Surface Electromyogram Feature Set Optimization for Lower Limb Activity Classification

References

• A. Parri, et al., “Whole body awareness for controlling a robotic transfemoral prosthesis,” Front. Neurorobot, Vol. 11, no. May, pp. 1–14, 2017. doi:10.3389/fnbot.2017.00025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Windrich, M. Grimmer, O. Christ, S. Rinderknecht, and P. Beckerle, “Active lower limb prosthetics: a systematic review of design issues and solutions,” Biomed. Eng. Online, Vol. 15, no. S3, pp. 5–19, 2016. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0284-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S. Au, M. Berniker, and H. Herr, “Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits,” Neural Netw., Vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 654–666, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Cherelle, V. Grosu, A. Matthys, B. Vanderborght, and D. Lefeber, “Design and validation of the ankle mimicking,” IEEE Trans. NEURAL Syst. Rehabil. Eng, Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 138–148, 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. E. Joshi, D. Hahn, D. Joshi, M. E. Hahn, M. E. Joshi, and D. Hahn, “Terrain and direction classification of locomotion transitions using neuromuscular and mechanical input,” Ann. Biomed. Eng, Vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1275–1284, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1407-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Vallery, R. Burgkart, C. Hartmann, J. Mitternacht, R. Riener, and M. Buss, “Complementary limb motion estimation for the control of active knee prostheses,” Biomed. Tech, Vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2011. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2010.057.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. Joshi, R. Singh, R. Ribeiro, S. Srivastava, U. Singh, and S. Anand, “Development of echo control strategy for AK prosthesis: An embedded system approach,” in International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology, ICSMB 2010 – Proceedings, no. December, 2010, pp. 143–147. doi: 10.1109/ICSMB.2010.5735361
   Google Scholar
• K. Yuan, Q. Wang, and L. Wang, “Fuzzy-logic-based terrain identification with multisensor fusion for transtibial amputees,” IEEE Trans. Mechatronics, Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 618–630, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Chen, E. Zheng, and Q. Wang, “A locomotion intent prediction system based on multi-sensor fusion,” Sensors, Vol. 14, pp. 12349–12369, 2014. doi:10.3390/s140712349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. J. Young, and L. J. Hargrove, “A classification method for user-independent intent recognition for transfemoral amputees using powered lower limb prostheses,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng, Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 217–225, 2016. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2412461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. J. Young, A. M. Simon, N. P. Eey, and L. J. Hargrove, “Intent recognition in a powered lower limb prosthesis using time history information,” Ann. Biomed. Eng, Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 631–641, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0909-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. D. Miller, M. S. Beazer, and M. E. Hahn, “Myoelectric walking mode classification for transtibial amputees,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng, Vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 2745–2750, 2013. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2264466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. D. Hoover, G. D. Fulk, and K. B. Fite, “Stair ascent with a powered transfemoral prosthesis under direct myoelectric control,” IEEE Trans. Mechatronics, Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1191–1200, 2013. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2012.2200498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. A. Varol, F. Sup, and M. Goldfarb, “Multiclass real-time intent recognition of a powered lower limb prosthesis,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng, Vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 542–551, 2010. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2034734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Sup, H. A. Varol, and M. Goldfarb, “Upslope walking with a powered knee and ankle prosthesis: initial results with an amputee subject,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng, Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2011. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2087360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Chen, et al., “A foot-wearable interface for locomotion mode recognition based on discrete contact force distribution,” Mechatronics (Oxford), Vol. 32, no. October, pp. 12–21, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.09.002.
   Google Scholar
• A. J. Young, A. M. Simon, and L. J. Hargrove, “A training method for locomotion mode prediction using powered lower limb prostheses,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng, Vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 671–677, 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. S. Dhindsa, R. Agarwal, and H. S. Ryait, “Principal component analysis-based muscle identification for myoelectric-controlled exoskeleton knee,” J. Appl. Stat, Vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1707–1720, 2016. doi: 10.1080/02664-763.2016.1221907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. T. Farrell, and H. Herr. “A method to determine the optimal features for control of a powered lower-limb prostheses,” in 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2011, pp. 6041–6046.
   Google Scholar
• X. Zhang, D. Wang, Q. Yang, and H. Huang. “An automatic and user-driven training method for locomotion mode recognition for artificial leg control,” in 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2012, pp. 6116–6119.
   Google Scholar
• L. Du, F. Zhang, M. Liu, and H. Huang, “Toward design of an environment-aware adaptive locomotion-mode-recognition system,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng, Vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 2716–2725, 2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Zhang, and H. Huang, “Source selection for real-time user intent recognition toward volitional control of artificial legs,” IEEE J. Biomed. Heal. Informatics, Vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 907–914, 2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. J. Young, T. A. Kuiken, and L. J. Hargrove, “Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses,” J. Neural Eng., Vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1–12, 2014. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/5/056021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. A. Spanias, A. M. Simon, K. A. Ingraham, and L. J. Hargrove, “Effect of Additional Mechanical Sensor Data on an EMG – based Pattern Recognition System for a Powered Leg Prosthesis,” in IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2015, pp. 22–24. doi: 10.1109/NER.2015.7146704.
   Google Scholar
• M. Liu, D. Wang, and H. H. Huang, “Development of an environment-aware locomotion mode recognition system for powered lower limb prostheses,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 434–443, 2016. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2420539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Huang, F. Zhang, L. J. Hargrove, Z. Dou, D. R. Rogers, and K. B. Englehart, “Continuous locomotion-mode identification for prosthetic Legs based on neuromuscular – mechanical fusion,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng, Vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2867–2875, 2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Young, A. Simon, and L. Hargrove, “An intent recognition strategy for transfemoral amputee ambulation across different locomotion modes,” in Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2013, pp. 1587–1590.
   Google Scholar
• S. Pati, D. Joshi, and A. Mishra. Locomotion classification using EMG signal,” in 2010 International Conference on Information and Emerging Technologies, 2010, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICIET.2010.5625677.
   Google Scholar
• H. Huang, F. Zhang, Y. L. Sun, and H. He, “Design of a robust EMG sensing interface for pattern classification,” J. Neural Eng, Vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 056005, 2010. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/5/056005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Afzal, K. Iqbal, G. White, and A. Wright, “A method for locomotion mode identification using muscle synergies,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng, Vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 608–617, 2017. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2585962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Chandrashekar, and F. Sahin, “A survey on feature selection methods,” Comput. Electr. Eng, Vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Soman, D. Jayadeva, S. Arjunan, and D. K. Kumar, “Improved sEMG signal classification using the Twin SVM,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2016 – Conference Proceedings, 2017, pp. 4507–4512. doi: 10.1109/SMC.2016.7844-942.
   Google Scholar
• P. Pudil, J. Novovičová, and J. Kittler, “Floating search methods in feature selection,” Pattern Recognit. Lett, Vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1119–1125, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0167-8655(94)90127-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Reunanen, “Overfitting in making comparisons between variable selection methods,” J. Mach. Learn. Res, Vol. 3, pp. 1371–1382, 2003. doi: 10.1162/153244303322753715.
   Google Scholar
• P. Somol, P. Pudil, J. Novovicova, and P. Paclik, “Adaptive floating search methods in feature selection,” Pattern Recognit. Lett, Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 88–100, 1999. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8655(99)00083-5.
   Google Scholar
• B. Xue, M. Zhang, S. Member, W. N. Browne, S. Member, and W. N. Browne, “Particle swarm optimization for feature selection in classification: a multi-objective approach,” IEEE Trans. Cybern, Vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1656–1671, 2013. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2227469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. J. Urbanowicz, M. Meeker, W. La Cava, R. S. Olson, and J. H. Moore, “Relief-based feature selection: introduction and review,” J. Biomed. Inform, Vol. 85, no. June, pp. 189–203, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• P. Pudil, and J. Novovicova, “Novel methods for subset selection with respect to problem knowledge,” IEEE Intell. Syst. Their Appl, Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 66–74, 1998. doi: 10.1109/5254.671094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Senliot, G. Gulgezen, L. Yu, and Z. Cataltepe, “Fast correlation based filter (FCBF) with a different search strategy,” in 23rd International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences, 1–4, 2008. doi: 10.1109/ISCIS.2008.4717949.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Hall, “Correlation-based feature selection for discrete and numeric class machine learning,” in 17th International Conference Machine Learning, 2000, pp. 359–366.
   Google Scholar
• SENIAM. “Sensors location: Recommendations for sensor locations on individual muscles,” 2016. http://seniam.org/sensor_location.htm (accessed Feb. 20, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Wireless Nexus-10. “A 10 channel physiological monitoring and feedback platform,” 2018.
   Google Scholar
• I. S. Dhindsa, R. Agarwal, and H. S. Ryait, “A Novel algorithm to predict knee angle from EMG signals for controlling a lower limb exoskeleton,” in International Conference Information Technology and Nanotechnology, 2016, pp. 536–541. doi: 10.18287/1613-0073-2016-1638-536-541
   Google Scholar
• R. Gupta, and R. Agarwal, “Electromyographic signal-driven continuous locomotion mode identification module design for lower limb prosthesis control,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng, Vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 7817–7835, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s13369-018-3193-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Nazmi, M. Abdul Rahman, S.-I. Yamamoto, S. Ahmad, H. Zamzuri, and S. Mazlan, “A review of classification techniques of EMG signals during isotonic and isometric contractions,” Sensors, Vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1304, 2016. doi: 10.3390/s16081304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Ai, Y. Zhang, W. Qi, Q. Liu, and K. Chen, “Research on lower limb motion recognition based on fusion of sEMG and accelerometer signals,” Symmetry (Basel)., Vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1–19, 2017. doi: 10.3390/sym9080147.
   Google Scholar
• K. Englehart, and B. Hudgins, “A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng, Vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 848–854, 2003. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.813539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. S. Dhindsa, R. Agarwal, and H. S. Ryait, “Performance evaluation of various classifiers for predicting knee angle from electromyography signals,” Expert Syst., Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. e12381, 2019. doi: 10.1111/exsy.12381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Gupta, and R. Agarwal, “sEMG interface design for locomotion identification,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng, Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 66–75, 2017. doi: 10.1999/1307-6892/10006174.
   Google Scholar
• R. Gupta, and R. Agarwal, “Continuous human locomotion identification for lower limb prosthesis control,” CSI Trans. ICT, Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s40012-017-0178-4.
   Google Scholar
• D. A. Winter, “Biomechanical motor patterns in normal walking,” J. Mot. Behav, Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 302–330, 1983. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1983.10735302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. Winter, “Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effects,” Hum. Mov. Sci, Vol. 3, pp. 51–76, 1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. Winter, and H. J. Yack, “EMG profiles during normal human walking: stride-to-stride and inter-subject variability,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol, Vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 402–411, 1987.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. A. Winter, “Human balance and posture standing and walking control during,” Gait Posture, Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 193–214, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• H. W. A. A. Van De Crommert, T. Mulder, and J. Duysens, “Neural control of locomotion: sensory control of the central pattern generator and its relation to treadmill training,” Gait Posture, Vol. 7, pp. 251–263, 1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. R. Dimitrijevic, I. Persy, C. Forstner, H. Kern, and M. M. Dimitrijevic, “Motor control in the human spinal cord,” Artifical Organs, Vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 216–219, 2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Jimenez-Fabian, and O. Verlinden, “Review of control algorithms for robotic ankle systems in lower-limb orthoses, prostheses, and exoskeletons,” Med. Eng. Phys, Vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 397–408, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.medeng-phy.2011.11.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Geethanjali, “Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: state-of-the-art review,” Med. Devices Evid. Res, Vol. 9, pp. 247–255, 2016. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S91102.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sokolova, and G. Lapalme, “A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks,” Inf. Process. Manag, Vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 427–437, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, C. Ling, and S. Li, “EMG signals based human action recognition via deep belief networks,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 52, no. 19, pp. 271–276, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.108.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, Q. Wu, N. Dey, S. Fong, and A. S. Ashour, “Deep back propagation–long short-term memory network based upper-limb sEMG signal classification for automated rehabilitation,” Biocybern. Biomed. Eng, Vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 987–1001, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Coskun, O. Yildirim, Y. Demir, and U. R. Acharya, “Efficient deep neural network model for classification of grasp types using sEMG signals,” J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. (2021). doi: 10.1007/s12652-021-03284-9.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, C. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Wang, and Y. Li., “Hand gesture recognition using sparse autoencoder-based deep neural network based on electromyography measurements,” 2018.
   Google Scholar