An Efficient Approach to Schedule Generating Units of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Generating System

References

• F. Salgado, and P. Pedrero, “Short-term operational planning on cogeneration systems: A survey,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., Vol. 78, pp. 835–48, May 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Kerr, “Evaluating the benefits of greater global investment in combined heat and power,” Int. Energy Agency, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• T. Kerr, “The international CHP/DHC collaborative advancing near-term low carbon technologies,” Int. Energy Agency, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• EPA United states environment protection agency (2017, July 29). Available: https://www.epa.gov/chp.
   Google Scholar
• Pacific Northwest National Laboratory U.S. department of energy (2017, July 29). Available: http://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highligh.asp/id=546.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Energy Agency. Technology Data for Energy Plants. Generation of Electricity and District Heating, Energy Storage and Energy Carrier Generation and Conversion, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• C. Liu, M. Shahidehpour, Z. Li, and M. F. Firuzabad, “Component and mode models for the short-term scheduling of combined cycle units,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 976–90, May 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Dvorak, and P. Havel, “Combined heat and power production planning under liberalized market conditions,” Appl. Therm. Eng., Vol. 43, pp. 163–173, Oct. 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Lu, and M. Shahidehpour, “Short-term scheduling of combined cycle units,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1616–25, Aug. 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Veerapenand, and M. Beerepoot. Co-generation and renewable/solutions for a low-carbon energy future. Paris: Tech. rep., International Energy Agency, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• V. S. Pappala, and I. Erlich, “Consideration of wind power and demand uncertainties in unit commitment problem using PSO,” IFAC Proceedings of the 17th World Congress, Vol. 41, pp. 14963–14968, July 6–11, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• X. Chen, C. Kang, M. O. Malley, Q. Xia, J. Bai, C. Liu, R. Sun, W. Wang, and H. Li, “Increasing the flexibility of combined heat and power for wind power integration in China: modelling and implications,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1848–57, July 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. Javadi, M. Lotfi, M. Gough, and J. P. S. Catalão, “Optimal sizing and siting of electrical energy storage devices for smart grids considering time-of-use programs,” in IECON 2019 - 45th Annu. Conf. IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc, 2019, pp. 4017–22.
   Google Scholar
• F. J. Rooijers, and A. M. Robert, “Static economic dispatch for co-generation systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1392–8, Aug. 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Guo, I. H. Mark, and M. V. Ooijen, “An algorithm for combined heat and power economic dispatch,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1778–84, Nov. 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Basu, “Combined heat and power economic dispatch by using differential evolution,” Electr. Power Compon. Syst., Vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 996–1004, Dec. 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. L. Gaing, “Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic dispatch considering the generator constraints,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1187–95, Aug. 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. Javadi, A. Esmaeel Nezhad, and S. Sabramooz, “Economic heat and power dispatch in modern power system harmony search algorithm versus analytical solution,” Science Iran, Vol. 19, pp. 1820–8, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Narang, E. Sharma, and J. S. Dhillon, “Combined heat and power economic dispatch using integrated civilized swarm optimization and Powell’s pattern search method,” Appl. Soft. Comput., Vol. 52, pp. 190–202, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Anand, and N. Narang, “Civilized swarm optimization for combined heat and power economic emission dispatch,” in IEEE Seventh India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE 2016), Patiala, Nov. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Y. W. Jeong, J. B. Park, J. R. Shin, and K. Y. Lee, “A thermal unit commitment approach using an improved quantum evolutionary algorithm,” Electr. Power Compon. Syst., Vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 770–86, June 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Monteiro, N. A. Moreira, and S. Ferreira, “Planning of micro-combined heat and power systems in the Portuguese scenario,” Appl. Energy, Vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 290–8, March 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zugno, J. M. Morales, and H. Madsen, “Commitment and dispatch of heat and power via affinely adjustable robust optimization,” Comput. Oper. Res., Vol. 75, no. c, pp. 191–201, July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• A. Rong, H. Hakonen, and R. Lahdelma, “A dynamic regrouping based sequential dynamic programming algorithm for unit commitment of combined heat and power systems,” Energy Convers. Manage., Vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1108–15, April 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rong, and B. Peter, “A dynamic regrouping based dynamic programming approach for unit commitment of the transmission-constrained multi-site combined heat and power system,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2017. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2699484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Li, W. Wu, J. Wang, B. Zhang, and T. Zheng, “Transmission-constrained unit commitment considering combined electricity and district heating networks,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. C1–450, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. E. Razavi, M. S. Javadi, and A. Esmaeel Nezhad, “Mixed-integer nonlinear programming framework for combined heat and power units with nonconvex feasible operating region: feasibility, optimality, and flexibility evaluation,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., Vol. 29, pp. 1–18, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. E. Nezhad, F. Ghanavati, and A. Ahmarinejad, “Determining the optimal operating point of CHP units with nonconvex characteristics in the context of combined heat and power scheduling problem,” IETE. J. Res., pp. 1–14, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kia, M. S. Nazar, M. S. Sepdegh, A. Heidari, and P. Siano, “Optimal day ahead scheduling of combined heat and power units with electrical and thermal storage considering security constraint of power systems,” Energy, Vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 241–52, Feb. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• M. S. Javadi, S. Sabramooz, and A. Javadinasab, “Security constrained generation scheduling using harmony search optimization case study: Day-ahead heat and power scheduling,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., Vol. 5, pp. 1–9, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• A. Rong, and R. Lahdelma, “An efficient model and algorithm for the transmission-constrained multi-site combined heat and power system,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., Vol. 258, no. 3, pp. 1106–17, May 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Y. Yamin, Q. E. Dwairi, and S. M. Shahidehpour, “A new approach for GENCOs profit based unit commitment in day-ahead competitive electricity markets considering reserve uncertainty,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., Vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 609–16, Oct. 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. V. V. Sudhakar, C. Karri, and A. J. Laxmi, “Profit based unit commitment for GENCOs using Lagrange relaxation-differential evolution,” Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 738–47, April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• M. E. Nazari, and M. M. Ardehali, “Profit-based unit commitment of integrated CHP-thermal-heat only units in energy and spinning reserve markets with considerations for environmental CO2 emission cost and valve-point effects,” Energy, Vol. 133, no. 15, pp. 621–35, Aug. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• C. A. Georgopoulou, and K. C. Giannakoglou, “Two-level, two-objective evolutionary algorithms for solving unit commitment problems,” Appl. Energy, Vol. 86, no. 7-8, pp. 1229–39, July–Aug. 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Aghaei, V. G. Agelidis, M. Charwand, F. Raeisi, A. Ahmadi, A. E. Nezhad, and A. Heidari, “Optimal robust unit commitment of CHP plants in electricity markets using information gap decision theory,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, no. 99, pp. 1–9, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• H. Anand, N. Narang, and J. S. Dhillon, “Profit based unit commitment using hybrid optimization technique,” Energy, Vol. 148, pp. 701–15, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Anand, N. Narang, and J. S. Dhillon, “Unit commitment considering dual-mode combined heat and power generating units using integrated optimization technique,” Energy Convers. Manage., Vol. 171, pp. 984–1001, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhao, C. X. Guo, B. R. Bai, and Y. J. Cao, “An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for unit commitment,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., Vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 482–90, Sept. 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mori, and K. Okawa, “Meta-heuristic a new method for profit-based unit commitment under competitive environment,” in IEEE Bucharest Power Technology Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 28th–July 2nd, pp. 1–6, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• M. Clerc, and J. Kennedy, “The particle swarm-explosion, stability and convergence in a multidimensional complex space,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–73, Feb. 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Senjyu, K. Shimabukuro, K. Uezato, and T. Funabashi, “A fast technique for unit commitment problem by extended priority list,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 882–8, Nov. 2003.
   Google Scholar