Wicked problems and sociology: building a missing bridge through processual relationalism

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). Transcending general linear reality. Sociological Theory, 6, 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (2016). Processual sociology. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J., & Head, B. W. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: A typology and a contingency framework. Policy and Society, 36(3), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S., Asaria, M., & Stranges, S. (2020). COVID-19 and inequality: Are we all in this together? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 111(3), 415–416. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00351-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2015). The turn to problematization: Political implications of contrasting interpretive and poststructural adaptations. Open Journal of Political Science, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2015.51001
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2016). Problematizations in health policy. SAGE Open, 6(2), 215824401665398–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016653986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K., & Turnbull, N. (2020). Relational public administration: A synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1324–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1632921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner, K., Mueller, M., Pyka, A., Schlaile, M. P., & Urmetzer, S. (2020). Why we can’t go back to normal: 5 appeals for a sustainable post-pandemic economy. LSE Business Review. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/104371/
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, P. (2016). Ontological commitment. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter 2016 edition).
   Google Scholar
• Buys, R., & Marotta, V. (2021). Relational theories of encounters and the relational subject. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 42(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2020.1864968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences: An introduction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., & Wellstead, A. (2021). COVID-19: Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Design and Practice, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cambré, B., Marynissen, H., & Van Hootege, G. (2020). Corona is mean. It’s a wicked problem. Crisis Communications Network. https://pm.be/corona-is-a-wicked-problem/
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. Understanding complex systems. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, F. (2008). Relational thinking: A critique of co-deterministic theories of structure and agency. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, F. (2013). What is the direction of the ‘relational turn’? In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 163–185). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, F. (2018a). The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, F. (Ed.). (2018b). From the concept of ‘trans-action’ to a process-relational sociology. In The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology (pp. 499–519). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. ([1949] 1989). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey’s collected works: The later works 1925–1953 (Vol. 16, pp. 1–293). Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. (2018). Beyond leadership: A relational approach to organizational theory in education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1978). What is Sociology? Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, P., Flinders, M. V., Hay, C., & Wood, M. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-politics, depoliticization, and governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grint, K. (2010). Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: The role of leadership. In S. Brookes & K. Grint (Eds.), The new public leadership challenge (pp. 169–186). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2015). Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science. Public Understanding of Science, 24(4), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514559891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassoun, N. (2021). Against vaccine nationalism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(11), 773–774. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics? Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy, 3(2), 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüther, M., Grömling, M., Beznoska, M., & Demary, M. (2020). Corona crisis: Liquidity takes priority, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Kurzbericht, No. 21/2020. https://www.iwkoeln.de/en/studies/iw-kurzberichte/beitrag/michael-huether-michael-groemling-martin-beznoska-markus-demary-corona-crisis-liquidity-takes-priority-462685.html
   Google Scholar
• ILO. (2021). ILO monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work (7th ed.). International Labour Organization. Retrieved February 3, 2022, from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/briefingnote/wcms_767028.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020). A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620934692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. T., & Nexon, D. H. (1999). Relations before states. European Journal of International Relations, 5(3), 291–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. T., & Nexon, D. H. (2019). Reclaiming the social: Relationalism in anglophone international studies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(5), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1567460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasche, B. (2021). After COVID-19: What can we learn about wicked problem governance? Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100173
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. (2020). The ‘wicked problem ‘of the COVID-19 pandemic. Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies. https://www.iass-potsdam.de/en/blog/2020/04/wicked-problem-covid-19-pandemic
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, A. N. (2020). Strategies for solving wicked problems of true uncertainty: Tackling pandemics like Covid-19. Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department. https://wpad.iima.ac.in/assets/snippets/workingpaperpdf/12502768892020-04-03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, D. M. (2016). Practice theory and relationalism as the new constructivism. International Studies Quarterly, 60(3), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2021, March 11). Explainer-Activists, drug groups in waiver war over COVID- 19 shot patents. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-wto-vaccines-idCNL4N2L83S8
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 with agility, transparency, and participation: Wicked policy problems and new governance challenges. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgner, C. (2020). John Dewey and the notion of trans-action: A sociological reply on rethinking relations and social processes. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M., Douglas, S., Bos, A., & Klem, W. (2017). How to evaluate the governance of transboundary problems? Assessing a national counterterrorism strategy. Evaluation, 23(4), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389017733340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, S. F. (2017). A relational view of ontological security in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 61(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Y. (2016). A relational theory of world politics. International Studies Review, 18(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1977). Problem setting in policy research. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 235–251). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M., & White, S. (1977). Policy research: Belief and doubt. Policy Analysis, 3(1), 239–271.
   Google Scholar
• Remuzzi, A., & Remuzzi, G. (2020). COVID-19 and Italy: What next? The Lancet, 395(10231), 1225–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D., & Power, E. (2020). Housing policy and the COVID-19 pandemic: The importance of housing research during this health emergency. International Journal of Housing Policy, 20(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2020.1756599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine, 263, 113356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P. (2013). The politics of theory and the constitution of meaning. Sociological Theory, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113479933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selg, P. (2016a). Two faces of the “relational turn”. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096515001195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selg, P. (2016b). ‘The fable of the Bs’: Between substantialism and deep relational thinking about power. Journal of Political Power, 9(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2016.1191163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selg, P. (2018). Power and relational sociology. In F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology (pp. 539–557). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P. (2020). Causation is not everything: On constitution and trans-actional view of social science methodology. In C. Morgner (Ed.), John Dewey and the notion of trans-action. A sociological reply on rethinking relations and social processes (pp. 31–53). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P., & Ruutsoo, R. (2014). Teleological historical narrative as a strategy for constructing political antagonism: The example of the narrative of Estonia’s regaining of independence. Semiotica, 202, 365–393. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2014-0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selg, P., Sootla, G., & Klasche, B. (2022). A relational turn in governing wicked problems: From governance failure to failure governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P., & Ventsel, A. (2020). Introducing relational political analysis: Political semiotics as a theory and method. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, C.-Y. (2016). Affirmative balance of the Singapore-Taiwan relationship: A bilateral perspective on the relational turn in International relations. International Studies Review, 18(4), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viw024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., Greaves, L. M., Satherley, N., Wilson, M. S., Overall, N. C., Lee, C. H. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being. American Psychologist, 75(5), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, N., & Hoppe, R. (2019). Problematizing ‘wickedness’: A critique of the wicked problems concept, from philosophy to practice. Policy and Society, 38(2), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1488796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M., & Ospina, S. M. (2012). Advancing relational leadership research. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bueren, E., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, M., & Thompson, M. (Eds.). (2006). Clumsy solutions for a complex world: Governance, politics and plural perceptions. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Waddock, S., Meszoely, G. M., Waddell, S., & Dentoni, D. (2015). The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(6), 993–1012. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2014-0146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2007). Governance, complexity, and democratic participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 17–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006296208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1998). On constitution and causation in International relations. Review of International Studies, 24(5), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598001028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder-Smith, A., & Freedman, D. O. (2020). Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: Pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(2), taaa020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ylikoski, P. (2013). Causal and constitutive explanation compared. Erkenntnis, 78(S2), 277–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9513-9
   Google Scholar