Enhancing the Output Power of the Partially Shaded PV Array Using the Corona Virus Optimization Algorithm

REFERENCES

• K. Sundareswaran, S. Peddapati, and S. Palani, “MPPT of PV systems under partial shaded conditions through a colony of flashing fireflies,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 463–472, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Ishaque, and Z. Salam, “A deterministic particle swarm optimization maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic system under partial shading condition,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 3195–3206, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Venkateswari, and S. Sreejith, “Factors influencing the efficiency of photovoltaic system,” Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., Vol. 101, pp. 376–394, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. S. Tey, S. Mekhilef, M. Seyedmahmoudian, B. Horan, A. T. Oo, and A. Stojcevski, “Improved differential evolution-based MPPT algorithm using SEPIC for PV systems under partial shading conditions and load variation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., Vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 4322–4333, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. L. Jiang, D. L. Maskell, and J. C. Patra, “A novel ant colony optimization-based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems under partially shaded conditions,” Energy. Build., Vol. 58, pp. 227–236, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Duan, J. Leng, P. Duan, B. Hu, and M. Mao, “An improved variable step PO and global scanning MPPT method for PV systems under partial shading condition.” in 2015 7th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (Vol. 1, pp. 382–386), IEEE, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• R. I. Balasubramanian, S. IlangoGanesan, and N. Chilakapati, “Impact of partial shading on the output power of PV systems under partial shading conditions,” IET Power Electron., Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 657–666, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. H. Liu, J. H. Chen, and J. W. Huang, “Global maximum power point tracking algorithm for PV systems operating under partially shaded conditions using the segmentation search method,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 103, pp. 350–363, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sarvi, S. Ahmadi, and S. Abdi, “A PSO-based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems under environmental and partially shaded conditions,” Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl., Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 201–214, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zheng, C. Wei, and S. Lin. “A maximum power point tracking method based on tabu search for PV systems under partially shaded conditions,” 2011.
   Google Scholar
• N. M. Pearsall, “Introduction to photovoltaic system performance,” in The Performance of Photovoltaic (PV) Systems, Woodhead publishing, 2017, pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• D. T. Cotfas, and P. A. Cotfas, “Multiconcept methods to enhance photovoltaic system efficiency,” International Journal of Photo Energy, Vol. 2019, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. K. Lo, T. P. Lee, and K. H. Wu, “Grid-connected photovoltaic system with power factor correction,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2224–2227, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÁA Bayod-Rújula, and J. A. Cebollero-Abián, “A novel MPPT method for PV systems with irradiance measurement,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 109, pp. 95–104, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kotti, and W. Shireen, “Efficient MPPT control for PV systems adaptive to fast changing irradiation and partial shading conditions,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 114, pp. 397–407, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bouilouta, A. Mellit, and S. A. Kalogirou, “New MPPT method for stand-alone photovoltaic systems operating under partially shaded conditions,” Energy, Vol. 55, pp. 1172–1185, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Mahmoud, and E. F. El-Saadany, “Fast power-peaks estimator for partially shaded PV systems,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 206–217, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. M. Tsang, and W. L. Chan, “Maximum power point tracking for PV systems under partial shading conditions using current sweeping,” Energy Convers. Manage., Vol. 93, pp. 249–258, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. H. Ji, D. Y. Jung, J. G. Kim, J. H. Kim, T. W. Lee, and C. Y. Won, “A real maximum power point tracking method for mismatching compensation in PV array under partially shaded conditions,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1001–1009, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Seyedmahmoudian, R. Rahmani, S. Mekhilef, A. M. T. Oo, A. Stojcevski, T. K. Soon, and A. S. Ghandhari, “Simulation and hardware implementation of new maximum power point tracking technique for partially shaded PV system using hybrid DEPSO method,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 850–862, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, I. Hussain, B. Singh, and B. K. Panigrahi, “MPPT in dynamic condition of partially shaded PV system by using WODE technique,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1204–1214, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. L. Jiang, D. R. Nayanasiri, D. L. Maskell, and D. M. Vilathgamuwa, “A hybrid maximum power point tracking for partially shaded photovoltaic systems in the tropics,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 76, pp. 53–65, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Roman, R. Alonso, P. Ibañez, S. Elorduizapatarietxe, and D. Goitia, “Intelligent PV module for grid-connected PV systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1066–1073, 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Titri, C. Larbes, K. Y. Toumi, and K. Benatchba, “A new MPPT controller based on the Ant colony optimization algorithm for photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions,” Appl. Soft. Comput., Vol. 58, pp. 465–479, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Karatepe, and T. Hiyama, “Artificial neural network-polar coordinated fuzzy controller based maximum power point tracking control under partially shaded conditions,” IET Renew. Power Gener., Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 239–253, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Elbaset, H. Ali, M. Abd-El Sattar, and M. Khaled, “Implementation of a modified perturb and observe maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic system using an embedded microcontroller,” IET Renew. Power Gener., Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 551–560, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. A. Ahmed, and M. Miyatake, “A novel maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic applications under partially shaded insolation conditions,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., Vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 777–784, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. S. Goud, R. Kalpana, and B. Singh, “A hybrid global maximum power point tracking technique with fast convergence speed for partial-shaded PV systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 5367–5376, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Sai Krishna, and T. Moger, “Improved SuDoKu reconfiguration technique for total-cross-tied PV array to enhance maximum power under partial shading conditions,” Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., Vol. 109, pp. 333–348, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Venkateswari, and N. Rajasekar, “Power enhancement of PV system via physical array reconfiguration based Lo Shu technique,” Energ. Convers. Manage., Vol. 215, p. 112885, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nihanth, J. Ram, D. Pillai, A. Ghias, A. Garg, and N. Rajasekar, “Enhanced power production in PV arrays using a new skyscraper puzzle based one-time reconfiguration procedure under partial shade conditions (PSCs),” Sol. Energy, Vol. 194, pp. 209–224, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Yadav, R. Pachauri, Y. Chauhan, S. Choudhury, and R. Singh, “Performance enhancement of partially shaded PV array using novel shade dispersion effect on magic-square puzzle configuration,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 144, pp. 780–797, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Sagar, D. Pathak, P. Gaur, and V. Jain, “A Su Do Ku puzzle based shade dispersion for maximum power enhancement of partially shaded hybrid bridge-link-total-cross-tied PV array,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 204, pp. 161–180, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Alik, and A. Jusoh, “An enhanced P&O checking algorithm MPPT for high tracking efficiency of partially shaded PV module,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 163, pp. 570–580, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Akrami, and K. Pourhossein, “A novel reconfiguration procedure to extract maximum power from partially-shaded photovoltaic arrays,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 173, pp. 110–119, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kapoor, and R. Garg, “Evaluation of optimum PV tilt angle with generated and predicted solar electric data using geospatial open source software in cloud environment,” Sādhanā, Vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 1–4, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mamun, M. Islam, M. Hasanuzzaman, and J. Selvaraj, “Effect of tilt angle on the performance and electrical parameters of a PV module: comparative indoor and outdoor experimental investigation,” Energy and Built Environment Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 278–290, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• N. Skandalos, and D. Karamanis, “An optimization approach to photovoltaic building integration towards low energy buildings in different climate zones,” Appl. Energy, Vol. 295, p. 117017, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Velasco-Quesada, F. Guinjoan-Gispert, R. Piqué-López, M. Román-Lumbreras, and A. Conesa-Roca, “Electrical PV array reconfiguration strategy for energy extraction improvement in grid-connected PV systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 4319–4331, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Nguyen, and B. Lehman, “An adaptive solar photovoltaic array using model-based reconfiguration algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2644–2654, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. P. Storey, P. R. Wilson, and D. Bagnall, “Improved optimization strategy for irradiance equalization in dynamic photovoltaic arrays,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2946–2956, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Bana, and R. P. Saini, “A mathematical modeling framework to evaluate the performance of single diode and double diode based SPV systems,” Energ Rep, Vol. 2, pp. 171–187, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Ganti, H. Naik, and M. K. Barada, “Hybrid TSA-RBFNN based approach for MPPT of the solar PV panel under the effects of tilt angles variations and environmental effects,” Int. J. Energy Res., Vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 20104–20131, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Shams, S. Mekhilef, and K. S. Tey, “Maximum power point tracking using modified butterfly optimization algorithm for partial shading, uniform shading, and fast varying load conditions,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 5569–5581, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. T. T. Bui, J. F. Torres, D. Gutiérrez-Avilés, V. H. Nhu, D. T. Bui, and F. Martínez-Álvarez, “Deformation forecasting of a hydropower dam by hybridizing a long short-term memory deep learning network with the coronavirus optimization algorithm,” Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng, 2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Yang, et al., “Socio-inspired democratic political algorithm for optimal PV array reconfiguration to mitigate partial shading,” Sust. Ener. Technol Assess, Vol. 48, p. 101627, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar