A Review on Static Reconfiguration Techniques of Solar PV to Mitigate Mismatch Loss and Minimize Partial Shading Effect

References

• G. D. Kamalapur and R.Y. Udaykumar, “Rural electrification in India and feasibility of photovoltaic Solar home systems,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., Vol. 33, pp. 594–599, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. A. Z. I. Atika, et al., Towards sustainable energy: a systematic review of renewable energy sources, technologies, and public opinions.
   Google Scholar
• P. Kumar, P. Kumar, S. Kumar, A.A. Adelodun, and K.-H. Kim, “Solar energy: potential and future prospects,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 82, pp. 894–900, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Elavarasan, “The motivation for renewable energy and its comparison with other energy sources: a review,” Eur. J. Sustain. Develop. Res., Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. em0076, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• N. Kannan and D. Vakeesan, “Solar energy for future world: a review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 62, pp. 1092–1105, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Haque, et al., “Research on solar photovoltaic (PV) energy conversion system: an overview,” in Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Information Technology (CIIT), 2013.
   Google Scholar
• R. M. Elavarasan, et al., “A comprehensive review on renewable energy development, challenges, and policies of leading Indian states with an international perspective,” IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 74432–74457, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Bala Rau, et al., “Power enhancement of solar PV arrays under partial shading conditions with reconfiguration methods,” in Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Online available: Most common types of solar panel. https://customenergy.com/4-most-popular-types-of-solar-panels-explained.
   Google Scholar
• Online available: Solar cell efficiency tables. Green MA, Emery K, Hishikawa Y, Warta W, Dunlop ED. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 47). Prog Photovolt. 2016; 24:3–11.
   Google Scholar
• H. Farhangi, “The path of the smart grid,” IEEE Power Energy Mag., Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Kroposki, B. Johnson, Y Zhang, V Gevorgian, P. Denholm, B.-M. Hodge, and B. Hannegan, “Achieving a 100% renewable grid: operating electric power systems with extremely high levels of variable renewable energy,” IEEE Power Energy Mag., Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 61–73,2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Yu, P Zhang, and W. Xiao, “Communication systems for grid integration of renewable energy resources,” IEEE Netw., Vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 22–29, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Heile, “Smart grids for green communications [industry perspectives,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 4–6, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• M. H. Rehmani, M. Reisslein, A. Rachedi, M. Erol-Kantarci, and M Radenkovic, “Integrating renewable energy resources into the smart grid: recent developments in information and communication technologies,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., Vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2814–2825, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Khare, S. Nema, and P Baredar, “Solar–wind hybrid renewable energy system: a review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 58, pp. 23–33, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Online available: Power sector at a glance ALL INDIA. https://powermin.nic.in/en/content/power-sector-glance-all-india.
   Google Scholar
• S. K. Gupta, et al., “Development of solar electricity supply system in India: an overview,” Hindawi Publish. Corp. J. Solar Energy, 2013, Article ID 632364, 10 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Online available: Renewable energy June 2020 report of IBEF. https://www.ibef.org/download/Renewable-Energy-June-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• G. Raina and S. Sinha, “Outlook on the Indian scenario of solar energy strategies: policies and challenges,” Energy Strat. Rev., Vol. 24, pp. 331–341, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. D. Kaushika and N.K. Gautam, “Energy yield simulations of interconnected solar PV arrays,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 127–134, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. G. Nalin and N.D. Kaushika, “Reliability evaluation of solar photovoltaic arrays,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 129–141, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Bonthagorla, and S. Mikkili, “Optimal PV array configuration for extracting maximum power under partial shading conditions by mitigating mismatching power loss,” CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. doi:10.17775/CSEEJPES.2019.02730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. Pendem and S. Mikkili, “Modelling and performance assessment of PV array topologies under partial shading conditions to mitigate the mismatching power losses,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 160, pp. 303–321, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zheng, S. Li, R. Challoo, and J. Proano, “Shading and bypass diode impacts to energy extraction of PV arrays under different converter configurations,” Renew. Energy, Vol. 68, pp. 58–66, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Bonthagorla, and S. Mikkili, “Performance investigation of hybrid and conventional PV array configurations for grid-connected/standalone PV systems,” CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. doi:10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.02510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Bonthagorla, and S. Mikkili, “Performance analysis of PV array configurations (SP, BL, HC and TT) to enhance maximum power under non-uniform shading conditions,” Eng. Rep., 2020. doi:10.1002/eng2.12214.
   Google Scholar
• B. Nayak, A. Mohapatra, and P. Das, “Optimal hybrid array configuration scheme to reduce mismatch losses of photovoltaic system," in 2017 Second International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT), 2017, pp. 145–153. doi:10.1109/ICECCT.2017.8117990.
   Google Scholar
• D. C. Chengaiah, et al., “Power enhancement of solar PV arrays under partial shading conditions with reconfiguration methods,” in Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), 2019.
   Google Scholar
• P. K. Bonthagorla, and S. Mikkili, “A novel fixed PV array configuration for harvesting maximum power from shaded modules by reducing the number of cross-ties,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power. Electron., Vol. 9, pp. 2109–2122, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. Satpathy, et al., “Comparative study of interconnection schemes of modules in solar PV array network,” in International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies, Kollam, 2017, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• R. Ramaprabha, et al., “A comprehensive review and analysis of solar photovoltaic array configurations under partial shaded conditions,” Int. J. Photoenergy, Vol. 2012, p. 6, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Singh, I. Hussain, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Peak power detection of PS solar PV panel by using WPSCO,” IET Renew. Power Gener., Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 480–489, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, I. Hussain, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Single sensor-based MPPT of partially shaded PV system for battery charging by using Cauchy and Gaussian sine cosine optimization,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., Vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 983–992, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Singh, N.R. Patne, V.S. Kale, and P. Khadke, “Digital impedance pilot relaying scheme for STATCOM compensated TL for fault phase classification with fault location,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2586–2598, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, I. Hussain, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Normal harmonic search algorithm-based MPPT for solar PV system and integrated with grid using reduced sensor approach and PNKLMS algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 6343–6352, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, I. Hussain, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Maximum power peak detection of partially shaded PV panel by using intelligent monkey king evolution algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 5734–5743, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, I. Hussain, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “MPPT in dynamic condition of partially shaded PV system by using WODE technique,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1204–1214, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, I. Hussain, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Rapid MPPT for uniformly and partial shaded PV system by using JayaDE algorithm in highly fluctuating atmospheric conditions,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., Vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2406–2416, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. S. Satapathy and N. Kumar, “Framework of maximum power point tracking for solar PV panel using WSPS technique,” IET Renew. Power Gener., Vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1668–1676, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, B. Singh, J. Wang, and B.K. Panigrahi, “A Framework of L-HC and AM-MKF for accurate harmonic supportive control schemes,” IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Regul. Pap., Vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 5246–5256, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Integration of solar PV with low-voltage weak grid system: using normalized Laplacian Kernel adaptive Kalman filter and learning based InC algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 10746–10758, 2019. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2019.2898319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Integration of solar PV with low-voltage weak grid system: using maximize-M Kalman filter and self-tuned P&O algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 9013–9022, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “PNKLMF-based neural network control and learning-based HC MPPT technique for multiobjective grid integrated solar PV based distributed generating system,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., Vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 3732–3742, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Mathuria, I. Hussain, B. Singh, and N. Kumar, “A quadrature oscillator-based DT for accurate estimation of fundamental load current for PV system in distribution network,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., Vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 3324–3333, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Framework of gradient descent least squares regression-based NN structure for power quality improvement in PV-integrated low-voltage weak grid system,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 9724–9733, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “LLMLF-based control approach and LPO MPPT technique for improving performance of a multifunctional three-phase two-stage grid integrated PV system,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 371–380, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, B. Singh, B.K. Panigrahi, and L. Xu, “Leaky-least-logarithmic-absolute-difference-based control algorithm and learning-based InC MPPT technique for grid-integrated PV system,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 9003–9012, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, I. Hussain, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Implementation of multilayer fifth-order generalized integrator-based adaptive control for grid-Tied solar PV energy conversion system,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., Vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2857–2868, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “ANOVA Kernel Kalman filter for multi-objective grid integrated solar photovoltaic-distribution static compensator,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Regul. Pap., Vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 4256–4264, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Ul. Nazir, N. Kumar, B.C. Pal, B. Singh, and B.K. Panigrahi, “Enhanced SOGI controller for weak grid integrated solar PV system,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., Vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1208–1217, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Singh, N. Kumar, and B. K. Panigrahi, “Steepest Descent Laplacian regression based neural network approach for optimal operation of grid supportive solar PV generation,” IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. II Exp Bri, Vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1947–1951, Jun. 2021. doi:10.1109/TCSII.2020.2967106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Saxena, N. Kumar, B. Singh, and B. K. Panigrahi, “A voltage support control strategy for grid integrated solar PV system during abnormal grid conditions utilizing Interweaved GI,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 8149–8157, Sep. 2021. doi:10.1109/TIE.2020.3013771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. Mac Alpine, R.W. Erickson, and M.J. Brandemuehl, “Characterization of power optimizer potential to increase energy capture in photovoltaic systems operating under nonuniform conditions,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2936–2945, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. v. Chikate, et al., “The factors affecting the performance of solar cell. IJCA proceedings,” in International Conference on Advancements in Engineering and Technology (ICAET 2015) ICQUEST 2015(1):4–8, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• M. Z. Shams El-Dein, M. Kazerani, and M.M.A. Salama, “Optimal photovoltaic array reconfiguration to reduce partial shading losses,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 145–153, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. R. Sullivan, J.J. Awerbuch, and A.M. Latham, “Decrease in photovoltaic power output from ripple: simple general calculation and the effect of partial shading,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 740–747, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Bayrak, G. Ertürk, and H.F. Oztop, “Effects of partial shading on energy and exergy efficiencies for photovoltaic panels," J. Cleaner Prod., Vol. 164, pp. 58–69, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, X. Lin, Y. Kim, N. Chang, and M. Pedram, “Architecture and control algorithms for combating partial shading in photovoltaic systems,” IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circ. Syst., Vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 917–930, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Vemuru, et al., “Modeling impact of bypass diodes on photovoltaic cell performance under partial shading,” in IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology, Indianapolis, IN, 2012, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Al Mamun, Md. Hasanuzzaman, and J. Selvaraj, “Experimental investigation of the effect of partial shading on photovoltaic performance,” IET Renew. Power Gener., Vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 912–921, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Rahmann, V. Vittal, J. Ascui, and J. Haas, “Mitigation control against partial shading effects in large-scale PV power plants,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 173–180, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Alonsogarcia, J. M. Ruiz, F. Chenlo, “Experimental study of mismatch and shading effects in the – characteristic of a photovoltaic module,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, Vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 329–340, 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. D. Bidram, A. Davoudi, and R.S. Balog, “Control and circuit techniques to mitigate partial shading effects in photovoltaic arrays,” IEEE J. Photovolt., Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 532–546, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Sera, R. Teodorescu, and P. Rodriguez, “PV panel model based on datasheet values,” in IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Vigo, 2007, pp. 2392–2396.
   Google Scholar
• G. Sai Krishna and T. Moger, “Reconfiguration strategies for reducing partial shading effects in photovoltaic arrays: state of the art,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 182, pp. 429–452, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Venkateswarlu and N. Rajasekar, “Power enhancement of PV system via physical array reconfiguration based Lo Shu technique,” Energy Convers. Manage., Vol. 215, pp. 112885, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. B. Bollipo, S. Mikkili, and P. K. Bonthagorla, “Hybrid, optimal, intelligent and classical PV MPPT techniques: a review,” CSEE J. Power Energy Syst., Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–33, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. D. Siddique, S. Mekhilef, N.M. Shah, A. Sarwar, A. Iqbal, and M.A. Memon, “A new multilevel inverter topology with reduce switch count,” IEEE Access, Vol. 7, pp. 58584–58594, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. G. Agelidis, et al., “A multilevel PWM inverter topology for photovoltaic applications,” in ISIE ‘97 Proceeding of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Guimaraes, Portugal, 1997, pp. 589–594.
   Google Scholar
• K. S. Parlak, and M. Karaköse, “An efficient reconfiguration method based on standard deviation for series and parallel connected PV arrays,” in International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA), Milwaukee, WI, 2014, pp. 457–461.
   Google Scholar
• P. d. S. Vicente, et al., “Photovoltaic array reconfiguration strategy for maximization of energy production,” Int. J. Photoenergy, Vol. 2015, p. 11, 2015, Article ID 592383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. Ajmal, T. Sudhakar Babu, V.K. Ramachandaramurthy, D. Yousri, and J.B. Ekanayake, “Static and dynamic reconfiguration approaches for mitigation of partial shading influence in photovoltaic arrays,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., Vol. 40, pp. 100738, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Liu, and Y. Wang, “Reconfiguration method to extract more power from partially shaded photovoltaic arrays with series-parallel topology,” J. Energies, Vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1439. doi:10.3390/en12081439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Patnaik, et al., “Reconfiguration strategy for optimization of solar photovoltaic array under non-uniform illumination conditions,” in 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Seattle, WA, 2011, pp. 001859–001864.
   Google Scholar
• M. Garcia, J.A. Vera, L. Marroyo, E. Lorenzo, and M. Pérez, “Solar-tracking PV plants in navarra: a 10 MW assessment,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl., Vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 337–346, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Malathy and R. Ramaprabha, “Reconfiguration strategies to extract maximum power from photovoltaic array under partially shaded conditions,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 81, no. Part 2, pp. 2922–2934, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• D. Yousri, T.S. Babu, E. Beshr, M.B. Eteiba, and D. Allam, “A Robust strategy based on marine predators algorithm for large scale photovoltaic array reconfiguration to mitigate the partial shading effect on the performance of PV system,” IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 112407–112426, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. Satpathy and R. Sharma, “Power and mismatch losses mitigation by a fixed electrical reconfiguration technique for partially shaded photovoltaic arrays,” Energy Convers. Manage., Vol. 192, pp. 52–70, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. I. Rani, G.S Ilango, and C. Nagamani, “Enhanced power generation from PV array under partial shading conditions by shade dispersion using Su Do Ku configuration,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 594–601,2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Vijayalekshmy, G.R Bindu, and I.S. Rama, “Performance improvement of partially shaded photovoltaic arrays under moving shadow conditions through shade dispersion,” J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. B, Vol. 97, pp. 569–575, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• S. G. Krishna and T. Moger, “Optimal sudoku reconfiguration technique for total-cross-tied PV array to increase power output under non-uniform irradiance,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., Vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1973–1984,2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Prince Winston, S. Kumaravel, B. Praveen Kumar, and S. Devakirubakaran, “Performance improvement of solar PV array topologies during various partial shading conditions,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 196, pp. 228–242, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. S. Sahu, et al., “Maximizing power output of partially shaded photovoltaic arrays using sudoku configuration,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power. Electron., Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–1, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. E. Iysaouy, M. Lahbabi, and A. Oumnad, “Enhancing the performances of PV array configurations under partially shaded conditions: a comparative study,” Int. J. Renew. Energy Res., Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1779–1790, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. Potnuru, D. Pattabiraman, S.I. Ganesan, and N. Chilakapati, “Positioning of PV panels for reduction in line losses and mismatch losses in PV array,” Renew. Energy, Vol. 78, pp. 264–275, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Horoufiany and R. Ghandehari, “Optimal fixed reconfiguration scheme for PV arrays power enhancement under mutual shading conditions,” IET Renew. Power Gener., Vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1456–1463, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wiles. Photovoltaic power systems and the national electrical code: suggested practices. March 2001 [Online] Available: http://www.nmsu.edu/ tdi/ pdf-resources/NEC.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• B. Dhana Lakshmi and N. Rajasekar, “Dominance square based array reconfiguration scheme for power loss reduction in solar photovoltaic (PV) systems,” Energy Convers. Manage., Vol. 156, pp. 84–102, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Rajani, and T. Ramesh, “Maximum power enhancement under partial shadings using modified Sudoku reconfiguration,” J. Power Energy Syst, 2020. doi:10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.01100.
   Google Scholar
• M. Horoufiany and R. Ghandehari, “Optimization of the Sudoku based reconfiguration technique for PV arrays power enhancement under mutual shading conditions,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 159, pp. 1037–1046, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. S. Pillai, J. Prasanth Ram, M. Siva Sai Nihanth, and N. Rajasekar, “A simple, sensorless and fixed reconfiguration scheme for maximum power enhancement in PV systems,” Energy Convers. Manage., Vol. 172, pp. 402–417, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Dhana Lakshmi and N. Rajasekar, “A novel competence square based PV array reconfiguration technique for solar PV maximum power extraction,” Energy Convers. Manage., Vol. 174, pp. 897–912, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. S. Babu, D. Yousri, and K. Balasubramanian, “Photovoltaic array reconfiguration system for maximizing the harvested power using population-based algorithms,” IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 109608–109624, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. Samikannu, R. Namani, and S.K. Subramaniam, “Power enhancement of partially shaded PV arrays through shade dispersion using magic square configuration,” J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 8, pp. 063503,2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sreekanth Reddy, et al., “A novel Magic-Square puzzle based one-time PV reconfiguration technique to mitigate mismatch power loss under various partial shading conditions,” Optic, Vol. 222, pp. 165289, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• G. Shreenivasa reddy, T. Bramhananda Reddy, and M. Vijaya Kumar, “Shadow dispersion of PV array under variable irradiance for superior power generation by Magic Square configuration,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., Vol. 7, no. 1.8, pp. 172–177, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• A. S. Yadav, R.K. Pachauri, Y.K. Chauhan, S. Choudhury, and R. Singh, “Performance enhancement of partially shaded PV array using novel shade dispersion effect on magic-square puzzle configuration,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 144, pp. 780–797, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. S. Yadav, R.K. Pachauri, and Y.K. Chauhan, “Comprehensive investigation of PV arrays with puzzle shade dispersion for improved performance,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 129, pp. 256–285, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. Satpathy, R. Sharma, and S. Dash, “An efficient SD-PAR technique for maximum power generation from modules of partially shaded PV arrays,” Energy, Vol. 175, pp. 182–194, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. Satpathy, R. Sharma, and S. Jena, “A shade dispersion interconnection scheme for partially shaded modules in a solar PV array network,” Energy, Vol. 139, no. C, pp. 350–365, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• S. Sreekanth Reddy, and C. Yammani, “Odd-even-prime pattern for PV array to increase power output under partial shading conditions,” Energy, Vol. 213, pp. 118780, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Yadav, B. Kumar, and D. Swaroop, “Mitigation of mismatch power losses of PV array under partial shading condition using novel odd even configuration,” Energy Rep., Vol. 6, pp. 427–437, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Nasiruddin, S. Khatoon, M.F. Jalil, and R.C. Bansal, “Shade diffusion of partial shaded PV array by using odd-even structure,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 181, pp. 519–529, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Vijayalekshmy, G.R. Bindu, and S. Rama Iyer, “A novel Zig-Zag scheme for power enhancement of partially shaded solar arrays,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 135, pp. 92–102, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Vijayalekshmy, et al., “Performance comparison of Zig-Zag and Su do Ku schemes in a partially shaded photo voltaic array under static shadow conditions,” in Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), Vellore, 2017, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• H. S. Sahu, S.K. Nayak, and S. Mishra, “Maximizing the power generation of a partially shaded PV array,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power. Electron., Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 626–637, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Krishna G, and T. Moger, “Static reconfiguration approach for photo-voltaic array to improve maximum power,” in International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ICE3), Gorakhpur, India, 2020, pp. 270–275.
   Google Scholar
• G. Meerimatha and B.L. Rao “Novel reconfiguration approach to reduce line losses of the photovoltaic array under various shading conditions,” Energy, Vol. 196, pp. 117120, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. G. Krishna and T. Moger, “Enhancement of maximum power output through reconfiguration techniques under non-uniform irradiance conditions,” Energy, Vol. 187, pp. 115917, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.S.S. Nihanth, J.P. Ram, D.S. Pillai, A.M.Y.M. Ghias, A. Garg, and N. Rajasekar, “Enhanced power production in PV arrays using a new skyscraper puzzle based one-time reconfiguration procedure under partial shade conditions (PSCs),” Sol. Energy, Vol. 194, pp. 209–224,2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. S. Babu, J.P. Ram, T. Dragicevic, M. Miyatake, F. Blaabjerg, and N. Rajasekar, “Particle swarm optimization based solar PV array reconfiguration of the maximum power extraction under partial shading conditions,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 74–85, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Velasco-Quesada, F. Guinjoan-Gispert, R. Pique-Lopez, M. Roman-Lumbreras, and A. Conesa-Roca, “Electrical PV array reconfiguration strategy for energy extraction improvement in grid-connected PV systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Elect., Vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 4319–4331, Nov. 2009. doi:10.1109/TIE.2009.2024664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tabanjat, et al., “Reconfiguration solution for shaded PV panels using switching control,” Renew. Energy, Vol. xxx, pp. 1e10, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• D. La Manna, V. Li Vigni, E. Riva Sanseverino, V. Di Dio, and P. Romano, “Reconfigurable electrical interconnection strategies for photovoltaic arrays: a review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 33, pp. 412–426, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Velasco-Quesada, F. Guinjoan-Gispert, R. Pique-Lopez, M. Roman-Lumbreras, and A. Conesa-Roca, “Electrical PV array reconfiguration strategy for energy extraction improvement in grid-connected PV systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 4319–4331, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Velasco, et al., “Grid-connected PV systems energy extraction improvement by means of an Electric Array Reconfiguration (EAR) strategy: operating principle and experimental results,” in IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Rhodes, 2008, pp. 1983–1988.
   Google Scholar
• J. P. Storey, P.R. Wilson, and D. Bagnall, “Improved optimization strategy for irradiance equalization in dynamic photovoltaic arrays,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2946–2956, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Velasco, et al., “Irradiance equalization method for output power optimization in plant-oriented grid-connected PV generators,” in European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Dresden, 2005, pp. 10.
   Google Scholar
• E. R. Sanseverino, T.N. Ngoc, M. Cardinale, V. Li Vigni, D. Musso, P. Romano, and F. Viola, “Dynamic programming and Munkres algorithm for optimal photovoltaic arrays reconfiguration,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 122, pp. 347–358, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Yu, et al., “An improved strategy for reconstruction of PV arrays based on irradiance equalization,” in 5th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering, Chengdu, China, 2020, pp. 1072–1079.
   Google Scholar
• D. Nguyen, and B. Lehman, “An adaptive solar photovoltaic array using model-based reconfiguration algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2644–2654, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Cheng, et al., “An adaptive solar photovoltaic array reconfiguration method based on fuzzy control,” in 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Jinan, 2010, pp. 176–181.
   Google Scholar
• M. Karakose, M. Baygin, K. Murat, N. Baygin, and E. Akin, “Fuzzy based reconfiguration method using intelligent partial shadow detection in PV arrays,” Int. J. Comp. Intell. Syst., Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 202–212, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Liu, et al., “Research on an adaptive solar photovoltaic array using shading degree model-based reconfiguration algorithm,” in Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Xuzhou, 2010, pp. 2356–2360.
   Google Scholar
• S. B. Dhale, S.B. Dhale, J.S. Mukherjee, T.S. Babu, and N. Rajasekar, “Solar PV array reconfiguration under partial shading conditions for maximum power extraction using genetic algorithm,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 43, pp. 102–110, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. González-Montoya, et al. Reconfiguration of photovoltaic arrays based on genetic algorithm. doi:10.17533/udea.redin.n75a10.
   Google Scholar
• N.A. Rajan, K.D. Shrikant, B. Dhanalakshmi, and N. Rajasekar, “Solar PV array reconfiguration using the concept of standard deviation and genetic algorithm,” Energy Proc., Vol. 117, pp. 1062, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• M. Karaköse, et al., “A new efficient reconfiguration approach based on genetic algorithm in PV systems,” in IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Istanbul, 2014, pp. 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• A. Harrag and S. Messalti, “Adaptive GA-based reconfiguration of photovoltaic array combating partial shading conditions,” Neural Comp. Appl., Vol. 30, pp. 1145–1170, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Singh and N. Pal, “Obstacles and comparative analysis in the advancement of photovoltaic power stations in India,” Sustain. Comp. Inform. Syst., Vol. 25, pp. 100372, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. B. Bodkhe, et al., “Photovoltaic module interconnection modified to improve efficiency robustness,” Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., Vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 15560–15563, 2017. ISSN 0973-4562
   Google Scholar
• Y. Auttawaitkul, et al., “A method of appropriate electrical array reconfiguration management for photovoltaic powered car,” in IEEE. APCCAS 1998. 1998 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems. Microelectronics and Integrating Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX242), Chiangmai, Thailand, 1998, pp. 201–204.
   Google Scholar