Self‐ and Peer‐Assessment Disparities in University Ranking Schemes

References

• Arnold , J. and MacKenzie , D. K. 1992 . “Self‐ratings and Supervisor Ratings of Graduate Employees' Competences during Early Career” . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 65 (3) : 235 – 250 .
   Google Scholar
• Atkins , P. W. B. and Wood , R. E. 2002 . “Self‐ versus Others' Ratings as Predictors of Assessment Center Ratings: Validation Evidence for 360‐degree Feedback Programs” . Personnel Psychology , 55 (4) : 871 – 904 .
   Google Scholar
• Beehr , T. A. , Ivanitskaya , L. , Hansen , C. P. , Erofeev , D. and Gudanowski , D. M. 2001 . “Evaluation of 360‐degree Feedback Ratings: Relationships with Each Other and with Performance and Selection Predictors” . Journal of Organizational Behavior , 22 : 775 – 788 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio , W. F. 1991 . “Multifaceted Conceptions of Self‐Other Ratings Disagreement” . Personnel Psychology , 52 : 1 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Cheung , G. W. 1999 . “Multifaceted Conceptions of Self‐other Ratings Disagreement” . Personnel Psychology , 52 : 1 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill , D. D. and Soo , M. 2005 . “Academic Quality, League Tables, and Public Policy: A Cross‐national Analysis of University Ranking Systems” . Higher Education , 49 : 495 – 533 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham , A. and Stringfield , P. 1998 . “Congruence in Job‐performance Ratings: A Study of 360‐degree Feedback Examining Self, Manager, Peers, and Consultant Ratings” . Human Relations , 51 (4) : 517 – 529 .
   Google Scholar
• Harris , M. M. and Schaubroeck , J. 1988 . “A Meta‐analysis of Self‐supervisor, Self‐peer, and Peer‐supervisor Ratings” . Personnel Psychology , 41 : 43 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabe , P. and West , S. 1982 . “Validity of Self‐evaluation of Ability: A Review and Meta‐analysis” . Journal of Applied Psychology , 67 : 280 – 296 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers , M. J. and Birnbaum , D. 1991 . “Assessing Self‐appraisal of Job Performance as an Evaluation Device: Are the Poor Results a Function of Method or Methodology?” . Human Relations , 44 (10) : 1081 – 1091 .
   Google Scholar
• Thornton , G. 1980 . “Psychometric Properties of Self‐appraisal and Job Performance” . Personnel Psychology , 33 : 263 – 271 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant , M. and DesMarchais , J. E. 2002 . “Accuracy of Student Self‐assessment Ability Compared to Their Own Performance in a Problem‐based Learning Medical Program: A Correlation Study” . Advances in Health Sciences Education , 7 : 19 – 27 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher , A. and Savino , M. 2007 . “A Global Survey of University Rankings and League Tables” . Higher Education in Europe , 32 (1) : 5 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• van der Heijden , B. I. J. M. and Nijhof , A. H. J. 2004 . “The Value of Subjectivity: Problems and Prospects for 360‐degree Appraisal Systems” . International Journal of Human Resource Management , 15 (3) : 493 – 511 .
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke , N. 2005 . “Twenty Years of University Report Cards” . Higher Education in Europe , 30 (2) : 103 – 125 .
   Google Scholar
• Van Velsor , E. , Taylor , S. and Leslie , J. B. 1993 . “An Examination of the Relationships among Self‐perception Accuracy, Self‐awareness, Gender, and Leader Effectiveness” . Human Resource Management , 32 : 249 – 263 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , R. and Van Dyke , N. 2007 . “Measuring the International Standing of Universities with an Application to Australian Universities” . Journal of Higher Education , 53 (6)
   Google Scholar
• Williams , R. and Van Dyke , N. 2006 . “Rating Major Disciplines in Australian Universities: Perceptions and Reality” . Retrieved on 18/03/2008, from ⟨www.melbourneinstitute.com⟩
   Google Scholar
• Williams , R. and Van Dyke , N. 2005 . Melbourne Institute Index of the International Standing of Australian Universities 2005 , Melbourne : Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research .
   Google Scholar