Secured Model for Internet of Things (IoT) to Monitor Smart Field Data with Integrated Real-Time Cloud Using Lightweight Cryptography

REFERENCES

• B. Buurman, J. Kamruzzaman, G. Karmakar, and S. Islam, “Low-power wide-area networks: design goals, architecture, suitability to Use cases and research challenges,” IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 17179–17220, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Frustaci, P. Pace, G. Aloi, and G. Fortino, “Evaluating critical security issues of the IoT world: present and future challenges,” IEEE Internet Things J., Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2483–2495, Aug. 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. J. Dhas, and P. Jeyanthi, “A review on Internet of things protocol and service oriented middleware,” in 2019 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP), Chennai, India, 2019, pp. 0104–0108.
   Google Scholar
• A. B. Alexandru, K. Gatsis, Y. Shoukry, S. A. Seshia, P. Tabuada, and G. J. Pappas, “Cloud-based quadratic optimization with partially homomorphic encryption,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2357–2364, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Ren, S. Yu, W. Lou, and Y. Zhang, “Multi-user broadcast authentication in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 4554–4564, Oct. 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Aghapour, M. Kaveh, D. Martín, and M. R. Mosavi, “An ultra-lightweight and provably secure broadcast authentication protocol for smart grid communications,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 8, pp. 125477–125487, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Kothmayr, C. Schmitt, W. Hu, M. Brünig, and G. Carle, “DTLS based security and two-way authentication for the Internet of things,” Ad HocNetw., Vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2710–2723, Sep. 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Szczechowiak, L. B. Oliveira, M. Scott, M. Collier, and R. Dahab, “NanoECC: testing the limits of elliptic curve cryptography in sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN), Bologna, Italy, 2008, pp. 305–320.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Lv, W. Zhang, N. Li, C. Chen, and J. Cai, “A highly reliable lightweight distribution network communication encryption scheme,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Power Data Science (ICPDS), Taizhou, China, 2019, pp. 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• C.-C. Chang, and H.-D. Le, “A provably secure, efficient, and flexible authentication scheme for ad hoc wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 357–366, Jan. 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. K. Das, S. Kumari, V. Odelu, X. Li, F. Wu, and X. Huang, “Provably secure user authentication and key agreement scheme for wireless sensor networks,” Secur. Commun. Netw., Vol. 9, no. 16, pp. 3670–3687, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Thirumalai, S. Mohan, and G. Srivastava, “An efficient public key secure scheme for cloud and IoT security,” Comput. Commun., Vol. 150, pp. 634–643, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. P. Shah, and P. G. Shah, “Revisting of elliptical curve cryptography for securing Internet of Things (IOT),” in 2018 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Abu Dhabi, 2018, pp. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• S. Raza, L. Seitz, D. Sitenkov, and G. Selander, “S3k: scalable security with symmetric keys—DTLS Key establishment for the Internet of things,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1270–1280, July 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Wu, et al., “A fast and efficient source authentication solution for broadcasting in wireless sensor networks,” in New Technologies, Mobility and Security, Nashville, TN: Springer, Institute for Software Integrated Systems, 2007, pp. 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• R. Ali, A. K. Pal, S. Kumari, M. Karuppiah, and M. Conti, “A secure user authentication and key-agreement scheme using wireless sensor networks for agriculture monitoring,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2017. doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Chen, T.-F. Lee, and J.-I. Pan, “An enhanced lightweight dynamic pseudonym identity based authentication and key agreement scheme using wireless sensor networks for agriculture monitoring,” Sensors, Vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1–24, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tripathy, A. R. Tripathy, S. Rath, O. P. Jena, and S. Swagatika, “Rivest cipher 4 cryptography and elliptical curve cryptography techniques to secure data in cloud,” in Intelligent and Cloud Computing, Singapore: Springer, 2021, doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5971-6_69.
   Google Scholar
• S. Tangade, S. S. Manvi, and P. Lorenz, “Trust management scheme based on hybrid cryptography for secure communications in VANETs,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 5232–5243, May 2020. doi:10.1109/TVT.2020.2981127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. B. Bhanu, K. R. Rao, J. V. N. Ramesh, and M. A. Hussain, “Agriculture field monitoring and analysis using wireless sensor networks for improving crop production,” in 2014 Eleventh International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks (WOCN), Vijayawada, 2014, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• W. Iqbal, H. Abbas, M. Daneshmand, B. Rauf, and Y. A. Bangash, “An In-depth analysis of IoT security requirements, challenges, and their countermeasures via software-defined security,” IEEE Internet Things J., Vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 10250–10276, Oct. 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Butun, P. Osterberg, and H. Song, “Security of the Internet of things: vulnerabilities, attacks, and countermeasures,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 616–644, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Abdullah, R. Hamad, M. Abdulrahman, H. Moala, and S. Elkhediri, “Cybersecurity: a review of Internet of Things (IoT) security issues, challenges and techniques,” in 2019 2nd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2019, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• T. Nie, and T. Zhang, “A study of DES and Blowfish encryption algorithm,” in TENCON 2009 – 2009 IEEE Region 10 Conference, Singapore, 2009, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• C. J. Mitchell, “On the security of 2-Key Triple DES,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 6260–6267, Nov. 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Feldhofer, et al., “Strong authentication for RFID systems using the AES algorithm,” in Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems –CHESS 2004 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2004, pp. 357–370.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mousa, “Data encryption performance based on blowfish,” in 47th International Symposium ELMAR, 2005, Zadar, 2005, pp. 131–134.
   Google Scholar
• D. V. Penumetcha, J. Xie, and S. Ren, “FPGA design space exploration of IDEA cryptography IP core,” in 2015 IEEE 58th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), Fort Collins, CO, 2015, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• R. Sinha, et al., “Performance based Comparison study of RSA and elliptic curve cryptography,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., Vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 720–725, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• I. A. Landge, and H. Satopay, “Secured IoT through hashing using MD5,” in 2018 Fourth International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronics, Information, Communication and Bio-Informatics (AEEICB), Chennai, 2018, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• S. Lee, and K. Shin, “An efficient implementation of SHA processor including three hash algorithms (SHA-512, SHA-512/224, SHA-512/256),” in 2018 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC), Honolulu, HI, 2018, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar