New Method to Detect Loss of Excitation in Synchronous Generators

REFERENCES

• D. Reimert. Protective relaying for power generation systems, 3rd ed. New York, USA: Taylor & Francis, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• C. R. Mason, “A new loss-of-excitation relay for synchronous generators,” Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng., Vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 1240–5, 1949. doi:10.1109/T-AIEE.1949.5060079
   Google Scholar
• H. Yaghobi, “Fast discrimination of stable power swing from generator loss of excitation,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1682–90, 2016. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1045
   Google Scholar
• R. L. Tremaine, and J. L. Blackburn, “Loss of field protection for synchronous machines,” Electr. Eng., Vol. 73, no. 11, p. 1008, 1954. doi:10.1109/EE.1954.6439083
   Google Scholar
• J. Berdy, “Loss of excitation protection for modern synchronous generators,” IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., Vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1457–63, 1975. doi:10.1109/T-PAS.1975.31987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. P. Shi, J. P. Wang, Z. Gajic, C. Sao and M. Ghandhari, “The comparison and analysis for loss of excitation protection schemes in generator protection,” 11th IET International Conference on Developments in Power Systems Protection (DPSP 2012), pp. 1–6, 2012. doi:10.1049/cp.2012.0071
   Google Scholar
• W. D. Breingan, C. H. Castro, J. R. Latham, J. Mescua, A. G. Phadke, J. M. Postforoosh, E. O. Schweitzer, W. M. Strang, F. Y. Tajaddodi, and E. A. Udren, “Survey of experience with generator protection and prospects for improvements using digital computers,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1511–22, 1988. doi:10.1109/61.193950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. P. Subcommittee, “Loss of field operation during system disturbances,” IEEE Trans. Power Appl. Syst., Vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1464–72, 1975. doi:10.1109/T-PAS.1975.31988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. D. Rana, R. P. Schulz, M. Heyeck, and T. R. Boyer, “Generator loss of field study for AEP's Rockport plant,” IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 44–49, 1990. doi:10.1109/67.53230
   Google Scholar
• B. Mahamedi, J. G. Zhu, and S. M. Hashemi, “A setting-free approach to detecting loss of excitation in synchronous generators,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 2270–8, 2016. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2015.2504539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Amraee, “Loss-of-field detection in synchronous generators using decision tree technique,” IET. Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 943–54, 2013. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Amini, M. Davarpanah, and M. Sanaye-Pasand, “A novel approach to detect the synchronous generator loss of excitation,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1429–38, 2015. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2370763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hasani, and F. Haghjoo, “A secure and setting-free technique to detect loss of field in synchronous generators,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1512–22, 2017. doi:10.1109/TEC.2017.2697501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, W. Hu, F. Xu, M. Li, D. Li and X. Li, “Study on a New Loss-of-Field Protection Strategy, 2012 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, pp. 1–6, 2012. doi: 10.1109/APPEEC.2012.6307681
   Google Scholar
• Ö Usta, M. H. Musa, M. Bayrak, and M. A. Redfern, “A new relaying algorithm to detect loss of excitation of synchronous generators,” Turkish J Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 339–49, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• M. N. Azari, “A setting-free flux-based synchronous generator loss of excitation protection,” Electr. Eng., Vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 2329–39, 2018. doi:10.1007/s00202-018-0712-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. R. S. Pierre, “Loss-of-excitation protection for synchronous generators on isolated systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. IA-21, pp. 81–98, 1985. doi:10.1109/TIA.1985.349646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. L. Coelho, C. E. Carrer, C. A. Guerrero, and P. M. Silveira, “Loss-of-excitation protection and underexcitation controls correlation for synchronous generators in a real-time digital simulator,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 3579–90, 2015. doi:10.1109/TIA.2015.2424884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. H. Lee, L. S. Ma, C. H. Weng, and B. K. Chen, “Lessons learned from the generator loss of field at a cogeneration thermal power plant in Taiwan,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2093–2100, 2011. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2105894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ghorbani, S. Soleymani, and B. Mozafari, “A PMU-based LOE protection of synchronous generator in the presence of GIPFC,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 551–8, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Yaghobi, H. Mortazavi, K. Ansari, H. Rajabi Mashhadi, H. Khorashadizadeh, and H. Borzoe, “Study on application of flux linkage of synchronous generator for loss of excitation detection,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., Vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 802–17, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Fan, X. Li, P. Xue, and J. Liu, “The research UL-P of loss-of-excitation protection for generator based on the artificial neural networks,” in 2009 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, 2009, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• PC. Krause, “Analysis of electric machinery”, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 211–30, 2002.
   Google Scholar