Official statisticians as conceptual innovators

References

• Advisory Council for Science and Technology, 1968. Technological innovation in Britain. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, Edward, 1961. Research, invention, development and innovation. American Economic Review, 51(3), 370–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, Robert N, 1952. Management controls in industrial research organizations. Boston: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Homer G, 1953. Innovation: the basis of cultural change. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, James Phinney, 1946. Scientists against time. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Selvin W. and Whisler, Thomas L, 1967. The innovative organization: a selective view of current theory and research. The Journal of Business, 40(4), 462–469. doi: 10.1086/295011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1953. Scientific R&D in American industry: a survey of manpower and costs, Bulletin no. 1148. Washington: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, Vannevar, 1945. Science: the endless frontier. North Stratford: Ayer Co. [1995].
   Google Scholar
• Census Bureau and National Science Foundation, 2013. Finding from early stage scoping interviews in the United States: final report. Paris: OECD. Room Document no. 7, NESTI Meeting, 17–19 April.
   Google Scholar
• Dearborn, De Witt C., Kneznek, Rose W. and Anthony, Robert N., 1953. Spending for industrial research, 1951-1952. Washington: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University; US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Commerce, 1967. Technological innovation: its environment and management. Washington: USGPO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense, 1953a. Scientific research and development in American industry: a study of manpower and costs. Washington: Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) and Department of Defense (Research and Development Board).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense, 1953b. The growth of scientific R&D. Washington: Office of the Secretary of Defense (R&D). RDB 114/34.
   Google Scholar
• Dominion Bureau of Statistics, 1941. Survey of scientific and industrial laboratories in Canada. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat, 2001. Working party meeting on R&D and innovation statistics: main conclusions. 19–20 April.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat, 2002. Summary record of eurostat/OECD Task Force Meeting 20 March 2002 to Discuss the Co-ordination of R&D Surveys and Innovation Surveys. Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricant, Solomon, et al., 1975. Accounting by business firms for investment in research and development, section III: the literature on accounting for innovation (S. L. Ansari). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francoz, D., 2000a. Achieving reliable results from innovation surveys: methodological lessons learned from experience in OECD member countries. Communication presented to the Conference on Innovation and Enterprise Creation: Statistics and Indicators, Sophia Antipolis, 23–24 November.
   Google Scholar
• Francoz, D., 2000b. Measuring R&D in R&D and innovation surveys: analysis of causes of Divergence in nine OECD countries. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI (2000) 26.
   Google Scholar
• Gilfillan, S.C., 1952. The prediction of technical change. The Review of Economics and Statistics 34(4), 368–385. doi: 10.2307/1926864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2002. The rise of innovation surveys: measuring a fuzzy concept. Montreal: INRS. Project on the History and Sociology of STI Statistics, Available from: www.csiic.ca.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2003. Measuring science: is there “basic research” without statistics? Social Science Information, 42(1), 57–90. doi: 10.1177/0539018403042001795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2005. The measurement of science and technology: 1920 to the Present. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2006a. On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 68(1), 109–133. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0086-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2006b. Research and development: how the “D” got into R&D. Science and Public Policy, 33(1), 59–76. doi: 10.3152/147154306781779190
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2006c. The linear model of innovation: the historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(6), 639–667. doi: 10.1177/0162243906291865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2007. From eugenics to scientometrics: Galton, Cattell, and men of science. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 691–728. doi: 10.1177/0306312706075338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2013. The institutionalization of statistics on science. Revista Entornos, 26(1), 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2014. Innovation and creativity: a Slogan, nothing but a Slogan. In: Cristiano Antonelli and Albert N. Link, eds. Routledge handbook of the economics of knowledge. London/New York: Routledge, 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2015. Innovation contested: the idea of innovation over the centuries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît, 2016. Why is imitation not innovation. In: Benoît Godin and Dominique Vinck, eds. Reflexive innovation: alternative approaches to the pro-innovation bias. London: Edward Elgar, Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît and Schauz, Désirée, 2016. The changing identity of research: a cultural and conceptual history. History of Science, Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, Maurice M., 1970. Introduction. In: Maurice M. Goldsmith, ed. Technological innovation and the economy. London/New York: Wiley, xiii–xvii.
   Google Scholar
• Grenzmann, C., 2000. Differences in the results of the R&D survey and innovation survey: remark on the state of the inquiry. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI/RD (2000) 24.
   Google Scholar
• Hildred, William H. and Bengston, Leroy A., 1974. Surveying investment in innovation. Colorado: University of Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Maurice and Spraragen, William, 1933. Research in hard times. Washington: Division of Engineering and Industrial Research, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, K., 1971. Social innovations in organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 1(3), 235–252. doi: 10.1080/00208825.1971.11656093
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Paul, 1975. Innovation and technology transfer – The roles and characteristics of individuals. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-22(1), 19–27. doi: 10.1109/TEM.1975.6447196
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Patrick, et al., 1974. Technological innovation: a critical review of current knowledge. Atlanta, Georgia: Advanced Technology and Science Studies Group, Georgia Tech. Report to the National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kimberly, John R, 1981. Managerial innovation. In: Paul C. Nystrom, ed. Handbook of organizational design. London: Oxford University Press, 84–104.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Kenneth E., 1967. A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process. The Journal of Business, 40, 478–496. doi: 10.1086/295013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machlup, Fritz, 1962. The supply of inventors and inventions. In: National Bureau of Economic Research, ed. The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 143–69.
   Google Scholar
• Maclaurin, William Rupert, 1955. Innovation and capital formation in some American industries. In: National Bureau of Economic Research, ed. Capital formation and economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 551–578.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 1920. Research laboratories in industrial establishments of the United States of America. Bulletin of the National Research Council, March.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 1941. Research: a national resource (II): industrial research. Washington: USGPO, National Resources Planning Board.
   Google Scholar
• National Resources Committee, 1938. Research: a national resource. Washington: USGPO.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1962. The measurement of scientific and technical activities: proposed standard practice for surveys of research and development. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1966. Government and technical innovation. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1968. Gaps in technology: general report. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1969. The management of innovation in education., Paris: OECD, CERI.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1970. The measurement of scientific and technical activities: proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1971. K. Pavitt and C. Wald, eds. The conditions for success in technological innovation. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1972. Ad hoc group on industrial innovation. Paris, OECD. DAS/SPR/72.32.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1976. The measurement of innovation-related activities in the business enterprise sector. Paris: OECD. DSTI/SPR/76.44.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1978. Policies for the stimulation of industrial innovation, volume 1. Paris: OECD. (Analytical Report).
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1981. The measurement of scientific and technical activities: proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1992. OECD proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1997. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2000. Record of the NESTI meeting. DSTI/EAS/STP/NEST/M (2000) 1.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2001. Assess whether there are changes needed as a result of the comparison of R&D data collected in R&D and in innovations surveys. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI (2001) 14/PART3.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2005. Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2012. The cognitive testing of innovation surveys: preliminary findings from a review by NESTI. Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2012)7.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2013. Findings from the OECD/NESTI scoping cognitive interviews on business innovation. Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2013)6.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2014a. The definition of R&D in the frascati manual: proposals by Frascati revision group 1. Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2014)7.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2014b. Findings from the OECD/NESTI project on the cognitive testing of innovation survey concepts, definitions and questions. Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2014)19.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2014c. Measuring public sector innovation: proposals for preliminary measurement guidelines. Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2014)16.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2014d. Overview of the state of the Frascati manual revision discussions: a note by the secretariat. Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2014)5.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2015. Frascati manual: guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2016a. Draft summary of the OECD/NESTI-EUROSTAT Oslo manual revision scoping. Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2016)1.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2016b. Preliminary proposals for the Oslo manual (OM4). Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2016)2/ANN3.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2016c. Review of the Oslo manual’s basic definitions: how to get a sound grasp of innovation? Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2016)2/ANN2.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2016d. Scoping the revision of the Oslo manual. Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2016)2.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2016e. The Oslo manual review: increasing the manual’s relevance for collecting evidence on innovation in a changing world. Paris: OECD. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2016)2/ANN1.
   Google Scholar
• Pavitt, Keith and Walker, William, 1976. Government policies towards industrial innovation: a review. Research Policy, 5, 11–97. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(76)90017-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perazich, George and Field, Philip M., 1940. Industrial research and changing technology. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia: Works Projects Administration. National Research Project, report no. M-4.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, Lawrence D. and Rosenberg, Leon J., 1974. The feasibility of monitoring expenditures for technological innovation. Washington: Practical Concepts Inc.
   Google Scholar
• President’s Scientific Research Board (PSRB), 1947. Science and public policy. Washington: USGPO.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Robert E. and Romine, Charles A., 1974. Investment in innovation. Kansas City: Midwest Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, Thomas S., 1971. Innovative behavior and communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Everett M., 1962. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Everett M., 1972. Key concepts and models. In: Robert A. Solo and Everett M. Rogers, eds. Inducing technological change for economic growth and development. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Everett M., 1983. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, Roy and Robertson, A.B., 1973. The role of communications in technological innovation. Research Policy, 2, 204–225. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(73)90003-6
   Google Scholar
• Scoville, Warren C., 1951. Minority migrations and the diffusion of technology. The Journal of Economic History, 11 (4), 347–360. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700085090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapley, Willis H., 1959. Problems of definition, concept, and interpretation of research and development statistics. In: National Science Foundation, ed. The methodology of statistics on R&D. Washington: National Science Foundation, 7–15. NSF 59-36.
   Google Scholar
• Sirilli, Georgio, 1999. Old and new paradigms in the measurement of R&D. The Journal of Science and Public Policy, 25 (5), 305–311.
   Google Scholar
• SPRU, 1972. Success and failure in industrial innovation. London: Center for the Study of Industrial Innovation. Report on Project SAPPHO.
   Google Scholar
• Twiss, Brian C., 1974. Managing technological innovation. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar