Publication Cover
International Review of Sociology
Revue Internationale de Sociologie
Volume 30, 2020 - Issue 3
354
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

40 years of Luhmann's legacy in the Anglophone academic community: a quantitative content analysis of Luhmannian research

ORCID Icon
Pages 469-495 | Received 12 Jun 2020, Accepted 10 Nov 2020, Published online: 08 Dec 2020

References

  • Adam, F., Bernik, I., & Rončević, B. (2005). A grand theory and a small social scientific community: Niklas Luhmann in Slovenia. Studies in East European Thought, 57(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-004-3984-9
  • Ahmed-Mohamed, K. (2011). Social work practice and contextual systemic intervention: Improbability of communication between social work and sociology. Journal of Social Work Practice, 25(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650530903549884
  • Albert, M., Kessler, O., & Stetter, S. (2008). On order and conflict: International relations and the ‘communicative turn’. Review of International Studies, 34(S1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508007791
  • Alexander, D., & Blum, V. (2016). Ecological economics: A Luhmannian analysis of integrated reporting. Ecological Economics, 129, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.020
  • Andersen, N. Å., & Stenner, P. (2019). Social immune mechanisms: Luhmann and potentialisation technologies. Theory, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419868768
  • Arnoldi, J. (2001). Niklas Luhmann:An introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051607
  • Artieri, G. B., & Gemini, L. (2019). Mass media and the web in the light of Luhmann’s media system. Current Sociology, 67(4), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119837542
  • Baralou, E., Wolf, P., & Meissner, J. O. (2012). Bright, excellent, ignored: The contribution of Luhmann's system theory and its problem of non-connectivity to academic management research. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 37(4), 289–308.
  • Barnett, A. (2017). Family law without lawyers – A systems theory perspective. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2017.1306355
  • Barton, J., Emery, M., Flood, R. L., Selsky, J. W., & Wolstenholme, E. (2004). A maturing of systems thinking? Evidence from three perspectives. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAA.0000013419.99623.f0
  • Becker, K. H., & Haunschild, A. (2003). The impact of boundaryless careers on organizational decision making: An analysis from the perspective of Luhmann's theory of social systems. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(5), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519032000080767
  • Bednarz Jr, J. (1984). Complexity and intersubjectivity: Towards the theory of Niklas Luhmann. Human Studies, 7(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02633645
  • Bergmans, A. (2008). Meaningful communication among experts and affected citizens on risk: Challenge or impossibility? Journal of Risk Research, 11(1/2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701797301
  • Bergthaller, H., & Schinko, C. (2011). Introduction: From national cultures to the semantics of modern society. Postmodern Studies, 45, 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042032583_002
  • Besio, C., & Pronzini, A. (2008). Niklas Luhmann as an empirical sociologist: Methodological implications of the system theory of society. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 15(2), 9–31.
  • Bette, K.-H. (2015). 사회의 스포츠: 니클라스 루만의 체계이론에 기초한 연구들 Systemtheorie und Sport: Studien auf der Grundlage der N. Luhmanns Systemtheorie (H.-S. Song & C. Lee, Trans.). Theorie Publishing. (Original work published in 1998).
  • Borch, C. (2011). Niklas Luhmann. Routledge.
  • Brans, M., & Rossbach, S. (1997). The autopoiesis of administrative systems: Niklas Luhmann on public administration and public policy. Public Administration, 75(3), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00068
  • Buzan, B., & Albert, M. (2010). Differentiation: A sociological approach to international relations theory. European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109350064
  • Chettiparamb, A. (2007). Dealing with complexity: An autopoietic view of the people's planning campaign, Kerala. Planning Theory & Practice, 8(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350701664655
  • Clam, J. (2000). System's sole constituent, the operation: Clarifying a central concept of Luhmannian theory. Acta Sociologica, 43(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016990050079680
  • Czarniawska, B. (2017). Bruno Latour and Niklas Luhmann as organization theorists. European Management Journal, 35(2), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.02.005
  • Farías, I. (2014). Virtual attractors, actual assemblages: How Luhmann’s theory of communication complements actor-network theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013484003
  • Feldpausch-Parker, A., Ragland, C., Melnick, L., Chaudhry, R., Hall, D., Peterson, T., Stephens, J. C., Wilson, E. (2013). Spreading the news on carbon capture and storage: A state-level comparison of us media. Environmental Communication, 7(3), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.807859
  • Ferreira, S. (2014). Sociological observations of the third sector through systems theory: An analytical proposal. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(6), 1671–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9469-7
  • Fuchs, S. (1988). Translation and introduction. In N. Luhmann, Tautology and paradox in the self-descriptions of modem society. Sociological Theory, 6(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/201911
  • Füllsack, M. (2012). Communication emerging? On simulating structural coupling in multiple contingency. Constructivist Foundations, 8(1), 103–110.
  • Gerim, G. (2017). A critical review of Luhmann’s social systems theory’s perspective on mass media and social media. The Journal of Humanity and Society, 7(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.12658/human.society.7.14.M0218
  • Gren, M., & Zierhofer, W. (2003). The unity of difference: A critical appraisal of Niklas Luhmann's theory of social systems in the context of corporeality and spatiality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(4), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35280
  • Guy, J. S. (2018). Niklas Luhmann before relational sociology: The cybernetics roots of systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(6), 856–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2523
  • Hejl, P. M. (2015). Explaining social systems without humans. Constructivist Foundations, 10(2), 189–192.
  • Henningsson, J. (2009). Fund managers as cultured observers. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 1(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554170910939946
  • Herting, S., & Stein, L. (2007). The evolution of Luhmann's systems theory with focus on the constructivist influence. International Journal of General Systems, 36(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070600899412
  • Hornung, B. R. (1998). Niklas Luhmann, 1927-1998. Obituary Written for the ISA. International Sociological Association Bulletin, 78–79. http://mgterp.freeyellow.com/academic/documents/luh-obit_rc51.pdf
  • Jacobs, J., & Van Assche, K. (2014). Understanding empirical boundaries: A systems-theoretical avenue in border studies. Geopolitics, 19(1), 182–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2013.830106
  • Johnson, M. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Beer's viable system model and Luhmann's communication theory: ‘Organizations’ from the perspective of meta-games. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(3), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2222
  • Jokisch, R. (2011). Why did luhmann's social systems theory find so little resonance in the United States of America? Postmodern Studies, 45, 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042032583_010
  • Jung, S.-H. (2013). 사회의 사회’라는 역설과 새로운 사회이론의 촉구 The paradox of “The society of society” and the call for a new social theory. Concept & Communication/개념과 소통, 11, 187–200.
  • Kieser, A., & Seidl, D. (2013). Communication-centered approaches in German management research: The influence of sociological and philosophical traditions. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912469940
  • Kim, D.-Y. (2016). 사회의 사회학 Sociology of society. Seoul, Korea: Gil.
  • King, M., & Thornhill, C. (2003). ‘Will the real Niklas Luhmann stand up, please’. A reply to John Mingers. The Sociological Review, 51(2), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.00419
  • la Cour, A., Vallentin, S., Højlund, H., Thyssen, O., & Rennison, B. (2007). Opening systems theory: A note on the recent special issue of organization. Organization, 14(6), 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407082267
  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems [Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie] (J. Bednarz Jr. & D. Baecker, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published in 1984).
  • Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of society, Vol I. [Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft] (R. Barrett, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published in 1997).
  • Messner, C. (2014). Introduction to special issue SI: Luhmann. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 27(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-013-9351-8
  • Mitchell, R. C. (2007). Grounded theory and autopoietic social systems: Are they methodologically compatible? Qualitative Sociology Review, 3(2), 105–118.
  • Moeller, H.-G. (2012). The radical Luhmann. Columbia University Press.
  • Morgner, C. (2014). The theory of love and the theory of society: Remarks on the oeuvre of Niklas Luhmann. International Sociology, 29(5), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580914544431
  • Morgner, C. (2018). Trust and society: Suggestions for further development of Niklas Luhmann's theory of trust. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 55(2), 232–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12191
  • Neisig, M. (2017). Transition in complex polycentric contexts: Trusting and multifunctional semantics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2450
  • Nobles, R., & Schiff, D. (2012). Using systems theory to study legal pluralism: What could be gained? Law & Society Review, 46(2), 265–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00489.x
  • Ocampo, S. P. (2016). Dyadism in the sociological foundations of Luhmann and Latour: Communication and association compared. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 155(1), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.155.133
  • Paul, A. T. (2001). Organizing Husserl: On the phenomenological foundations of Luhmann’s systems theory. Journal of Classical Sociology, 1(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687950122232594
  • Peetz, T. (2019). Neoliberalism or organizational economization? Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 19(3), 591–613.
  • Rasch, W. (2017). Niklas Luhmann. New German Critique, 44(3), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-4162310
  • Riese, J. (2011). Functions, communication, and perception of emotions in Luhmannian theory: Emotions as reflection resources of social systems. Soziale Systeme, 17(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2011-0104
  • Roth, S. (2013). Les deux angleterres et le continent: Anglophone sociology as The Guardian of old European semantics. Journal of Sociocybernetics, 9(1-2), 19–34.
  • Sapountzaki, K. (2010). Risk-reproduction cycles and risk positions in the social and geographical space. Journal of Risk Research, 13(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669871003629838
  • Schwanitz, D. (1995). Systems theory according to Niklas Luhmann: Its environment and conceptual strategies. Cultural Critique, 30(30), 137–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354435
  • Seidl, D., & Becker, K. H. (2006). Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems: Niklas Luhmann’s contribution to organization studies. Organization, 13(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406059635
  • Spaemann, R. (1990). Niklas Luhmanns Herausforderung der Philosophie. In N. Luhmann & R. Spaemann (Eds.), Paradigm lost: Über die ethische Reflxion der Moral (pp. 49–73). Suhrkamp.
  • Šubrt, J. (2019). Niklas Luhmann's system theory: A critical analysis. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 19(4), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-4-607-616
  • Teubner, G. (1989). How the law thinks: Toward a constructivist epistemology of law. Law & Society Review, 23(5), 727–757. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053760
  • Theis-Berglmair, A. M. (2013). Why organizational communication has not gained a foothold in German-speaking communication studies—Until now: An historical outline. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912470078
  • Tyulenev, S. (2009). Why (not) Luhmann? On the applicability of social systems theory to translation studies. Translation Studies, 2(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700902937706
  • Van Assche, K., & Verschraegen, G. (2008). The limits of planning: Niklas Luhmann's systems theory and the analysis of planning and planning ambitions. Planning Theory, 7(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208094824
  • Villadsen, K. (2011). Ambiguous citizenship: ‘Postmodern’ versus ‘modern’ welfare at the margins. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 12(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2011.621048
  • Viskovatoff, A. (1999). Foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29(4), 481–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319902900402

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.