3D lung imaging,” no. April 2007, p. 148.
   Google Scholar
• B. Kilic, and K. O. R. K. Mehmet, “A finite element method based neural network technique for image reconstruction in electrical impedance imaging,” Int. Biomed. Eng. Days, Vol. II, pp. 100–2, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• R. Keshwani, “Analysis of magnetic flux leakage signals of instrumented pipeline inspection gauge using finite element method,” IETE J. Res., Vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 73, 2009. doi: 10.4103/0377-2063.53238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. He, B. Li, Z. Xu, H. Luo, and P. Ran, “A combined regularization algorithm for electrical impedance tomography system using rectangular,” Biomed. Eng. Appl. Basis Commun., Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 313–22, 2012. doi: 10.4015/S1016237212500263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Qiu, B. S. Hoyle, and F. J. W. Podd, “Engineering and application of a dual-modality process tomography system,” Flow Meas. Instrum., Vol. 18, pp. 247–54, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2007.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Sarode, H. Patil, and A. N. Cheeran, “LabVIEW based automatic data acquisition system for electrical impedance tomography,” Int. J. Comp. Sci. Inf. Technol., Vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4320–4, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• J. Wu, X. Chen, and Z. Ding, “Digital biomedical electrical impedance tomography based on FPGA,” J. Biosci. Med., Vol. 1, pp. 14–18, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• S. Anand, B. Lall, A. Srivastava, and V. Singh. “Development of a microcontroller based electrical impedance tomography system,” pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• D. O. N. G. Feng, X. U. Cong, Z. H. A. N. G. Z, and R. E. N. Shangjie, “Design of parallel electrical resistance tomography system for measuring multiphase flow,” Chin. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 368–79, 2012. doi: 10.1016/S1004-9541(12)60383-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Sun, S. Tsuda, K.-P. Zauner, and H. Morgan, “On-chip electrical impedance tomography for imaging biological cells,” Biosens. Bioelectron., Vol. 25, pp. 1109–15, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.09.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kourunen, T. Savolainen, A. Lehikoinen, M. Vauhkonen, and L. M. Heikkinen, “Suitability of a PXI platform for an electrical impedance tomography system,” Meas. Sci. Technol., Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 015503, 2009. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/20/1/015503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar