Variations on a theme: exploring understandings of the marketisation concept in civil society research

References

• Ackerman, J. M. (2014). Rethinking the international anti-corruption agenda: Civil society, human rights and democracy. American University International Law Review, 29(2), 293–333.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., Nank, R., & Stivers, C. (1999). Implications of welfare reform: Do nonprofit survival strategies threaten civil society? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764099284005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnå, E. (2006). Still a trustworthy ally? Civil society and the transformation of Scandinavian democracy. Journal of Civil Society, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680600730884
   Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. (2014). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aspers, P. (2011). Markets. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bajde, D. (2013). Marketized philanthropy: Kiva’s utopian ideology of entrepreneurial philanthropy. Marketing Theory, 13(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593112467265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baulderstone, J., & Earles, W. (2009). Changing relationships: How government funding models impact relationships between organisations. Third Sector Review, 15(2), 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, F. (2008). New players enter the game: Effects of marketization of social policies. German Policy Studies, 4(1), 107–130.
   Google Scholar
• Blessing, A. (2015). Public, private, or in-between? The legitimacy of social enterprises in the housing market. Voluntas, 26(1), 198–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9422-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. (1992). Civilization & capitalism: 15th-18th century (Vol. III). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, D., Cass, B., Himmelweit, S., & Szebehely, M. (2012). The marketisation of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712449772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, P., & Meyer, J. W. (2017). They are all organizations: The cultural roots of blurring between the nonprofit, business, and government sectors. Administration & Society, 49(7), 939–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714548268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2007). The future of sociology. Sociological Bulletin, 56(3), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920070301
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, B. G., & Ariovich, L. (2004). The sociology of property rights. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2002). Alternative conceptions of civil society. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. P., & Xiao, R. (2008). The Shanghai administrative reform in the last decade: More rationalisation and marketisation? China Report, 44(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/000944550804400302
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (2002). Values at work: employee participation meets market pressure at mondragon. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. (1988). The firm, the market and the law. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cortis, N. (2017). Access to philanthropic and commercial income among non-profit community service organisations. Voluntas, 28(2), 798–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9715-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, B. (2011). Contestability in human services markets. The Journal of Australian Political Economy (68), 213-239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin, N. (2001). In search of civil society. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2003). For-profit social ventures. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2(1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. E., & Sanders, M. L. (2010). Meaningful work? Nonprofit marketization and work/life imbalance in popular autobiographies of social entrepreneurship. Organization, 17(4), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410364198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (2014). Civil society. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and non-profit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 582–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009333686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the non-profit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshtain, J. B. (1999). A call to civil society. Society, 36(5), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert, B., & Evers, A. (2014). An ambiguous concept: On the meanings of co-production for health care users and user organizations? Voluntas, 25(2), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9345-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & Calder, R. (2015). Architecture of markets. In R. Scott, M. C. Buchmann, & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1-14). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2002). On being Nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2009). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1978). The bazaar economy: Information and search in peasant marketing. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 28–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(28), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grohs, S., Schneiders, K., & Heinze, R. G. (2015). Social entrepreneurship versus intrapreneurship in the German social welfare state: A study of old-age care and youth welfare services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(1), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013501234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K., Alcock, P., & Millar, R. (2012). Start up and sustainability: Marketisation and the social enterprise investment fund in England. Journal of Social Policy, 41(4), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279412000347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, L. S., Smith, S. R., & Zimmer, A. (2012). At the eve of convergence? Transformations of social service provision in Denmark, Germany, and the United States. Voluntas, 23(2), 458–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9221-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J. (2011). In the Triangle of civil society, Politics, and economy: Positioning Magazines of Nonprofit organizations. Voluntas, 22(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9141-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvenmark, J. (2016). Ideology, practice, and process? A review of the concept of managerialism in civil society studies. Voluntas, 27(6), 2833–2859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9605-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, (54), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, U., & Beyes, T. (2010). Strategizing in NPOs: A case study on the practice of organizational change between social mission and economic rationale. Voluntas, 21(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9108-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, T. B. (1999). The public sector in an in-between time: Searching for new public values. Public Administration, 77(3), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. (2003). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79(3), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00324
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. (2005). Commentary on Keane: ‘eleven theses on markets and civil society’. Journal of Civil Society, 1(1), 43–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680500166320
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S. (1999). The idea of civil society. In The Japan Foundation & The Center for Global Partnership (Eds.) Civil society: A new agenda for US Japan intellectual exchange. CPG.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (2005). Eleven theses on markets and civil society. Journal of Civil Society, 1(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680500166098
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (2009). Civil society: Definitions and approaches. In H. Anheier, S. Toepler, & R. List (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of civil society (pp. 461–464). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, P. & M. Murphy (2009). 'State and civil society in Ireland'. In D. Ó Broin & P. Kirby (Eds.), Power, Protest and democracy: civil society and the Irish State (pp. 143–49). A. & A. Farmar.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2015). Street-level struggles against marketisation: A case study of nonprofits in a South Korean workfare partnership programme. Critical Social Policy, 35(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018314563038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Certina, K. (2006). The market. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2-3), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406062702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschinsky, J. (1998). Challenging the third sector housing approach: The impact of federal policies (1980–1996). Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.1998.tb00414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. K. (2005a). Rethinking arts marketing in a changing cultural policy context. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 10(3), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.9
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. K. (2005b). When arts met marketing: Arts marketing theory embedded in romanticism. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630500411309
   Google Scholar
• Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2014). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: A systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014561796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, S., Moro, D., Teasdale, S., & Clifford, D. (2015). The marketisation of charities in England and Wales. Voluntas, 26(1), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9417-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A., Hongoro, C., & Broomberg, J. (1997). Improving the efficiency of district hospitals: Is contracting an option? Tropical Medicine & International Health, 2(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.1997.d01-239.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, J. K. H. (2002). From nationalization to marketization: Changing governance in Taiwan's higher-education system. Governance, 15(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. P. (2011). Civil society in the shadow of the Irish state. Irish Journal of Sociology, 19(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJS.19.2.11
   Google Scholar
• Ni, N., Chen, Q., Ding, S., & Wu, Z. (2017). Professionalization and cost efficiency of fundraising in charitable organizations: The case of charitable foundations in China. Voluntas, 28(2), 773–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9765-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickel, P. M., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). A critique of the discourse of marketized philanthropy. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(7), 974–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764208327670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouma, S., Boeckler, M., & Lindner, P. (2013). Extending the margins of marketization. Frontier regions and the making of agro-expert markets in northern Ghana. Geoforum, 48, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peci, A., Figale, J., & Sobral, F. (2011). The ‘invasion’ of manufactured civil society: Government–non-profit partnerships in a Brazilian state. Public Administration and Development, 31(5), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1944)
   Google Scholar
• Prouteau, L., & Tchernonog, V. (2015). Changes in the public funding of French voluntary associations: Evidence, prospects and challenges. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(2), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Quaranta, M., & Dotti Sani, G. M. (2016). The relationship between the civic engagement of parents and children: A cross-national analysis of 18 European countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(6), 1091–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016628677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, M. R. (2002). Reshaping the state from above, from within, from below: Implications for public health. Social Science & Medicine, 54(11), 1669–1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00334-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridder, H. G., Piening, E. P., & Baluch, A. M. (2012). The third way reconfigured: How and why nonprofit organizations are shifting their human resource management. Voluntas, 23(3), 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9219-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossel, C. (2016). Winning a battle but losing the war? Third sector and social policy in Latin America: The case of Uruguay. Voluntas, 27(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9569-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1993). The marketization of welfare: Changing non-profit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state. Social Service Review, 67(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/603963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, B. (2016). Against the cult(ure) of the entrepreneur for the non-profit sector. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2015.1130524
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. L. (2012). Theorizing non-profit organizations as contradictory enterprises: Understanding the inherent tensions of non-profit marketization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911423761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shier, M. L., & Handy, F. (2015). Social change efforts of direct service nonprofits: The role of funding and collaborations in shaping social innovations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2014.973623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, M., & Cheney, G. (2007). Marketization, participation, and communication within New Zealand retirement villages: A critical—rhetorical and discursive analysis. Discourse & Communication, 1(2), 191–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307076006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civil life. University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R. (2010). Hybridization and nonprofit organizations: The governance challenge. Policy and Society, 29(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2003).  Principles of economic sociology. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (2002). Toward a global civil society. Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. (2001). Democracy and association. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)
   Google Scholar
• Wijkström, F. (2011). ‘Charity speak and business talk’: The on-going (re)hybridization of civil society. In F. Wijkström & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Nordic civil society at a cross-roads: Transforming the popular movement tradition (pp. 25–55). Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willner, L. (2019). Organizational legitimacy and managerialism. Within social Justice Nonprofit organizations: An interest Divergence analysis. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1621654
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, A. (1999). Corporatism revisited—The legacy of history and the German non-profit sector. Voluntas, 10(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021439703650
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., & Dart, R. (1998). Charities doing commercial ventures: Societal and organizational implications. Trillium Foundation.
   Google Scholar