OF-FZ: An Optimized Objective Function for the Ipv6 Routing Protocol for LLNs

REFERENCES

• P. T. Ed Winter, “RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks,” Internet Eng. Task Force (IETF), Vol. 6550, pp. 1–157, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• E. P. Thubert, “Objective function zero for the routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks (RPL),” Internet Eng. Task Force (IETF), Vol. 6552, pp. 1–14, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• O. Gnawali, “The minimum rank with hysteresis objective function,” Internet Eng. Task Force (IETF), Vol. 6719, pp. 1–13, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• E. Ancillotti, R. Bruno, and M. Conti, “Reliable data delivery with the IETF routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1864–1877, August 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kharche, and S. Pawar, “Optimizing network lifetime and QoS in 6LoWPANs using deep neural networks,” Comput. Electr. Eng., Vol. 87, pp. 1–13, 2020. ISSN0045-7906. doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. O. Kamgueu, E. Nataf, and T. Djotio, “On design and deployment of fuzzy-based metric for routing in low-power and lossy networks,” in 2015 IEEE 40th Local Computer Networks Conference Workshops (LCN Workshops), pp. 789–795, 2015. doi:10.1109/LCNW.2015.7365929.
   Google Scholar
• H. Lamaazia, and N. Benamarb, “OF-EC: A novel energy consumption aware objective function for RPL based on fuzzy logic,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., Vol. 117, pp. 42–58, May 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Shreyas, S. Hemant, B. Jatin, P. Sanjay, N. N. Srinidhi, and M. Dilip, “Congestion aware algorithm using fuzzy logic to find an optimal routing path for IoT networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy (ICCIKE), Dubai, UAE, December 2019.
   Google Scholar
• K. Ines, B. Ines, and S. Abdelaziz, “A novel opportunistic fuzzy logic based objective function for the routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks,” in 15th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• S. Sanshi, and C. D. Jaidhar, “Fuzzy optimised routing metric with mobility support for RPL,” IET Commun., Vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1253–1261, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kumar, and N. Hariharan, “DCRL-RPL: Dual context-based routing and load balancing in RPL for IoT networks,” IET Commun., Vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1869–1882, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Farzaneh, M. Koosha, E. Boochanpour, and E. Alizadeh, “A new method for intrusion detection on RPL routing protocol using fuzzy logic,” in IEEE 6th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR), 2020.
   Google Scholar
• B. Safaei, “Amir mahdi hosseini monazzah, alireza ejlali, “ELITE: An elaborated cross-layer rpl objective function to achieve energy efficiency in internet of things devices”,” IEEE Internet Things J., Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1169–1182, July 2020. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2020.3011968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Gaddour, A. Koubâa, and M. Abid, “Quality-of-service aware routing for static and mobile IPv6-based low-power and lossy sensor networks using RPL,” Ad. Hoc. Netw., Vol. 33, pp. 233–256, 2015., ISSN 1570-8705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. K. Shahzad, “Tae Ho Cho “An energy-aware routing and filtering node (ERF) selection in CCEF to extend network lifetime in WSN”,” IETE. J. Res., Vol. 63, pp. 368–380, Feb 2017. Taylor & Francis.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. S. Mamdani, “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller,” Int. J. Man Mach. Stud., Vol. 7, pp. 1–13, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kuwelkar, and H. G. Virani, “Design of an efficient RPL objective function for internet of things applications,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (IJACSA), Vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 228–235, 2021. doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Raghu Vamsi, and K. Kant, “Trust and locationaware routing protocol for wireless sensor networks,” IETE. J. Res, Vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 634–644, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Contiki OS”. http://www.contiki-os.org/
   Google Scholar
• “ContikiRPL”. https://github.com/contiki-os/contiki/tree/master/core/
   Google Scholar
• A. Seyfollahi, and A. Ghaffari, “A lightweight load balancing and route minimizing solution for Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy networks,” Comput. Netw, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. De, A. Ray, and S. Mukherjee, “Ananga mohan Sen “Performance Analysis of different tree structures in heterogeneous Wireless sensor network”,” IETE. J. Res., Vol. 62, pp. 654–662, April 2016. Taylor & Francis.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kuwelkar, and H. G. Virani, “Performance analysis of the objective functions in IPv6 Routing Protocol for LLN’s used in IOT applications,” in 2019 IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon), Pune, India, 2019, pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/PuneCon46936.2019.9105896.
   Google Scholar
• I. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, “A survey on sensor networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag, Vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 102–114, 2002. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2002.1024422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar