Democracy and participation in the twenty-first century

References

• Akkerman, T. (2017, August 9). Authoritarian nationalism, not populism, is real threat to democracy. Social Europe. Retrieved from https://www.socialeurope.eu/authoritarian-nationalism-not-populism-real-threat-democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. C., & Welzel, C. (2011). Measuring effective democracy: The human empowerment approach. Comparative Poltics, 43(3), 271–289. doi: 10.5129/001041511795274931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. (2016). Against democracy. The case for democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canfora, L. (2006). Democracy in Europe: A history of an ideology (making of Europe). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, P., & Lim, J.-H. (2016). The palgrave handbook of mass dictatorship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2004). Post democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Tocqueville, A. (1965). Democracy in America. London et al.: Oxford University Press [1835].
   Google Scholar
• The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2018). Democracy index 2017. Free speech under attack. London. Retrieved from http://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/Democracy_Index_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power. Democracy in practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation. The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5–18. doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galtung, J. (2001). Democracy for peace and development: An ever-expanding agenda. In G. Széll, & W. Ehlert (Eds.), New democracies and Old societies in Europe (pp. 102–110). Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Peter M. Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gayo-Avello, D. (2015, April-June). Social media, democracy, and democratization. IEEE MultiMedia, 22(2), 10–16. doi:10.1109/MMUL.2015.47. doi: 10.1109/MMUL.2015.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayo-Avello, D. (2017, July-August 24). Social media Won’t free Us. IEEE MultiMedia. 98–101. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7994552
   Google Scholar
• Gorz, A. (1987). Farewell to the working class: An essay on post-industrial socialism. London : Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grassegger, H., & Krogerus, M. (2016, December 3). Ich habe nur gezeigt, dass es die Bombe gibt. Das Magazin.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, B. (1980). Friendly fascism: The new face of power in America. New York: M. Evans.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1991). Third Wave: Democratisation in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (2003). How solid is mass support for democracy—and how can we measure it?. Political Science and Politics, 36(1), 51–57. doi: 10.1017/S1049096503001689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Toward a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laski, H. J. (1933). Democracy in crisis. London: Allen and Unwin and New York: AMS Press [Reprint 1969].
   Google Scholar
• Messner, J. J. (Ed.). (2015). The fragile states index. The book. Washington, DC: The Fund For Peace. Retrieved from http://fundforpeace.org/fsi/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Fragile-States-Index-Annual-Report-2015-ver-9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, M., & Osborne, T. (2017). Populism: A deflationary view. Economy and Society, 46(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2017.1308059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorstedt, M. (2017, November 13). Wir machen einfach noch süchtiger. Süddeutsche Zeitung. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (Ed.). (1992). Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, community. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. (2011). Contesting democracy. Political ideas in twentieth-century Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment Now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Postman, N. (1999). A bridge to the eighteenth century. New York: Alfred Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. N., & Schiebinger, L. (Eds.). (2008). Agnotology. The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-Democracy. Politics in an Age of distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 3–17. doi: 10.1353/jod.1999.0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soros, G. (2000). Open society: Reforming global capitalism. New York: Public Affairs Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Sünker, H. (2002). Democracy, participation and education. In G. Széll, D. Chetty, & A. Chouraqui (Eds.), Participation, globalisation and culture (pp. 186–206). Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Peter M. Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sünker, H. (2006). Politics, bildung and social justice. Perspectives for a democratic society. Rotterdam and Taipei: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Sünker, H. (2008). Globalisation, democracy and education. In G. Széll, C.-H. Bösling, & U. Széll (Eds.), Education, labour and science – perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 51–72). Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sünker, H., Farnen, R., & Széll, G. (Eds.). (2003). Political socialisation, participation and education – change of the epoch. Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Széll, G. (1989). The role of competence in participation, workers’ control, and self-management. In G. Széll, P. Blyton, & C. Cornforth (Eds.), The state, trade unions and self-management. Issues of competence and control (pp. 1–14). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Széll, G. (2001). Risk and reason – or the end of the Age of enlightenment? In G. Széll, & W. Ehlert (Eds.), New democracies and Old societies in Europe (pp. 63–72). Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Széll, G. (2008). Demokratietheorien heute. Sozialwissenschaftliche Literatur Rundschau, 31(56-1), 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Traub, J. (2016, June 28). It’s Time for the Elites to Rise up against the ignorant Masses. Foreign Policy.
   Google Scholar
• van Reybrouck, D. (2016). Against elections: The case for democracy. London: Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Vester, M., et al. (2013). Participatory or authoritarian democracy – alternatives of society’s organization in the crisis of capitalism. In N.-S. Litsa (Ed.), Citizen participation in social welfare, social policy and community involvement. Shaping trends and attitudes of social responsibility (pp. 123–138). Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Werning, R. (2017). Die Erfindung des Dutertismo. Zeit-online, 30. Juni. Retrieved from http://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2017-06/rodrigo-duterte-philippinen-macht-manila-drogenpolitik.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2018). Agnotology. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnotology
   Google Scholar
• Yazawa, S. (2015, July 16). The crisis of democracy in Japan. Open Democracy. Retrieved from https://www.opendemocracy.net/shujiro-yazawa/crisis-of-democracy-in-japan
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. (1997). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22–43. doi: 10.2307/20048274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar