A Unified Neuro-Fuzzy Framework to Assess the User Credibility on Twitter

REFERENCES

• S. Bazzaz, and E. Mahdipour. “Twitter spam detection: A systematic review.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.14754; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Ren, and D. Ji, “Learning to detect deceptive opinion spam: A survey.,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 7, pp. 42934–45, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Nurdiatama, and I. Budi, “Malicious account detection on twitter based on tweet account features using machine learning,” in 2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 2019, pp. 1–5. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• A. R. Pathak, A. Mahajan, K. Singh, A. Patil, and A. Nair, “Analysis of techniques for rumor detection in social media,” Procedia Comput. Sci., Vol. 167, pp. 2286–2296, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• O. Varol, and A. Flammini, “Online human-bot interactions: detection, estimation, and characterization,” in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 11, no. 1, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• M. Orabi, and I. Kamel, “Detection of bots in social media: A systematic review.,” Inf. Process. Manag., Vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 102250, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. M. G. de Morais, and L. A. Digiampietri, “Methods and challenges in social bots detection: A systematic review,” in XVII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, 1–8, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• https://www.talkwalker.com/hashtag-tracking?gclid=Cj0KCQiAvP6ABhCj.
   Google Scholar
• W. Daffa, O. Bamasag, and A. AlMansour, “A survey on spam URLs detection in Twitter,” in 2018 1st International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–6
   Google Scholar
• P. Meel, and D. K. Vishwakarma, “Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities.,” Expert. Syst. Appl., Vol. 153, pp. 112986, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Uma Maheswari, and S. S. Dhenakaran, “Opinion mining on integrated social networks and E-commerce blog,” IETE. J. Res., Vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2080–2088, 2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wang, and M. Zhou, “Drifted Twitter spam classification using multiscale detection test on KL divergence,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 7, pp. 108384–108394, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Alrubaian, and M. M. Hassan, “Detecting spamming activities in twitter based on deep-learning technique,” Concur Compu: Pract Exp, Vol. 29, no. 19, pp. e4209, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gharge, and M. Chavan, “An integrated approach for malicious tweets detection using NLP,” in 2017 International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), IEEE, pp. 435–438, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• G. Jardaneh, and D. Johnson, “Classifying Arabic tweets based on credibility using content and user features,” in 2019 IEEE Jordan International Joint Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (JEEIT), IEEE, pp. 596–601, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• M. Jiang, P. Cui, and C. Faloutsos, “Suspicious behavior detection: current trends and future directions.,” IEEE Intell. Syst., Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Madisetty, and M. S. Desarkar, “A neural network-based ensemble approach for spam detection in twitter.,” IEEE Transactions on Comput Soc Sys, Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 973–984, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Jain, M. Sharma, and B. Agarwal, “Spam detection in social media using convolutional and long short term memory neural network.,” Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., Vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 21–44, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Li, Q. Zhang, and L. Si, “Rumor detection by exploiting user credibility information, attention and multi-task learning,” in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1173–1179, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• S. Yang, K. Shu, S. Wang, R. Gu, F. Wu, and H. Liu, “Unsupervised fake news detection on social media: A generative approach.,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33, no. 01, pp. 5644–5651, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• S. Prabu, J. Padmanabhan, and G. Bala, “Effective ensemble dimensionality reduction approach using denoising autoencoder for intrusion detection system,” in Intelligent Sustainable Systems: Proceedings of ICISS 2021, vol. 213, Singapore: Springer, 2022, pp. 273–285.
   Google Scholar
• H. Tajalizadeh, and R. Boostani, “A novel stream clustering framework for spam detection in twitter.,” IEEE Trans. Compu. Soc. Sys., Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 525–534, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Hayawi, S. Mathew, N. Venugopal, M. M. Masud, and P.-H. Ho, “Deeprobot: a hybrid deep neural network model for social bot detection based on user profile data,” Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. E. Daouadi, R. Z. Rebaï, and I. Amous, “Real-time bot detection from twitter using the twitterbot+ framework,” JUCS J. Univ. Comp. Sci., Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 496–507, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.-González, and J. I. Mata-Sánchez, “Contrast pattern-based classification for bot detection on twitter,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 7, pp. 45800–45817, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. S. Adewole, and A. K. Sangaiah, “Twitter spam account detection based on clustering and classification methods,” J. Supercomput., Vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 4802–4837, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. El-Mawass, P. Honeine, and L. Vercouter, “Similcatch: enhanced social spammers detection on twitter using Markov random fields.,” Inf. Process. Manag., Vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 102317, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Abu-Salih, and K. Y. Chan, “Twitter mining for ontology-based domain discovery incorporating machine learning,” J. Knowl. Manag., Vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 949–981, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Fazil, and M. Abulaish, “A hybrid approach for detecting automated spammers in twitter,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., Vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2707–2719, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Reddy, and M. Sandhya, “Spam detection and fake user identification methodologies in social networks using extreme machine learning,” Int. J. Analyt. Exper. Modal. Anal., Vol. 13, pp. 2367–2374, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• F. Masood, and M. Zuair, “Spammer detection and fake user identification on social networks,” IEEE. Access., Vol. 7, pp. 68140–68152, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• W. Herzallah, H. Faris, and O. Adwan, “Feature engineering for detecting spammers on Twitter: modelling and analysis.,” J. Inf. Sci., Vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 230–247, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Alrubaian, and A. Alamri, “A credibility analysis system for assessing information on Twitter,” IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput., Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 661–674, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Jayashree, and K. Laila, “Social network mining for predicting users’ credibility with optimal feature selection,” in Intelligent Sustainable Systems: Proceedings of ICISS 2021, vol. 213, Singapore: Springer, 2022, pp. 361–373.
   Google Scholar
• H. Jelodar, and L. Zhao, “Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and topic modeling: models, applications, a survey.,” Multimed. Tools. Appl., Vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 15169–15211, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Jose, and S. S. Babu, “Detecting spammers on social network through clustering technique.,” J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput., 1–15, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wu, “The text mining and classification analyses of tumor based on twitter.,” IETE. J. Res., Vol. 69, no 4, pp. 1945–1951, 2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Stewart, W. Liu, and R. Cardell-Oliver. “Word-level lexical normalisation using context-dependent embeddings.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.06172., Vol. 69 no. 4, pp. 1945–1951, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• R. Chowdhury, and S. K. Bandyopadhyay. A method based on NLP for Twitter spam detection; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• J. Yin, and G. Xu, “Leveraging multi-level dependency of relational sequences for social spammer detection,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 428, pp. 130–141, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Chen, and P. Cheng, “ACTSSD: social spammer detection based on active learning and co-training,” J. Supercomput., Vol. 78, 2744–2771, 2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Qui, and C. P. Chen, “An adaptive social spammer detection model with semi-supervised broad learning,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., Vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 4622–4635, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Hans, L. Ahuja, and S. K. Muttoo, “An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for detecting redirection spam,” in 2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), IEEE, pp. 559–564, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• D. Prihadi, and V. Trisyanti. Fuzzy logic approach for email SPAM detection system.
   Google Scholar
• K. Lee, B. D. Eoff, and J. Caverlee, “A long-term study of content polluters on twitter,” ICWSM, Seven Months with the Devils, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• N. B. Taghvaei, and M. R. Keyvanpour, “A hybrid framework for personality prediction based on fuzzy neural networks and deep neural networks,” J. AI Data Mining, Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 283–294, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Spam Policy Online Search on Twitter. Available: http://www.webcitation.org/78VPLwy11, Accessed May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ramalingaiah, S. Hussaini, and S. Chaudhari, “Twitter bot detection using supervised machine learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., Vol. 1950, no. 1, pp. 012006, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• http://jmcauley.ucsd.edu/data/amazon/\\index_2014.html.
   Google Scholar