Prioritization and Selection of the Software Requirements using Rough-Set Theory

References

• P. Achimugu, A. Selamat, R. Ibrahim, and M. N. Mahrin, “A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research,” Inf. Softw. Technol., Vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 568–85, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. Pitangueira, R. S. P. Maciel, and M. Barros, “Software requirements selection and prioritization using SBSE approaches: A systematic literature review and mapping of literature,” J. Syst. Softw., Vol. 103, pp. 267–80, 2015. DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Hujainah, R. B. U. Bakar, M. A. A. Abdulgabber, and K. Zamli, “Software requirements prioritization: A systematic literature review on significance, stakeholders, techniques and challenges,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 6, pp. 71497–523, 2018. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2881755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Misaghian, and H. Motameni, “An approach for requirements prioritization based on tensor decomposition,” Requir. Eng., Vol. 23, pp. 169–88, 2018. DOI:10.1007/s00766-016-0262-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sadiq, “A fuzzy-set based approach for the prioritization of stakeholders on the basis of the importance of software requirements,” IETE. J. Res., Vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 616–29, 2017. DOI:10.1080/03772063.2017.1313140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Kaiya, H. Horai, and M. Saeki, “AGORA: Attributed goal-oriented requirements analysis method,” in Proc. IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, 2002, Essen, Germany, 2002, pp. 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sadiq, and S. K. Jain, “Applying fuzzy preference relation for requirements prioritization in goal oriented requirements elicitation process,” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag., Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 711–23, 2014. DOI:10.1007/s13198-014-0236-3.
   Google Scholar
• R. Singh, S. Avikal, R. Rashmi, and M. Ram, “A Kano model, AHP and TOPSIS based approach for selecting the best mobile phone under a fuzzy environment,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., Vol. 37, no. 6/7, pp. 837–51, 2020. DOI:10.1108/IJQRM-01-2020-0022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kamlu, and V. Laxmi, “Implementation of fuzzy model for maintenance scheduling of vehicles based on Monte Carlo simulation and geographical information system,” IETE. J. Res., Vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 225–37, 2017. DOI:10.1080/03772063.2016.1253510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sadiq, and V. S. Devi, “A rough-set based approach for the selection of software requirements,” Int. J. Inf. Technol., 1–11, 2021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S. U. R. Khan, S. P. Lee, M. Dabbagh, M. Tahir, M. Khan, and M. Arif, “Repizer: A framework for prioritization of software requirements,” Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng., Vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 750–65, 2016. DOI:10.1631/FITEE.1500162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Achimugu, A. Selamat, and R. Ibrahim, “Reprotizer: A fully implemented software requirements prioritization tool,” Trans. Comput. Collect. Intell. XXII, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., Vol. 9655, 80–105, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• J. Azar, R. K. Smith, and D. Cordes, “Value-oriented requirements prioritization in a small development organization,” IEEE Softw., 32–37, 2007. DOI:10.1109/MS.2007.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Achimugu, A. Selamat, and R. Ibrahim, “A web-based multi-criteria decision making tool for software requirements prioritization,” Comput. Collect. Intell. Technol. Appl., 444–53, 2014. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-11289-3_45.
   Google Scholar
• T. Bebensee, I. van de Weerd, and S. Brinkkemper, “Binary priority list for prioritizing software requirements,” Requir. Eng.: Found. Softw. Qual., 67–78, 2010. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-14192-8_8.
   Google Scholar
• J. Karlsson, and K. Ryan, “A cost–value approach for prioritizing requirements,” IEEE Softw., Vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 67–74, 1997. DOI:10.1109/52.605933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. Neil, and N. Cornelius, “Acquiring COTS software selection requirements,” IEEE Softw., Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 46–56, 1998. DOI:10.1109/52.663784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Fellir, K. Nafil, and R. Touahni, “System requirements prioritization based on AHP,” in 3rd International Colloquium in Information Science and Technology, 2014, pp. 163–67.
   Google Scholar
• K. Yamamoto, and M. Saeki, “Attributed goal oriented analysis method for selecting alternatives of software requirements,” IEICE Trans. Inf Syst., Vol. E-91-D, no. 4, pp. 921–32, 2008. DOI:10.1093/ietisy/e91-d.4.921.
   Google Scholar
• R. Thakurta, “A framework for prioritization of quality requirements for inclusion in a software project,” Softw. Qual. J., Vol. 21, pp. 573–97, 2012. DOI:10.1007/s11219-012-9188-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Perini, F. Ricca, and A. Susi, “Tool-supported requirements prioritization: Comparing the AHP and CBRank methods,” Inf. Softw. Technol., Vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1021–32, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Lehtola, and M. Kauppinen, “Empirical evaluation of two requirements prioritization methods in product development projects,” Softw. Process Improv. EuroSPI, 161–70, 2004. DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-30181-3_15.
   Google Scholar
• L. Lehtola, and M. Kauppinen, “Suitability of requirements prioritization methods for market driven software product development,” Softw Process: Improv. Pract, Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7–19, 2006. DOI:10.1002/spip.249.
   Google Scholar
• M. Dabbagh, S. P. Lee, and R. M. Parizi, “Functional and non-functional requirements prioritization: Empirical evaluation of IPA, AHP-based, and HAM-based approaches,” Soft. Comput., Vol. 20, pp. 4497–520, 2016. DOI:10.1007/s00500-015-1760-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Dabbagh, and S. P. Lee, “An approach for integrating the prioritization of functional and nonfunctional requirements,” Scientific World J., 1–13, 2014. DOI:10.1155/2014/737626.
   Google Scholar
• P. Voola, and A. V. Babu, “Comparison of requirements prioritization techniques employing different scales of measurement,” ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, Vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2013. DOI:10.1145/2492248.2492278.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ahmad, A. Shahzad, V. K. Padmanabhuni, A. Mansoor, S. Joseph, and Z. Arshad, “Requirements prioritization with respect to geographically distributed stakeholders,” in IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering, 2011, pp. 290–4.
   Google Scholar
• M. Vestola. A Comparison of Nine Basic Techniques for Requirements Prioritization. Finland: Helsinki University of Technology, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Y.-H. Chen, T.-C. Wang, and C.-Y. Wu, “Multi-criteria decision making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations,” Appl. Math. Model., Vol. 35, pp. 1322–30, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2010.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Herrera, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., Vol. 115, no. issue 1, pp. 67–82, 2000. DOI:10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00024-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. X. Zhu, X.-X. Luo, X. H. Chen, and D. D. Wu, “A non-functional requirements trade off model in trustworthy software,” Inf. Sci., Vol. 191, pp. 61–75, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2011.07.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Mishra, M. A. Khanum, and K. Agrawal, “Approach to prioritize the requirements using fuzzy logic,” in ACEIT Conference Proceedings, 2016, pp. S42–S47.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ejnioui, C. E. Otero, and A. A. Qureshi, “Software requirement prioritization using fuzzy multi-attribute decision making,” in IEEE International Conference on Open Systems, 2012, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• H. Momeni, H. Motameni, and M. Larimi, “A neuro fuzzy based approach to software quality requirements prioritization,” Int. J. Appl. Info Syst., Vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 15–20, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• D. Mougouei, D. M. W. Powers, and E. Mougouei, “A fuzzy framework for prioritization and partial selection of security requirements in software projects,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 2671–86, 2019. DOI:10.3233/JIFS-182907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. C. Lima, F. Freitas, G. Campos, and J. Souza, “A fuzzy approach to requirements prioritization,” Search Based Softw. Eng., 64–69, 2011. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-23716-4_8.
   Google Scholar
• P. Achimugu, A. Selamat, and R. Ibrahim, “Using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for requirements prioritization,” J. Teknologi, Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 21–25, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Y. V. Singh, B. Kumar, and S. Chand, “A novel approach for requirements prioritization using logarithmic fuzzy trapezoidal AHP for enhancing academic library service,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, Control, and Networking, 2018, pp. 1164–72.
   Google Scholar
• P. Bajaj, and V. Arora, “Multi-person decision making for requirements prioritization using fuzzy AHP,” ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, Vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2013. DOI:10.1145/2507288.2507302.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sadiq, and A. Afrin, “An integrated approach for the selection of software requirements using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS method,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation, and Control Technology, 2017, pp. 1094–100.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sadiq, S. Khan, and C. W. Mohammad, “Selection and software requirements using TOPSIS under fuzzy environment,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., 1–10, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• K. S. Ahmad, N. Ahmad, H. Tahir, and S. Khan, “Fuzzy MoSCoW: A fuzzy based MoSCoW method for the prioritization of the software requirements,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation, and Control Technologies, 2017, pp. 433–7.
   Google Scholar
• B. B. Jawale, G. K. Patnaik, and A. T. Bhola, “Requirements prioritization using adaptive fuzzy hierarchical cumulative voting,” in Proc. IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference, 2017, pp. 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• V. Gaur, and A. Soni, “An integrated approach to prioritize requirements using fuzzy decision making,” IACSIT Int. J. Eng. Technol., Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 320–8, 2010. doi:10.7763/IJET.2010.V2.141
   Google Scholar
• A. Ejnioui, C. E. Otero, and L. D. Otero, “A simulation-based fuzzy multi-attribute decision making for prioritizing software requirements,” in Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Research in Information Technology, 2012, ACM Digital Library, pp. 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• C. W. Mohammad, M. Shahid, and S. Z. Hussain, “Fuzzy attributed goal-oriented software requirements analysis with multiple stakeholders,” Int. J. Inf. Technol., 1–9, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• P. A. M. Barbosa, P. R. Pinheiro, F. R. V. Silveira, and M. H. Filho, “Selection and prioritization of software requirements applying verbal decision analysis,” Complex, Vol. 2019, 1–20, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. Asif, Z. Masud, R. Easmin, and A. U. Gias, “SAFFRON: A semi-automated framework for software requirements prioritization,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., Vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 491–499, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• M. Dabbagh, and S. P. Lee, “An approach for prioritizing NFRs according to their relationship with FRs,” Lecture Notes Softw. Eng., Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2015. doi:10.7763/LNSE.2015.V3.154
   Google Scholar
• F. Hujainah, R. B. A. Baker, and M. A. Abdulgabber, “StackQP: A semi-automated stakeholder quantification and prioritization techniques for requirements selection in software system projects,” Decis Support Syst., Vol. 121, pp. 94–108, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2019.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Y. Zhai, L. P. Khoo, and Z. W. Zhong, “A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vol. 37, pp. 613–24, 2008. doi:10.1007/s00170-007-0989-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Shao, R. Peng, H. Lai, and B. Wong, “Drank: A semi-automated requirements prioritization method based on preferences and dependencies,” J. Systems Softw., Vol. 126, pp. 141–56, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Perini, F. Ricca, A. Susi, and C. Bazzanella, “An empirical study to compare the accuracy of AHP and CBRanking techniques for requirements prioritization,” in Fifth International Workshops on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, 2007, pp. 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• M. I. Babar, M. Ghazali, D. N. A. Jawawi, S. M. Shamsuddin, and N. Ibrahim, “PHandler: An expert system for a scalable software requirements prioritization process,” Knowl. Based Syst., Vol. 84, pp. 179–202, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Pawlak, “Rough sets,” Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci., Vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 341–56, 1982. doi:10.1007/BF01001956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Pawlak, and A. Skowron, “Rudiments of rough set,” Inf. Sci., Vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 3–27, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2006.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Lee, H. Lee, H. Seol, and Y. Park, “Evaluation of new concepts using rough set theory and group analytic hierarchy process,” Expert. Syst. Appl., Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 3404–12, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Krusinska, R. Slowinski, and J. Stefanowski, “Discriminant versus rough set approach to vague data analysis,” Appl. Stoch. Models Data Anal., Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–56, 1992. doi:10.1002/asm.3150080107
   Google Scholar
• A. Skowron, and C. Rauszer, “The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems,” in Intelligent Decision Support. Theory and Decision Library (Series D: System Theory, Knowledge Engineering and Problem Solving, R. Słowiński, Ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 1992, pp. 331–62.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Pawlak, J. W. Grzymala-Busse, R. Slowinski, and W. Ziarko, “Rough sets,” Communication ACM, Vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 89–95, 1995. DOI:10.1145/219717.219791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. C. Ballejos, and J. M. Montagna, “Method for stakeholder identification in interorganizational environments,” Requirements Eng., Vol. 13, pp. 281–97, 2008. DOI:10.1007/s00766-008-0069-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Dieste, and N. Juristo, “Systematic review and aggregation of empirical studies on elicitation techniques,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., Vol. 37, no. Issue 2, pp. 283–304, 2011. DOI:10.1109/TSE.2010.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Y. Zhai, L. P. Khoo, and Z. W. Zhong, “Towards a QFD-based expert system: A novel extension to fuzzy QFD methodology using rough set theory,” Expert Syst. Appl., Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 8, 8888–96, 2010.
   Google Scholar