Predicting Breast Density of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis from 2D Mammograms

References

• H.-P. Chan, J. Wei, B. Sahiner, E. A. Rafferty, T. Wu, and M. A. Roubidoux, “Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience,” Radiology, Vol. 237, no. 3, pp. 1075–1080, Dec. 2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. Park, E. A. Franken, M. Garg, L. L. Fajardo, and L. T. Niklason, “Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications,” Radiographics, Vol. 27, pp. 231–240, Oct. 2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Smith. “Fundamentals of breast tomosynthesis: improving the performance of mammography,” Available: http://hologic.ca/sites/default/files/Fundamentals%20of%20Breast%20Tomosynthesis_WP-00007.pdf, Oct. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• T. S. Subashini, V. Ramalingam, and S. Palanivel, “Automated assessment of breast tissue density in digital mammograms,” Comput. Vis. Image Und, Vol. 114, pp. 33–43, Jan. 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Yeh, S. Chan, and T. Wu. “Breast density prediction: from 2D Mammograms to digital breast tomosynthesis,” in Proc. 2016 Int. Conf. Innovation and Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Jul. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• J. W. Byngt, N. F. Boyd, E. Fishell, R. A. Jong, and M. J. Yaffe, “The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities,” Phys. Med. Biol, Vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1629–1638, Oct. 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Oliver, J. Freixenet, R. Mart´ı, J. Pont, E. P´erez, E. E. Denton, and R. Zwiggelaar, “A novel breast tissue density classification methodology,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55–65, Jan. 2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Vállez, G. Bueno, O. Déniz, J. Dorado, J. A. Seoane, A. Pazos, and C. Pastor, “Breast density classification to reduce false positives in CADe systems,” Comput. Methods Programs in Biomed, Vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 569–584, Feb. 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Quintana, M. Redondo, and G. Tirao, “Implementation of several mathematical algorithms to breast tissue density classification,” Radiat. Phys. Chem, Vol. 95, pp. 261–263, Feb. 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Llobet, M. Pollán, J. Antón, J. Miranda-García, M. Casals, and I. Martínez, “Semi-automated and fully automated mammographic density measurement and breast cancer risk prediction,” Comput. Methods Programs in Biomed, Vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 105–115, Sep. 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Sharma, “Comparative analysis of region of interest of different sizes for breast density classification,” Int. J. Med. Res. Health Sci., Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 76–84, Mar. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rampun, P. J. Morrow, B. W. Scotney, and H. Wang, “Breast density classification in mammograms: an investigation of encoding techniques in binary-based local patterns,” Comput. Bio. Med, Vol. 122, pp. 103842, Jul. 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. Bakic, A. Carton, D. Kontos, C. Zhang, A. Troxel, and A. A. Maidment, “Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections,” Radiology, Vol. 252, no. 1, pp. 40–49, Jul. 2009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tagliafico, G. Tagliafico, D. Astengo, F. Cavagnetto, R. Rosasco, and G. Rescinito, “Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software,” Eur. Radiol, Vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1265–1270, Feb. 2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tagliafico, G. Tagliafico, D. Astengo, S. Airaldi, M. Calabrese, and N. Houssami, “Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat., Vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 311–317, Feb. 2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. Mazurowski, J. Y. Lo, B. P. Harrawood, and G. D. Tourassi, “Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: from mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis,” J. Biomed. Inform, Vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 815–823, Oct. 2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. U. Ekpo, C. Mello-Thoms, M. Rickard, P. C. Brennan, and M. F. McEntee, “Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): agreement between quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS®,” Breast, Vol. 30, pp. 185–190, Dec. 2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Moshina, H. S. Aase, A. S. Danielsen, I. S. Haldorsen, C. I. Lee, S. Zackrisson, and S. Hofvind, “Comparing screening outcomes for digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography by automated breast density in a randomized controlled trial: results from the To-Be trial,” Radiology, Vol. 297, no. 3, pp. 522–531, Dec. 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Yeh, S. Chan, and T. Wu, “Mining breast cancer classification rules from mammograms,” J. Intell. Syst, Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 19–36, Jan. 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. C. Gonzalez, and R. E. Woods. Digital image processing. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002. Ch. 11.
   Google Scholar
• R. Haralick, M. K. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein, “Texture features for image classification,” IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cyb, Vol. SMC-3, no. 6, pp. 610–621, Nov. 1973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. D. Cheng, X. J. Shi, R. Min, L. M. Hu, X. P. Cai, and H. N. Du, “Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms,” Pattern Recogn., Vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 646–668, Apr. 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and D. Harwood, “A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on feature distributions,” Pattern Recogn., Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 51–59, Jan. 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.-C. He, and L. Wang, “Texture features based on texture spectrum,” Pattern Recogn., Vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 391–399, May. 1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Lladó, A. Oliver, J. Freixenet, R. Martí, and J. Martí, “A textural approach for mass false positive reduction in mammography,” Comput. Med. Imaging Graph, Vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 415–422, Sep. 2009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Joseph, and K. Balakrishnan, “Local binary patterns, Haar wavelet features and Haralick texture features for mammogram image classification using artificial neural networks,” Comm. Com. Inf. Sc, Vol. 198, pp. 107–114, Jan. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• M. Nguyen and I. Altintas. Decision trees. Coursera. Available: https://www.coursera.org/lecture/big-data-machine-learning/decision-trees-XewvA?, Jan. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• V. Vapnik. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• E. D. Ubeyli, “Comparison of different classification algorithms in clinical decision-making,” Expert Syst., Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 17–31, Feb. 2007. Ch. 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Li, S. Zhu, and M. Ogihara, “Using discriminant analysis for multi-class classification: an experimental investigation,” Knowl. Inf. Syst, Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 453–472, Mar. 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar