A Stateless Spatial IPv6 Address Configuration Scheme for Internet of Things

References

• “Internet of Things (IoT) connected devices installed base worldwide from 2015 to 2025 (in billions),” 2018. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide
   Google Scholar
• “The Internet of Things is here and growing exponentially,” IHS Markit, 2017. Available: https://cdn.ihs.com/www/pdf/IoT_ebook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, “Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural lements, and future directions,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., Vol. 29, pp. 1645–60, Sep. 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Sethi and S. R. Sarangi, “Internet of Things: Architectures, protocols, and applications,” J. Electr. Comput. Eng., Vol. 2017, Jan. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Triantafyllou, P. Sarigiannidis, and T. Lagkas, “Network protocols, schemes, and mechanisms for Internet of Things (IoT): Features, open challenges, and trends,” Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., Vol. 2018, Article ID 5349894, 24 pages, Sep. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• E. Ahmed, A. Gani, and I. Hashem, “Internet of things architecture: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open challenges,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Mag., Vol. 24, pp. 10–16, Jun. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. A. Kassab and K. A. Darabkh, “A–Z survey of Internet of Things: Architectures, protocols, applications, recent advances, future directions and recommendations,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., Vol. 163, p. 102663, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. T. Dang, N. Krommenacker, P. Charpentier, and D. S. Kim, “The Internet of Things for logistics: Perspectives, application review, and challenges,” IETE Tech. Rev. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/02564602.2020.1827308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wang, M. K. Lim, C. Wang, and M. L. Tseng, “The evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT) over the past 20 years,” Comput. Ind. Eng., Vol. 155, p. 107174, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Weyrich and C. Ebert, “Reference architectures for the internet of things,” IEEE Softw., Vol. 33, pp. 112–16, Dec. 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Whitmore, A. Agarwal, and L. D. Xu, “The internet of things—A survey of topics and trends,” Inf. Syst. Front., Vol. 17, pp. 261–74, Apr. 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. L. Shah and H. F. Bhat, “Towards a Secure IPv6 autoconfiguration,” Inf. Secur. J. Glob. Perspect., Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 14–29, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/19393555.2020.1716117
   Google Scholar
• A. Anjaiah, A. Govardhan, and M. Vazralu, “Internet of Things: Present state of the art, applications, protocols and enabling technologies,” in Soft Computing and Signal Processing, Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 389–98.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kumar and P. Tomar, “A survey of IPv6 addressing schemes for Internet of things,” Int. J. Hyperconnectivity Internet Things, Vol. 2, pp. 43–57, Jul. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• D. Evans, “The Internet of Things how the next evolution of the Internet is changing everything,” Cisco Systems, 2011. Available: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoT_IBSG_0411FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• T. Savolainen, J. Soininen, and B. Silverajan, “IPv6 addressing strategies for IoT,” IEEE Sensors J., Vol. 13, pp. 3511–19, Oct. 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Hinden and S. Deering, “IP version 6 addressing architecture,” Network Working Group, RFC 4291, Feb. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• S. Thomson, T. Narten, and T. Jinmei, “IPv6 stateless address auto configuration,” Network Working Group, RFC 4862, Sep. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• W. George and T. W. Cable, “Enhanced duplicate address detection,” IETF, RFC 7527, Apr. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• F. Gont, “A method for generating semantically opaque interface identifiers with IPv6 stateless address auto configuration (SLAAC),” IETF, RFC 7217, Apr. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• F. Gont, A. Cooper, D. Thaler, and W. Liu, “Recommendation on stable IPv6 interface identifiers,” IETF, RFC 8064, Feb. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• G. Mao, B. Fidan, and B. D. O. Anderson, “Wireless sensor network localization techniques,” Comput. Netw., Vol. 51, pp. 2529–53, Jul. 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Patwari, J. N. Ash, S. Kyperountas, A. O. Hero, R. L. Moses, and N. S. Correal, “Locating the nodes: Cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., Vol. 22, pp. 54–69, Jun. 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Guerrero, J. Alvarez, and L. Rivero, “3D-ADAL: A three dimensional distributed range-free localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks based on unmanned aerial vehicles,” in 5th International Conference on Digital Information Management, Thunder Bay. IEEE, Jul. 2010, pp. 332–8.
   Google Scholar
• A. Dunkels, T. Voigt, and J. Alonso, “Making TCP/IP viable for wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN’04), Work-in-Progress Session, Berlin, Germany, Jan. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• R. I. Chang, C. H. Chang, and C. C. Chuang, “Scan-line IP assignment for wireless sensor networks,” in 5th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Sep. 2009, Vol. 24, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• R. I. Chang and C. C. Chuang, “A new spatial IP assignment method for IP-based wireless sensor networks,” Pers. Ubiquitous. Comput., Vol. 16, pp. 913–28, Oct. 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Cheng, C. Chuang, and R. Chang, “Three-dimensional location-based IPv6 addressing for wireless sensor networks in smart grid,” in Proc. IEEE 26th Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Netw. Appl., Mar. 2012, pp. 824–31.
   Google Scholar
• X. Wang, Y. Yang, Y. Yao, and H. Cheng, “An address configuration protocol for 6LoWPAN wireless sensor networks based on PDAD,” Comput. Stand. Interfaces, Vol. 36, pp. 918–27, Nov. 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. N. Hussein, R. Abdulla, T. O’Daniel, and M. Abbas, “Advanced location-based IPv6 address for the node of wireless sensor network,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., Vol. 10, pp. 2474–83, Jun. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• T. O’Daniel, M. N. Hussein, and R. Abdulla, “Location determination using tesselated addresses in IPv6 Wireless sensor networks,” Adv. Sci. Lett., Vol. 24, pp. 1723–6, Mar. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• S. Thomson and T. Narten, “IPv6 stateless address auto-configuration,” IETF, RFC 4862, Sep. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• A. Dunkels, T. Voigt, N. Bergman, and M. Jönsson, “The design and implementation of an IP-based sensor network for intrusion monitoring,” Swedish National Computer Networking Workshop, Karlstad, Sweden, Nov. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• S. Hyojeong, E. Talipov, and C. Hojung, “IPv6 lightweight stateless address autoconfiguration for 6LoWPAN using color coordinators,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Pervas. Comput. Commun., 2009, pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• X. Wang and D. Gao, “Research on IPv6 addressconfiguration for wireless sensor networks,” Int. J. Netw. Manag., Vol. 20, pp. 419–32, Nov. 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Cheng, C. C. Chuang, and R. I. Chang, “Lightweight spatial IP address configuration for IPv6-based wireless sensor networks in smart grid,” in SENSORS. IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• W. Xiaonan and Z. Shan, “An IPv6 address configuration scheme for wireless sensor networks based on location information,” Telecommun. Syst., Vol. 52, pp. 151–60, Jan. 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Chakraborty and N. Chaki, “An IPv6 based hierarchical address configuration scheme for smart grid,” in Applications and Innovations in Mobile Computing (AIMoC). IEEE, 2015, pp. 109–16.
   Google Scholar
• M. M. Kassem, H. S. Hamza, and I. A. Saroit, “A clock skew addressing scheme for Internet of Things,” in PIMRC, 2015, pp. 1553–7.
   Google Scholar
• X. Wang, D. Le, and H. Cheng, “Location-based ipv6 address configuration for vehicular networks,” J. Netw. Syst. Manage., Vol. 24, pp. 257–84, Apr. 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mavani and K. Asawa, “Privacy enabled disjoint and dynamic address auto-configuration protocol for 6Lowpan,” Ad. Hoc. Netw., Vol. 79, pp. 72–86, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wang, D. Le, and H. Cheng, “Hierarchical addressing scheme for 6LoWPAN WSN,” Wireless Netw., Vol. 24, pp. 1119–37, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11276-016-1394-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. K. Mishra, N. Chaki, and S. Choudhury, “An addressing scheme for massive sensor networks,” in IFIP International Conference on Computer information Systems and Industrial management. Cham: Springer, 2019, pp. 481–92.
   Google Scholar
• S. A. Abdullah, “SEUI-64, bits an IPv6 addressing strategy to mitigate reconnaissance attacks,” Eng. Sci. Technol., Vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 667–72, Apr. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Kumar and P. Tomar, “IPv6 addressing scheme with a secured duplicate address detection,” IETE. J. Res. May 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Xu, L. Jianwei, J. Hao, L. Dan, and C. Han, “IPV6 address configuration method in 6LoWPAN oriented to the Internet of power things,” in Smart Grid and Innovative Frontiers in Telecommunications. SmartGIFT, 2021, Vol. 373. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-73562-3_10
   Google Scholar
• A. Hussain, et al., “A resource efficient hybrid proxy mobile IPv6 extension for next generation IoT networks,” IEEE Internet Things J. 2021. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3058982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Yao and F. Dressler, “Dynamic address allocation for management and control in wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, Big Island, Jan. 2007, pp. 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• “Contiki: The Operating System for Connecting the Next Billion Devices—The Internet of Things.” Available: http://www.sics.se/contiki/
   Google Scholar
• T. Narten, E. Nordmark, W. Simpson, and H. Siliman, “Neighbor discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6),” Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 2461, Sep. 2007.
   Google Scholar