References
- Adam, F., & Westlund, H. (2013). Innovation in socio-cultural context. London: Routdlege.
- Bijker, W. E. (1997). Of bicycles, bakelite and bulbs. Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Cavallini, S., et al. (2016). Using the Quadruple Helix approach to accelerate the transfer of research and innovation results to Regional Growthm. Technical Report of the European Union. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6e54c161-36a9-11e6-a825-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
- Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Vintage books.
- Etzkowitz, H. (1997). The Triple Helix: Academy-industry-government relations and the growth of neo-corporatist industrial policy in the U.S. In S. Campo dall’Orto (Ed.), Managing technological knowledge transfer (pp. 1–20). Bruxelles: EC Social Sciences COST A3, vol. 4, EC Directorate General, Science, Research and Development.
- Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages, in Research policy, 27, pp. 823–834.
- Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64–77. doi: 10.1504/IJTG.2004.004551
- Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2001). The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5, 4.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Viale, R. (2005). Third academic revolution: Polyvalent knowledge; the DNA of the Triple Helix, Relazione presentata al Convegno Triple Helix 5. The capitalization of knowledge: cognitive, economic, social & cultural aspect, Torino, 10–21 maggio.
- Flaschel, P. (2008). The macrodynamics of capitalism. Elements for a synthesis of Marx, Keynes and Schumpeter. Berlin: Springer.
- Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the simplex and the complex. New York: Freeman.
- Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
- Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Kaur Kapoor, K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2014). Rogers’ innovation adoption attributes: A systematic review and synthesis of existing research. Information Systems Management, 31, 74–91. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2014.854103
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Longlois, R. N. (2007). The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Schumpeter, chandler, and the new economy. London: Routdlege.
- Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University press.
- Metcalfe, J. S. (1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. London: Routdlege.
- Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press. E-book.
- Rogers, M. E. (1983). Diffusion of innovation. New York: The Free Press. (1962).
- Ruzzeddu, M. (2013). Green Energy. Placement Strategies and Boundaries: The case of Enalg. NUOVA ATLANTIDE, ISSN: 2037-7304.
- Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1980). The theory of economic development. London: Routledge.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (2010). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. La Vergne: Lightning Source Inc.
- Ziman, J. (1987). An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.