Efficiency Analysis of Cryptographic Algorithms for Image Data Security in Cloud Environment

REFERENCES

• O. Arasaratnam, “Introduction to cloud computing,” Audit. Cloud Comput. A Secur. Priv. Guid., 1–13, 2011. doi:10.1002/9781118269091.ch1.
   Google Scholar
• R. Barga, D. Gannon, and D. Reed, “The client and the cloud: democratizing research computing,” IEEE Internet Comput., Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 72–75, 2011. doi:10.1109/MIC.2011.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. Bello, et al., “Cloud computing in construction industry: use cases, benefits and challenges,” Autom. Constr., Vol. 122, pp. 103441–103458, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Kristiani, C. T. Yang, Y. T. Wang, and C. Y. Huang, “Implementation of an edge computing architecture using openstack and kubernetes,” Lect. Notes Electr. Eng., Vol. 514, pp. 675–685, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1056-0_66.
   Google Scholar
• P. Modisane, O. Jokonya, and P. Modisane, “ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Evaluating the benefits of cloud computing in small, Medium and Evaluating the benefits of cloud computing in small, Medium and Enterprises (SMMEs) Enterprises (SMMEs),” Procedia Comput. Sci., Vol. 181, no. 2019, pp. 784–792, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.231.
   Google Scholar
• D. Kr, V. Kr, and M. C. Trivedi, “Materials today: Proceedings encryption algorithm in cloud computing,” Mater. Today Proc., Vol. 37, pp. 1869–1875, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.452.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bhardwaj, G. V. B. Subrahmanyam, V. Avasthi, and H. Sastry, “Security algorithms for cloud computing,” Procedia Comput. Sci., Vol. 85, no. Cms, pp. 535–542, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.215.
   Google Scholar
• S. S. Ghosh, H. Parmar, P. Shah, and K. Samdani, “A Comprehensive analysis between popular symmetric encryption algorithms,” 1st Int. Conf. Data Sci. Anal. PuneCon 2018 Proc., 1–7, 2018. doi:10.1109/PUNECON.2018.8745324.
   Google Scholar
• M. Panda, “Image encryption using symmetric key algorithms on different platforms,” International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering and Research, Vol. 4, pp. 518–524, 2018. doi:10.23883/IJRTER.2018.4268.FZ1LK.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kansal, and M. Mittal, “Performance evaluation of various symmetric encryption algorithms,” Proc. 2014 3rd Int. Conf. Parallel Distrib. Grid Comput. PDGC 2014, no. January, pp. 105–109, 2015. doi:10.1109/PDGC.2014.7030724.
   Google Scholar
• P. Patil, P. Narayankar, D. G. Narayan, and S. M. Meena, “A Comprehensive evaluation of cryptographic algorithms: DES, 3DES, AES, RSA and blowfish,” Procedia Comput. Sci., Vol. 78, no. December 2015, pp. 617–624, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.02.108.
   Google Scholar
• J. Raigoza, and K. Jituri, “Evaluating performance of Symmetric Encryption algorithms,” Proc. 2016 Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Comput. Intell. CSCI 2016, 1378–1379, 2017. doi:10.1109/CSCI.2016.0258.
   Google Scholar
• P. Semwal, and M. K. Sharma, “Comparative study of different cryptographic algorithms for data security in cloud computing,” Proc. 2017 3rd Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Autom. (Fall), ICACCA 2017, Vol. 2018-Jan, pp. 1–7, 2018. doi:10.1109/ICACCAF.2017.8344738.
   Google Scholar
• R. Agrawal, and K. Ahuja, “CSIS: compressed sensing-based enhanced-embedding capacity image steganography scheme,” IET. Image. Process., Vol. 15, pp. 1909–1925, 2021. doi:10.1049/ipr2.12161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wang, “Data encryption algorithms,” Comput. Netw. Secur., pp. 39–87, 2009. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79698-5_2.
   Google Scholar
• B. Shahid, H. Tauqeer, and M. S. Ilyas, “Hardware implementation of DES encryption cracker,” 2005 Student Conf. Eng. Sci. Technol. SCONEST, 1–4, 2005. doi:10.1109/SCONEST.2005.4382874.
   Google Scholar
• W. Zibideh, and M. M. Matalgah, “Modified-DES encryption algorithm with improved error performance and enhanced security in wireless fading channels,” Security and Communication Networks, Vol. 8, no. September 2015, pp. 565–573, 2011. doi:10.1109/RWS.2011.5725509.
   Google Scholar
• D. Coppersmith, D. B. Johnson, and S. M. Matyas, “A proposed mode for triple-DES encryption,” IBM J. Res. Dev., Vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 253–262, 1996. doi:10.1147/rd.402.0253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kclscy, and D. Wagner, “Key-schedule cryptanalysis of I D E A, G-DES,” Advances in Cryptology — CRYPTO ’96, pp. 237–251, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kumari, S. Gupta, and P. Sardana, “A survey of image encryption algorithms,” 3D Res., Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–35, 2017. doi:10.1007/s13319-017-0148-5.
   Google Scholar
• S. Heron, “Advanced Encryption Standard (AES),” Netw. Secur., Vol. 2009, no. 12, pp. 8–12, 2009. doi:10.1016/S1353-4858(10)70006-4.
   Google Scholar
• C. Riman, and P. E. Abi-Char, “Comparative analysis of block cipher-based encryption algorithms: a survey,” Comput. Fraud., Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2015. doi:10.12691/iscf-3-1-1.
   Google Scholar
• C. P. Oewanganl, and A. K. Mandae, “Study of avalanche effect in AES using binary codes,” 2012 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT), Vol. 978, pp. 183–187, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• D. Gstir, and M. Schläffer, “Fast software encryption attacks on AES,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (Including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinf., Vol. 7918, no. LNCS, pp. 359–374, 2013. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38553-7_21.
   Google Scholar
• E. Biham, O. Dunkelman, and N. Keller, “Related-key boomerang and rectangle attacks,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., Vol. 3494, pp. 507–525, 2005. doi:10.1007/11426639_30.
   Google Scholar
• A. Kaminsky, M. Kurdziel, and S. Radziszowski, “An overview of cryptanalysis research for the advanced encryption standard,” Proc. IEEE Mil. Commun. Conf. MILCOM, pp. 1310–1316, 2010. doi:10.1109/MILCOM.2010.5680130.
   Google Scholar
• T. Nie, and T. Zhang, “A study of DES and blowfish encryption algorithm,” IEEE Reg. 10 Annu. Int. Conf. Proc./TENCON, pp. 1–4, 2009. doi:10.1109/TENCON.2009.5396115.
   Google Scholar
• J. S. Bhalla, and P. Nagrath, “Nested digital image watermarking technique using Blowfish encryption algorithm,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• A. Alabaichi, F. Ahmad, and R. Mahmod, “Security analysis of blowfish algorithm,” 2013 2nd Int. Conf. Inf. Appl. ICIA 2013, pp. 12–18, 2013. doi:10.1109/ICoIA.2013.6650222.
   Google Scholar
• S. Fluhrer, I. Mantin, and A. Shamir, “Weaknesses in the key scheduling algorithm of RC4 Selected areas in cryptography,” Springer, Vol. 2259, pp. 1–24, 2001. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-45537-X_1%0A. doi:10.1007/3-540-45537-X_1.
   Google Scholar
• F. Thabit, P. S. Alhomdy, and P. S. Jagtap, “Security analysis and performance evaluation of a new lightweight cryptographic algorithm for cloud computing environment,” Glob. Transitions Proc., Vol. 2, pp. 100–110, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.gltp.2021.01.014.
   Google Scholar
• A. Klein, “Attacks on the RC4 stream cipher,” Des. Codes Cryptogr., Vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 269–286, 2008. doi:10.1007/s10623-008-9206-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sen Gupta, S. Maitra, G. Paul, and S. Sarkar, “(Non-)random sequences from (Non-)random permutations - analysis of RC4 stream cipher,” J. Cryptol., Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 67–108, 2014. doi:10.1007/s00145-012-9138-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Jindal, and B. Singh, “RC4 encryption - A literature survey,” Procedia Comput. Sci., Vol. 46, no. Icict 2014, pp. 697–705, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.02.129.
   Google Scholar
• T. S. Obaid, “Study a public key in RSA algorithm,” Eur. J. Eng. Res. Sci., Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 395–398, 2020. doi:10.24018/ejers.2020.5.4.1843.
   Google Scholar
• V. C. Osamor, and I. B. Edosomwan, “Employing scrambled alpha-numeric randomization and RSA algorithm to ensure enhanced encryption in electronic medical records,” Inf. Med. Unlocked, Vol. 25, pp. 100672–100678, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.imu.2021.100672.
   Google Scholar
• X. Zhou, and X. Tang, “Research and implementation of RSA algorithm for encryption and decryption,” Proc. 6th Int. Forum Strateg. Technol. IFOST 2011, Vol. 2, pp. 1118–1121, 2011. doi:10.1109/IFOST.2011.6021216.
   Google Scholar