Use of the Triple Helix model of innovation to explore the factors conditioning the effectiveness of a framework for monitoring the prevalence and impact of the fall armyworm in Africa

References

• Adolf, M., Mast, J. L., & Stehr, N. (2013). Culture and cognition. The foundations of innovation in modern societies. In F. Adam, & H. Westlund (Eds.), Innovation in socio-cultural context (pp. 25–39). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., … Welle, T. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards, 67(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft. (2017). Worldriskreport. Analysis and prospects 2017. Bonn: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Brancheau, J. C., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1990). The adoption of spreadsheet software: Testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of End-user computing. Information Systems Research, 1(2), 115–143. doi: 10.1287/isre.1.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallini, S., et al. (2016). Using the quadruple Helix approach to accelerate the transfer of research and innovation results to regional growthm. Technical Report of the European Union. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6e54c161-36a9-11e6-a825-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (2017). Organizational innovation-issue of oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Retrieved from http://business.oxfordre.com/view/10 .1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-19
   Google Scholar
• De Groeve, T., Poljansek, K., & Vernaccini, L. (2015). Index for risk management – INFORM. Concept and methodology. Version 2016. Ispra: Joint Research Centre (JRC).
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27, 823–833. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2002). The Triple Helix of university – Industry – Government implications for policy and evaluation. Working Paper of The Swedish Institute for Studies in Education and Research. Retrieved from http://www.sister.nu/pdf/wp_11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64–77. doi: 10.1504/IJTG.2004.004551
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix. University–Industry–Government innovation in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2001). The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5(4), 338–344.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). Fall armyworm. Retrieved from www.fao.org/fall-armyworm/en/
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London-Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mallat, N. (2006). The impact of Use situation and mobility on the acceptance of mobile ticketing services. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press. E-book.
   Google Scholar
• Plouffe, C. R., Hulland, J. S., Vandenbosch, M.et al. (2001). Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions—Understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 208–222. doi: 10.1287/isre.12.2.208.9697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalingam, B. (2013). Aid on the edge of chaos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2009). Civil society, governmentality and the contradictions of governance-beyond-the-state: The Janus-face of social innovation. In D. MacCallum (Ed.), Social innovation and territorial development (pp. 63–78). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viale, R., & Etzkowitz, H. (2005). Third academic revolution: Polyvalent knowledge; the DNA of the triple helix, Theme paper for the 5th International Triple Helix 5. The capitalization of knowledge: cognitive, economic, social & cultural aspect, Mau Turin 10–21.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefikhah, S. (2017). Sociology of innovation: Social construction of technology perspective, AD-minister No. 30.
   Google Scholar