Framework for Identification of Critical Factors for Open Source Software Adoption Decision in Mission-Critical IT Infrastructure Services

REFERENCES

• D. Nagy, A. M. Yassin, and A. Bhattacherjee, “Organizational adoption of open source software: barriers and remedies,” Commun. ACM, Vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 148–51, Mar. 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Bundit, “Open Source Software (OSS) adoption in commercial firms: A literature review,” KMITL Inf. Technol. J., Vol. 4, no. 1, Jul. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• D. Petrov, and N. Obwegeser. “Adoption Barriers of Open-Source Software: A Systematic Review,” Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3138085, Mar. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• M. G. Yaseen, and M. Bahari, “A theoretical research Framework of Open Source Software adoption in Malaysian University Information and Communications Technology centers,” J.Inf. Syst. Res. Innov., Vol. 8, pp. 75–82, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• O. N. P. Toro, Y. A. Correa, A. Valencia-Arias, and M. Benjumea-Arias, “A billiometric analysis of the use of OSS in deucational contexts,” Prob. Educ. 21st Century, Vol. 78, no. 1, pp. Continuous, 2020. DOI:10.33225/pec/20.78.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. E. Ponta, H. Plate, and A. Sabetta, “Detection, assessment and mitigation of vulnerabilities in open source dependencies,” Empir Softw. Eng, Vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 3175–215, Sep. 2020. DOI:10.1007/s10664-020-09830-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Di Ruscio, and P. Pelliccione, “Simulating upgrades of complex systems: The case of Free and Open Source software,” Inf. Softw. Technol., Vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 438–62, Apr. 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. August, W. Chen, and K. Zhu, “Competition Among proprietary and open-source software firms: The role of licensing in Strategic contribution,” Manage. Sci., Vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 3041–66, May 2021. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Marsan, G. Paré, and A. Beaudry, “Adoption of open source software in organizations: A socio-cognitive perspective,” The J. Strategic Inf. Syst., Vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 257–73, Dec. 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Medhat, R. A. Ramadan, and I. Talkhan. Multimedia Services and Applications in Mission Critical Communication Systems. IGI Global, pp. 270–291, 2017, http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2113-6.ch012.
   Google Scholar
• L. Ramanathan, and S. Krishnan, “An empirical investigation into the adoption of open source software in Information Technology outsourcing organizations,” J Syst. Inf. Technol., Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 167–92, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• J. Baker, “The technology–Organization–Environment framework: Explaining and predicting Our Digital society,” in In. Syst. Theory, Vol. 1, 1 vols, Springer, New York, NY. pp. 231–45, 2012. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12.
   Google Scholar
• U. Laila, and S. F. A. Bukhari, “Open Source Software (OSS) adoption framework for local Environment and its comparison,” Innovations Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng., Springer, Dordrecht, 13–16, 2010. DOI:10.1007/978-90-481-9112-3_3.
   Google Scholar
• M. Zahedi, M. Ali Babar, and C. Treude, “An Empirical study of security issues posted in Open Source projects,” in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 5504–13, Jan. 2018. DOI:10.24251/HICSS.2018.686.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Roumani, J. K. Nwankpa, and Y. F. Roumani, “‘Adopters’ trust in enterprise open source vendors: An empirical examination,” J. Syst. Softw., Vol. 125, pp. 256–70, Mar. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Zhu, K. L. Kraemer, and S. Xu, “The process of Innovation assimilation by Firms in different countries: A Technology diffusion Perspective on E-business,” Manage. Sci., Vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1557–76, Oct. 2006. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. M. Gichira, A. M. Kahonge, and E. K. Miriti, “Adoption of Open Source Software by organizations – A framework for Kenya,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., Vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 25–32, Dec. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• N. Carter, D. Bryant-Lukosius, A. DiCenso, J. Blythe, and A. J. Neville, “The use of triangulation in qualitative research,” Oncol. Nurs. Forum, Vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 545–7, Sep. 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Laila, and K. Mehboob, “Comparison of open source maturity models,” Procedia. Comput. Sci., Vol. 111, pp. 348–54, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• “Synopsis: Open Source Security and Risk Analysis,” Network Security, Vol. 2018, no. 6, p. 3, Jun. 2018. DOI:10.1016/S1353-4858(18)30051-5.
   Google Scholar
• C. M. Schweik, and R. C. English. Internet success: a study of open-source software commons. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. Int. J. Commons, Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 577–578. DOI:10.18352/ijc.434.
   Google Scholar
• Ø Hauge, C. Ayala, and R. Conradi, “Adoption of Open Source Software in software-intensive organizations - A Systematic Literature review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., Vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1133–54, Nov. 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Kalaote, and S. Mutula, “Open source software deployment in the public sector: A review of Botswana and South Africa,” Libr. Hi Tech, Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 63–80, Mar. 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Gurusamy, and J. Campbell. A case study of Open Source software adoption in Australian public sector organizations. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• K. Champion, and B. M. Hill. “Underproduction: An Approach for Measuring Risk in Open Source Software,” presented at the International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), Honolulu, HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• X. Franch, R. Kenett, F. Mancinelli, A. Susi, D. Ameller, M. C. Annosi, R. Ben-Jacob, Y. Blumenfeld, O. H. Franco, D. Gross, L. Lopez, M. Morandini, M. Oriol, A. Siena. “The RISCOSS platform for risk management in Open Source Software adoption,” In Open Source Syst.: Adoption Impact, pp. 124–33, 2015. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-17837-0-12.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sarrab, and O. M. H. Rehman, “Empirical study of open source software selection for adoption, based on software quality characteristics,” Adv. Eng. Softw., Vol. 69, pp. 1–11, Mar. 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. R. Sánchez, P. N. Ayuso, J. A. Galindo, and D. Benavides, “Open Source adoption factors—A Systematic Literature review,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 8, pp. 94594–609, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• T. A. Alrawashdeh, M. W. Elbes, A. Almomani, F. ElQirem, and A. Tamimi, “User acceptance model of open source software: an integrated model of OSS characteristics and UTAUT,” J Ambient Intell Human Comput, Vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 3315–27, Aug. 2020. DOI:10.1007/s12652-019-01524-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Petrov, and N. Obwegeser. “Barriers to Open-Source Software Adoption: Review and Synthesis,” International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD), Oct. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• T. P. Scanlon, “Critical factors for Open Source Advancement in the U.S. Department of defense,” IEEE Softw., Vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 29–33, Nov. 2019. DOI:10.1109/MS.2019.2933769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Glynn, B. Fitzgerald, and C. Exton, “Commercial adoption of open source software: an empirical study," International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Nov. 2005 , pp. 10.
   Google Scholar
• A. W. Khan, I. Hussain, and M. Zamir, “Analytic hierarchy process-based prioritization framework for vendor’s reliability challenges in global software development,” J. Software Evol. Process, Vol. 33, no. 3, pp. e2310, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. U. Khan, and A. W. Khan, “Critical challenges in managing offshore software development outsourcing contract from vendors’ perspectives,” IET Software, Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Feb. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Silic, and A. Back, “Open Source Software adoption: Lessons from Linux in Munich,” IT. Prof., Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 44–7, Feb. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Raymond, P. Poba-Nzaou, and B. Fabi, “Risk of adopting mission-critical OSS applications: an interpretive case study,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., Vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 477–512, Apr. 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Katsamakas, and M. Xin, “Open source adoption strategy,” Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., Vol. 36, pp. 100872, Jul. 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Shaikh, “Negotiating open source software adoption in the UK public sector,” Gov. Inf. Q., Vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 115–32, Jan. 2016. DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Jin, S. Verma, and W. H. Chuang, “Deploying mission critical learning management system using Open Source Software," Proceedings of the 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, Washington, August 2012.
   Google Scholar
• N. Benkeltoum, “Open source software adoption for safety-critical information systems design: the Thales case study,” Systemes d’information Management, Vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 71–98, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• S. Al Zeheimi, and A. Zeki. ‘Perceptions of library and information science community towards open source software adoption in libraries of Oman’, in The 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for The Muslim World (ICT4M), Kuching, 2014, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Jusoh, K. Chamili, J. H. Yahaya, and N. C. Pa, “The selection criteria of open source software adoption in Malaysia,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Technol., Vol. 4, no. 21, pp. 278–87, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• U. Laila, and A. Abbas. “Mathematical Model of Open Source Software Adoption in Pakistan,” presented at the International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST), Lahore Pakistan, Dec. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• K. Zhu, K. L. Kraemer, V. Gurbaxani, and S. X. Xu, “Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency,” MIS. Q., Vol. 30, pp. 515–39, 2006. DOI:10.2307/25148771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Kitchenham, and P. Brereton, “A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering,” Inf. Softw. Technol., Vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 2049–75, Dec. 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Brocke, et al. “Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings, Jan. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• J. S. Norris, and P.-H. Kamp, “Mission-Critical development with Open Source Software: Lessons learned,” IEEE Softw., Vol. 21, pp. 42–9, Jan. 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Poba-nzaou, and S. Uwizeyemungu. “Barriers to Mission-Critical Open Source Software Adoption by Organizations: A Provider Perspective,” presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ivarsson, and T. Gorschek, “A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations,” Empir Software Eng, Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 365–95, Jun. 2011. DOI:10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Noroozi, and H. Seifzadeh. “Proposing Novel Measures to Alleviate the Risks of Migration to Open Source Software,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, New York, NY, USA, 2018, pp. 134–9.
   Google Scholar
• M. Silic, and A. Back. “Identification and Importance of the Technological Risks of Open Source Software in the Enterprise Adoption Context,” in International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Osnabrück, Mar. 2015, pp. 1163–76.
   Google Scholar
• K. Crowston, F. Deltour, and N. Jullien. “Open Source Software Adoption: A Technological Innovation Perspective,” presented at the ternational Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Rochester, NY, Apr. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• B. Buffett. “Factors influencing open source software adoption in public sector national and international statistical organisations,” presented at the Meeting on the Management of Statistical Information Systems (MSIS), Dublin, Ireland and Manila, Philippines, Apr. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• H. Safadi, D. Chan, M. Dawes, M. Roper, and S. Faraj, “Open-source health information technology: A case study of electronic medical records,” Health. Policy. Technol., Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–28, Mar. 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Poba-Nzaou, J. Marsan, G. Paré, and L. Raymond, “Open Source as an alternative for clinical Information Systems adoption," Health Informatics & Technology Conference, Oct 2014.
   Google Scholar
• B. Haj Frej, C. Bach, R. Shock, and E. Desplaines. “Open-source Software: Adoption and Challenges,” presented at the Northeast Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Apr. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• D. Silic, A. Back, and M. Silic, “Taxonomy of technological risks of open source software in the enterprise adoption context,” Info Comput. Secur., Vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 570–83, Nov. 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Munoz-Cornejo, C. B. Seaman, and A. G. Koru, “An Empirical Investigation into the adoption of Open Source Software in hospitals,” Developments Healthcare Inf. Syst. Technol.: Models Methods, Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 16–237, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• R. Batra, and A. Singh Pall, “Adoption and assessment of hospital Information systems: A study of hospitals in jalandhar,” Asia-Pacific J. Manage. Res. Innov., Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 205–218, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• D. Tosi, L. Lavazza, S. Morasca, and M. Chiappa. “Surveying the Adoption of FLOSS by Public Administration Local Organizations,” in Open Source Systems: Adoption and Impact, Cham, 2015, pp. 114–23.
   Google Scholar
• H. Ishijima, M. Mapunda, M. Mndeme, F. Sukums, and V. S. Mlay, “Challenges and opportunities for effective adoption of HRH information systems in developing countries: national rollout of HRHIS and TIIS in Tanzania,” Hum. Resour. Health., Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 48, Jun. 2015. DOI:10.1186/s12960-015-0043-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• T. Wiedemann, “Next generation simulation environments founded on open source software and XML-based standard interfaces,” in Proc. Winter Simul. Conf., Vol. 1, pp. 623–8, Dec. 2002. vol.1. DOI:10.1109/WSC.2002.1172939.
   Google Scholar
• J. Pyle. An Investigation of attitudes regarding the adoption of Free Open Source Software in the NHS. England: The University of Leeds, School of Medicine, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• H. Schmuhl, O. Heinze, and B. Bergh, “Use of Open Source Software in Health care delivery - results of a qualitative field study. Contribution of the EFMI LIFOSS working group,” Yearb. Med. Inform., Vol. 8, pp. 107–13, 2013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• V. Kuechler, C. Jensen, and D. Bryant. “Misconceptions and Barriers to Adoption of FOSS in the U.S. Energy Industry,” in Open Source Software: Quality Verification, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 232–44.
   Google Scholar
• F. Kramer, T. Rehn, M. Schneider, and K. Turowski. “ERP-Adoption Within SME—Challenging the Existing Body of Knowledge with a Recent Case,” in Multidimensional Views on Enterprise Information Systems, Cham, 2016, pp. 41–54. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-27043-2_4.
   Google Scholar
• E. Asare, L. Wang, and X. Fang, “Conformance checking: Workflow of hospitals and Workflow of open-source EMRs,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 8, pp. 139546–66, 2020. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. K. Kwan, and J. West. “A Conceptual Model for Enterprise Adoption of Open Source Software,” in The Standards Edge: Open Season, Sheridan Books, 2005, pp. 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• R. Sobhani, H. Seifzadeh, and T. J. Gandomani, “A review of Migration processes to Open Source software,” International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes (IJOSSP), Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 20–31, Jan. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• T. S. Almigheerbi, “An Empirical analysis of critical Success factors for CD-ERP model,” JCP, Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 37–47, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• F. Angermeir, M. Voggenreiter, F. Moyón, and D. Mendez. “Enterprise-Driven Open Source Software: A Case Study on Security Automation,” arXiv:2102.05500 [cs], Feb. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• K. D. Simon, “The value of open standards and open-source software in government environments,” IBM Syst. J., Vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 227–38, 2005. DOI:10.1147/sj.442.0227.
   Google Scholar
• M. L. M. Kiah, A. Haiqi, B. B. Zaidan, and A. A. Zaidan, “Open source EMR software: profiling, insights and hands-on analysis,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., Vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 360–82, Nov. 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Russo, G. Succi, and B. Rossi, “Adoption of free/libre open source software in public organizations: factors of impact,” Info Technol. People, Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 156–87, Jun. 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Jokonya. “Investigating Open Source Software Benefits in Public Sector,” in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan. 2015, pp. 2242–51.
   Google Scholar
• V. Dilmurad, E. Kerem, Ç Murat, and S. B. Sami, “Open source software usage on municipalities; a case study: Çankaya municipality,” Procedia. Comput. Sci., Vol. 3, pp. 805–8, Jan. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• K. S. Reddy, and K. Vipin, “OpenNoC: An open-source NoC infrastructure for FPGA-based hardware acceleration,” IEEE Embedded Sys. Lett., Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 123–6, Dec. 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Katsamakas, B. Janamanchi, W. Raghupathi, and W. Gao, “A classification analysis of the Success of Open source Health Information Technology projects,” IJHISI, Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 19–36, Oct. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• C. J. Reynolds, and J. C. Wyatt, “Open Source, Open standards, and Health care Information systems,” J. Med. Internet Res., Vol. 13, no. 1, Feb. 2011. DOI:10.2196/jmir.1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. P. Kasaine, “Organizational determinants in adoption of Open Source Software (OSS) in institutions of higher learning: A case of innorero university, Kenya,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Innovative Technol., Vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 37, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• G. Paré, M. D. Wybo, and C. Delannoy, “Barriers to open source software adoption in quebec’s health care organizations,” J. Med. Syst., Vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Feb. 2009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. R. Vest, and J. H. Stephens, “The use and role of open source software applications in public and not-for-profit hospitals in the United States,” Health Care Manage. Rev., Vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 361–70, Dec. 2013. DOI:10.1097/HMR.0b013e318276f9ed.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Poba-Nzaou, and S. Uwizeyemungu, “Critical barriers to Business Intelligence Open Source software adoption,” International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Q. Cao, J. Baker, J. Wetherbe, and V. Gu. “Organizational Adoption of Innovation: Identifying Factors that Influence RFID Adoption in the Healthcare Industry,” European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), May 2012.
   Google Scholar
• A. Van Loon, and D. Toshkov, “Adopting open source software in public administration: The importance of boundary spanners and political commitment,” Gov. Inf. Q., Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 207–15, Apr. 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Fernandez, Z. Zainol, and H. Ahmad, “The impacts of ERP systems on public sector organizations,” Procedia. Comput. Sci., Vol. 111, pp. 31–6, Jan. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ø Hauge, D. S. Cruzes, R. Conradi, K. S. Velle, and T. A. Skarpenes, “Risks and risk mitigation in Open Source Software adoption: bridging the Gap between literature and practice,"  Open Source Software: New Horizons. OSS 2010. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 319. Berlin: Springer, 2010, pp. 105–18.
   Google Scholar
• T. Correia, I. Pedrosa, and C. J. Costa, “‘Open Source Software in financial Auditing’, in Organizational Auditing and assurance in the Digital Age,” IGI Global, 188–202, 2019. DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-7356-2.ch010.
   Google Scholar
• W. G. Qu, Z. Yang, and Z. Wang, “Multi-level framework of open source software adoption,” J. Bus. Res., Vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 997–1003, Sep. 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Marsan, and G. Paré, “Antecedents of open source software adoption in health care organizations: A qualitative survey of experts in Canada,” Int. J. Med. Inf., Vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 731–41, Aug. 2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hussain, H. U. Khan, A. U. Khan, and S. U. Khan, “Prioritizing the issues extracted for getting Right people on Right Project in software Project management from vendors’ perspective,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 9, pp. 8718–32, 2021. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Wang, W. Zhang, J. Jiang, and L. Li. “A Reliability Automatic Assessment Framework of Open Source Software Based on JIRA,” in Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications, Langkawi, Malaysia, Feb. 2020, pp. 188–93.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Zhao, R. Liang, X. Chen, and J. Zou, “Evaluation indicators for open-source software: a review,” Cybersecurity, Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 20, Jun. 2021. DOI:10.1186/s42400-021-00084-8.
   Google Scholar
• F. Khan, A. W. Khan, S. Khan, I. Qasim, and A. Habib, “A secure core-assisted multicast routing protocol in mobile Ad-Hoc network,” J. Internet Technol., Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 375–383, Mar. 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Laila, N. Ahmed Khan, and A. Arfeen, “Trends of Open Source Software in mission-critical IT services infrastructures adoption in local environment,” J. Mech. Continua Math. Sci., Accepted, Vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 706–26, Aug. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• L. J. Cronbach, “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests,” Psychometrika, Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–334, Sep. 1951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Armitage, G. Berry, and J. N. S. Matthews. Statistical Methods in Medical research. 4 ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• N. A. C. Cressie, L. J. Sheffield, and H. J. Whitford, “Use of the one sample t-test in the real world,” J. Chronic. Dis., Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 107–14, Jan. 1984.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. O. Alassafi, A. Alharthi, R. J. Walters, and G. B. Wills, “A framework for critical security factors that influence the decision of cloud adoption by Saudi government agencies,” Telemat. Inform., Vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 996–1010, Nov. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar