Alcoholic EEG Signal Classification Using Multi-Heuristic Classifiers with Stochastic Gradient Descent Technique for Tuning the Hyperparameters

References

• A. J. Gabor, “Seizure detection using a self-organizing neural network: validation and comparison with other detection strategies,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., Vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 1998. doi:10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00043-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S. K. Prabhakar, H. Rajaguru, and S. Lee. “A comprehensive analysis of alcoholic EEG signals with detrend fluctuation analysis and post classifiers,” In: 2019 7th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), 1–6, 2019. doi:10.1109/IWW-BCI.2019.8737328.
   Google Scholar
• M. Van Gils, et al., “Signal processing in prolonged EEG recordings during intensive care,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., Vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 56–63, 1997. doi:10.1109/51.637118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• V. Srinivasan, C. Eswaran, and N. Sriraam, “Artificial neural network based epileptic detection using time-domain and frequency-domain features,” J. Med. Syst., Vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 647–660, 2005. doi:10.1007/s10916-005-6133-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Liu, et al., “Detection of neonatal seizures through computerized EEG analysis,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., Vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 30–37, 1992. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(92)90179-L.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• F. Mormann, et al., “Seizure prediction: the long and winding road,” Brain, Vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 314–333, 2007. doi:10.1093/brain/awl241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S. K. Prabhakar, and H. Rajaguru. “Comparison of Isomap and matrix factorization with mahalanobis based sparse representation classifier for epilepsy classification from EEG signals,” In: 2017 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC), 2017, pp. 580–583. doi:10.1109/R10-HTC.2017.8289027.
   Google Scholar
• S. Deivasigamani, C. Senthilpari, and W. H. Yong, “RETRACTED ARTICLE: Machine learning method based detection and diagnosis for epilepsy in EEG signal,” J. Amb. Intell. Human. Comput., Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 4215–4221, 2021. doi:10.1007/s12652-020-01816-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Rajaguru, and S. K. Prabhakar. “Analysis of adaboost classifier from compressed EEG features for epilepsy detection,” In: 2017 International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), 981–984, 2017. doi:10.1109/ICCMC.2017.8282614.
   Google Scholar
• H. Rajaguru, and S. K. Prabhakar. “Hilbert transform with Elman backpropagation and multilayer perceptrons for epilepsy classification” In: 2017 International Conference of Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), vol. 1, pp. 571–576, 2017. doi:10.1109/ICECA.2017.8203601.
   Google Scholar
• R. Chatterjee, D. Guha, D. K. Sanyal, and S. N. Mohanty. “Discernibility matrix based dimensionality reduction for EEG signal,” In: 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), 2703–2706, 2016. doi:10.1109/TENCON.2016.7848530.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gaur, R. B. Pachori, H. Wang, and G. Prasad, “An automatic subject specific intrinsic mode function selection for enhancing Two-class EEG-based motor imagery-brain computer interface,” IEEE Sens. J., Vol. 19, no. 16, pp. 6938–6947, 2019. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2019.2912790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Zhang, L. Yao, K. Chen, and J. Monaghan, “A convolutional recurrent attention model for subject-independent EEG signal analysis,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., Vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 715–719, 2019. doi:10.1109/LSP.2019.2906824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Sehgal, D. Mehrotra, and M. Bala, “Designing ANFIS model to predict the reliability of component-based system,” in Soft computing: theories and applications, . Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 584, M. Pant, K. Ray, T. Sharma, S. Rawat, and A. Bandyopadhyay, Ed. Singapore: Springer, 2018, pp. 1–9. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5699-4_1.
   Google Scholar
• T. Zhang, W. Chen, and M. Li, “Classification of inter-ictal and ictal EEGs using multi-basis MODWPT, dimensionality reduction algorithms and LS-SVM: A comparative study,” Biomed. Signal Process. Contr., Vol. 47, pp. 240–251, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2018.08.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-H. Jeong, K.-H. Shim, D.-J. Kim, and S.-W. Lee, “Brain-controlled robotic arm system based on multi-directional CNN-BiLSTM network using EEG signals,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., Vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1226–1238, 2020. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2981659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Mammone, et al., “Brain network analysis of compressive sensed high-density EEG signals in AD and MCI subjects,” IEEE Trans. Indust. Informatics, Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 527–536, 2019. doi:10.1109/TII.2018.2868431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Bi, H. Wang, T. Teng, and C. Guan, “A novel method of emergency situation detection for a brain-controlled vehicle by combining EEG signals with surrounding information,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., Vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1926–1934, 2018. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2868486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ghaemi, E. Rashedi, A. M. Pourrahimi, M. Kamandar, and F. Rahdari, “Automatic channel selection in EEG signals for classification of left or right hand movement in Brain Computer Interfaces using improved binary gravitation search algorithm,” Biomed. Signal Process. Contr., Vol. 33, pp. 109–118, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2016.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Xiong, Z. Yu, T. Ma, H. Wang, X. Lu, and H. Fan, “Classifying action intention understanding EEG signals based on weighted brain network metric features,” Biomed. Signal Process. Contr., Vol. 59, pp. 101893, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Patidar, et al., “An integrated alcoholic index using tunable-Q wavelet transform based features extracted from EEG signals for diagnosis of alcoholism,” Appl. Soft Comput., Vol. 50, pp. 71–78, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. K. Prabhakar, and H. Rajaguru. “Alcoholic EEG signal classification with correlation dimension based distance metrics approach and Modified Adaboost classification,” Heliyon, Vol. 6, no. 12, pp. e05689, 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-H. Kim, Z. Woo Geem, and G.-T. Han, “Hyperparameter optimization method based on harmony search algorithm to improve performance of 1D CNN human respiration pattern recognition system,” IEEE Sensors J., Vol. 20, no. 13, pp. 1–19, 2020. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2020.2991711.
   Google Scholar
• L. F. Ahyar, S. Suyanto, and A. Arifianto. “Firefly algorithm-based hyperparameters setting of DRNN for weather prediction,” In: 2020 International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA), 1–5, 2020. doi:10.1109/ICoDSA50139.2020.9212921.
   Google Scholar
• A. A. Mas’ud, A. Sundaram, J. A. Ardila-Rey, R. Schurch, F. Muhammad-Sukki, and N. A. Bani, “Application of the Gaussian Mixture Model to Classify Stages of Electrical Tree Growth in Epoxy Resin,” Sensors, Vol. 21, no. 7, pp. C1–C1, 2021. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2021.3059585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCI KDD database [Online]. Available: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/eegdatabase.
   Google Scholar
• H. Polat, and M. S. Ozerdem. “Epileptic seizure detection from EEG signals by using wavelet and Hilbert transform,” In: 2016 XII International Conference on Perspective Technologies and Methods in MEMS Design (MEMSTECH), 66–69, 2016. doi:10.1109/MEMSTECH.2016.7507522.
   Google Scholar
• T. M. Bakhsh, S. Meshgini, and A. Farzamnia. “Identification of Epilepsy utilizing Hilbert Transform and SVM based Classifier,” In: 2020 28th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), 1–5, 2020. doi:10.1109/ICEE50131.2020.9260716.
   Google Scholar
• R. Usharani, and M. Murali, “A review of dimensionality reduction methods applied on clinical data of diabetic neuropathy complaints,” Intern. J. Bioinform. Res. Applic., Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 324–342, 2021. doi:10.1504/IJBRA.2021.117930.
   Google Scholar
• O. Hirose, “Acceleration of non-rigid point set registration with Downsampling and Gaussian process regression,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., Vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2858–2865, 2021. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3043769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. K. Prabhakar, H. Rajaguru, and S. Lee, “Metaheuristic-Based dimensionality reduction and classification analysis of PPG signals for interpreting cardiovascular disease,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 7, pp. 165181–165206, 2019. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. F. Kenney, and E. S. Keeping. Mathematics of statistics, Pt. 2. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• W. Zhou, Y. Liu, Q. Yuan, and X. Li, “Epileptic seizure detection using lacunarity and Bayesian linear discriminant analysis in intracranial EEG,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 3375–3381, 2013. doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2254486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yuan, J. Liu, J. Shang, et al., “The earth mover’s distance and Bayesian linear discriminant analysis for epileptic seizure detection in scalp EEG,” Biomed. Eng. Lett, Vol. 8, pp. 373–382, 2018. doi:10.1007/s13534-018-0082-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Weisberg. Applied linear regression. Vol. 528. Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S.: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• D. C. Montgomery, E. A. Peck, and G. Geoffrey Vining. Introduction to linear regression analysis. Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S.: John Wiley & Sons, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• A. Subasi, and E. Ercelebi, “Classification of EEG signals using neural network and logistic regression,” Comput. Meth. Progr. Biomed., Vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 87–99, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.10.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. M. Thomas, A. Temko, G. Lightbody, W. P. Marnane, and G. B. Boylan. “A Gaussian mixture model based statistical classification system for neonatal seizure detection,” In: 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, 1–6, 2009. doi:10.1109/MLSP.2009.5306203.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Li, et al., “Epileptic seizure detection based on time-frequency images of EEG signals using Gaussian mixture model and gray level co-occurrence matrix features,” Int. J. Neural Syst., Vol. 28, no. 07, pp. 1850003, 2018. doi:10.1142/S012906571850003X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Sabeti, S. D. Katebi, R. Boostani, and G. W. Price, “A new approach for EEG signal classification of schizophrenic and control participants,” Expert Syst. Applic., Vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 2063–2071, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Chatterjee, S. Pratiher, and R. Bose, “Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis based novel feature extraction technique for automated detection of focal and non-focal electroencephalogram signals,” IET Sci. Measur. Technol., Vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1014–1021, 2017. doi:10.1049/iet-smt.2017.0117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Liu, et al., “Feature selection for motor imagery EEG classification based on firefly algorithm and learning automata,” Sensors, Vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 2576, 2017. doi:10.3390/s17112576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mohdiwale, M. Sahu, G. R. Sinha, and V. Bhateja, “Statistical wavelets with harmony search- based optimal feature selection of EEG signals for motor imagery classification,” IEEE Sensors J., Vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 14263–14271, 2021. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2020.3026172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sreeshakthy, and J. Preethi, “Classification of human emotion from deapeeg signal using hybrid improved neural networks with cuckoo search,” BRAIN. Broad Res. Artif. Intell. Neurosci., Vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 60–73, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• X. Liu, and H. Fu, “PSO-based support vector machine with cuckoo search technique for clinical disease diagnoses,” The Scientific World J., Vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, “Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition,” Proc. IEEE, Vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278–2324, 1998. doi:10.1109/5.726791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ruder. “An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747, pp. 1–14, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• V. Maeda-Gutiérrez, et al., “Comparison of convolutional neural network architectures for classification of tomato plant diseases,” Appl. Sci., Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• M. G. Shankar, and C. Ganesh Babu, “An exploration of ECG signal feature selection and classification using machine learning techniques,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. Regul., Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 797–804, 2020. doi:10.35940/ijitee.C8728.019320.
   Google Scholar
• D. Chicco, and G. Jurman, “The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation,” BMC Gen., Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021.
   Google Scholar