Oblique and Polarization Independent Metasurface-Based Absorber for Bio-Sensing Applications

References

• H. L. Zhang, B. J. Hu, and X. Y. Zhang, “Compact equal and unequal dual-frequency power dividers based on composite right-/left-handed transmission lines,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 3464–72, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. A. Gordon, J. O’ Hara, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., Vol. 54, no. 2 pp. 10–35, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. B. Glybovski, S. A. Tretyakov, P. A. Belov, Y. S. Kivshar, and C. R. Simovski, “Metasurfaces: From microwaves to visible,” Phys. Rep., Vol. 634, no.15, pp. 1–72, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• H. Chen, A. J. Taylor, and N. Yu, “A review of metasurfaces: Physics and applications,” Rep. Prog. Phys., Vol. 79, no. 7, p. 076401, 2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Achouri, M. A. Salem, and C. Caloz, “General metasurface synthesis based on susceptibility tensors,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 2977–91, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Wei, J. Huang, J. Li, G. Xu, and Z. Ju, “Dual-broadband and near-perfect polarization converter based on anisotropic metasurface,” Opt. Quantum Electron., Vol. 49, no. 9, p. 298, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Alaee, M. Albooyeh, and C. Rockstuhl, “Theory of metasurface based perfect absorbers,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., Vol. 50, no. 50, p. 503002, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Bhattacharyya and P. Chakrabarti, “Frequency-and time-domain analyses of multiple reflections and interference phenomena in a metamaterial absorber,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, Vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 586–592, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. I. Landy, S. Sajuyigbe, J. J. Mock, D. Smith, and W. Padilla, “Perfect metamaterial absorber,” Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 100, p. 207402, 2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Abdalla, “Experimental verification of a triple band thin radar absorber metamaterial for oblique incidence applications,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett., Vol. 39, pp. 63–72, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kalraiya, R. K. Chaudhary, M. A. Abdalla, and R. K. Gangwar, “Polarization independent dual-band conformal metamaterial absorber for X-band microwave application,” Electron. Lett., Vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 546–8, May 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Lee, J. G. Hwang, D. Lim, T. Hara, and S. Lim, “Incident angle- and polarization-insensitive metamaterial absorber using circular sectors,” Sci. Rep., Vol. 6, p. 27155, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kalraiya, R. K. Chaudhary, and M. A. Abdalla, “Design and analysis of polarization independent conformal wideband metamaterial absorber using resistor loaded sector shaped resonators,” J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 125, no. 13, p. 125, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Chaurasiya, S. Ghosh, S. Bhattacharyya, A. Bhattacharya, and K. V. Srivastava, “Compact multi-band polarisation-insensitive metamaterial absorber,” IET Microwav. Antennas Propag., Vol. 10, no. 1, pp 94–101, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Mishra, D. K. Choudhary, and K. Kumari, “An investigation on compact ultra-thin triple band polarization independent metamaterial absorber for microwave frequency applications,” IEEE Access., Vol. 5, pp. 4370– 3192, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kalraiya, R. Chaudhary; R. Gangwar, and M. Abdalla, “Compact quad-band polarization independent metasurface absorber using circular/square metallic ring resonator,” Mater. Res. Express, Vol. 6, p. 055812, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zhai, C. Zhan, Z. Li, and C. Liang, “A triple-band ultrathin metamaterial absorber with wide-angle and polarization stability,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., Vol. 14, pp. 241–4, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sarkhel and S. R. B. Chaudhuri, “Compact quad-band polarization-insensitive ultrathin metamaterial absorber with wide angle stability,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., Vol. 16, pp. 3240–4, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• A. K. Singh, M. P. Abegaonkar, and S. K. Koul, “Dual-and triple-band polarization insensitive ultrathin conformal metamaterial absorbers with wide angular stability,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 878–6, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li and J. Sun, “Umbrella-shaped graphene/Si for multi-band tunable terahertz absorber,” Appl. Phys. B, Vol. 125, no. 9, p. 183, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Hui, H. Yuan, B. Zhou, X. P. Shen, Q. Cheng, and T. J. Cui, “Ultrathin multiband gigahertz metamaterial absorbers,” J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 110, p. 014909, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Bendelala, A. Cheknane, and H. S. Hilal, “A broad-band polarization-insensitive absorber with a wide-angle range metamaterial for thermo-photovoltaic conversion,” Opt. Quantum Electron., Vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Xie, W. Gao, J. Shu, Y. Ying, and J. Kono, “Extraordinary sensitivity enhancement by metasurfaces in terahertz detection of antibiotics,” Sci. Rep., Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sheeny, A.Wallace, and S. Wang. “300 GHz radar object recognition based on deep neural networks and transfer learning,” IET Radar Sonar Navig., Vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1483–1493, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Munaga, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Ghosh, and K. V. Srivastava, “An ultra-thin compact polarization-independent hexa-band metamaterial absorber,” Appl. Phys. A, Vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Ghosh, D. Chaurasiya, and K. V. Srivastava, “An ultrathin penta-band polarization-insensitive compact metamaterial absorber for airborne radar applications,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 2519–2524, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Zamzam, P. Rezaei, and S. A. Khatami, “Quad-band polarization-insensitive metamaterial perfect absorber based on bilayer graphene metasurface,” Phys. E, Vol. 128, pp. 114621, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• N. T. Q. Hoa, P. H. Lam, P. D. Tung, T. S. Tuan, and H. Nguyen, “Numerical study of a wide-angle and polarization-insensitive ultrabroadband metamaterial absorber in visible and near-infrared region,” IEEE Photonics J., Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Lee, S. Kim, H. Park, and B. Lee, “Metamaterials and metasurfaces for sensor applications,” Sensors, 17, no. 8, p. 1726, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• C. Liaskos, S. Nie, A. Tsioliaridou, A. Pitsillides, S. Ioannidis, and I. Akyildiz, “A new wireless communication paradigm through software-controlled metasurfaces,” IEEE Commun. Mag., Vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 162–9, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Yang, J. Gu, D. Wang, X. Zhang, Z. Tian, C. Ouyang, R. Singh, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Efficient flat metasurface lens for terahertz imaging,” Opt. Express, Vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 25931–9, 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Farmani, A. Mir, M. Bazgir, and F. B. Zarrabi, “Highly sensitive nano-scale plasmonic biosensor utilizing fano resonance metasurface in THz range: Numerical study,” Phys. E, Vol. 104, pp. 233–40, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Li, Y. Zhu, Y. Hao, M. Gao, M. Lu, A. Stein, A. A. Park, J. C. Hone, Q. Lin, and N. Yu, “Hybrid metasurface-based mid-infrared biosensor for simultaneous quantification and identification of monolayer protein,” ACS Photonics, Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 501–9, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Altug, F. Yesilkoy, X. Li, M. Soler, A. Belushkin, Y. Jahani, R. Terborg, J. Pello, and V. Pruneri, “Photonic metasurfaces for next-generation biosensors,” in Integrated Photonics Research, Silicon and Nanophotonics, Optical Society of America, 2018, p. ITh3J-5.
   Google Scholar
• P. Singh, S. Kabiri Ameri, L. Chao, M. N. Afsar, and S. Sonkusale, “Broadband millimeterwave metamaterial absorber based on embedding of dual resonators,” Prog. Electromagn. Res., Vol. 142, pp. 625–38. 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Singh, K. A. Korolev, M. N. Afsar, and S. Sonkusale, “Single and dual band 77/95/110 GHz metamaterial absorbers on flexible polyimide substrate,” Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 99, no. 26, p. 264101, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Farahbakhsh, D. Zarifi, and A. U. Zaman, “A mm wave wideband slot array antenna based on ridge gap waveguide with 30% bandwidth,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 1008–13, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajni and A. Marwaha, “An accurate approach of mathematical modeling of SRR and SR for metamaterials,” J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev., Vol. 9, pp. 6, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• K. P. Kaur and T. Upadhyaya, “Wide-angle and polarisation-independent tri-band dual-layer microwave metamaterial absorber,” IET Microw. Antennas Propag., Vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1428–1434, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. S. Dhillon, D. Mittal, and R. Bargota, “Triple band ultrathin polarization insensitive metamaterial absorber for defense, explosive detection and airborne radar applications,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., Vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. P. Kaur, T. Upadhyaya, M. Palandoken, and C. Gocen, “Ultrathin dual-layer triple-band flexible microwave metamaterial absorber for energy harvesting applications,” Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng., Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. e21646, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar