Digital heritage politics from the perspective of relational sociology: the case of Nüshu culture in China

References

• Aigner, A. (2016). Heritage-making ‘from below’: The politics of exhibiting architectural heritage on the internet – a case study. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1107615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. C. (2011). Fact-signs and cultural sociology: How meaning-making liberates the social imagination. Thesis Eleven, 104(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513611398623
   Google Scholar
• Aria, M., Cristofano, M., & Maltese, S. (2014). Development challenges and shared heritage-making processes in southwest Ghana. In P. Basu, & M. Wayne (Eds.), Museum, heritage, and international development (pp. 150–169). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnall, G. (2003). Performance and performativity at heritage sites. Museum and Society, 1(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v1i2.17
   Google Scholar
• Bekus, N. (2019). Transnational circulation of cultural form: Multiple agencies of heritage making. International Journal of Heritage Studies. Advance online publication. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13527258.2019.1652922
   Google Scholar
• Bendix, R. F., Eggert, A., & Peselmann, A. (eds.). (2012). Heritage regimes and the state. Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, A. F. (1908). The process of government. A study of social pressures. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogardus, E. S. (1926/1927). Social distance between groups. Journal of Applied Sociology, 11, 473–479.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdeau, L., Gravari-Barbas, M., & Robinson, M. (Eds.) (2016). World heritage, tourism and identity: Inscription and co-production. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2017). On desmond: The limits of spontaneous sociology. Theory and Society, 46(4), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9294-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., Yang, J., & Cai, J. (Eds.) (2021). New approach to cultural heritage: Profiling discourse across borders. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I. (2020). Farming from a process-relational perspective: Making openings for change visible. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(2), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Marmol, C., Morell, M., & Chalcraft, J. (2014). The making of heritage: Seduction and disenchantment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, F. (2008). Relational thinking: A critique of co-deterministic theories of structure and agency. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43(5), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9232-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (2021). Lectures in China, 1919–1920. University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949/1989). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey; the later works 1925–1953 (Vol. 16: 1949–1952). University of Southern Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez, V. (1986). The marketing of heritage. American Ethnologist, 13(3), 546–555. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1986.13.3.02a00100
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2012). Relational sociology. A new paradigm for the social sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (1994). Welcome to cyberia: Notes on the anthropology of cyberculture [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 35(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1086/204266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff, J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1), 52–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607310839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groote, P., & Haartsen, T. (2008). The communication of heritage: Creating place identities. In B. Graham, & R. Howard (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity (pp. 181–194). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, R. E., & Barber, K. (2014). Ethnographic research in a cyber era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 306–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613497749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. (2010). What is heritage? In R. Harrison (Ed.), Understanding the politics of heritage (pp. 154–196). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage. Critical approaches. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. (2015). Beyond “natural” and “cultural” heritage: Toward an ontological politics of heritage in the Age of anthropocene. Heritage & Society, 8(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X15Z.00000000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. (2018). On heritage ontologies: Rethinking the material worlds of heritage. Anthropological Quarterly, 91(4), 1365–1383. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2018.0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., Bartolini, N., DeSilvey, C., Holtorf, C., Lyons, A., Macdonald, S., May, S., Morgan, J., & Penrose, S. (2016). Heritage futures. Archaeology International, 19, 68–72. http://doi.org/10.5334/ai.1912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, L., & Pink, S. (2014). New visualities and the digital wayfarer: Reconceptualizing camera phone photography and locative media. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157913505257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, T. E. (2019). The relational-turn in international relations theory: Bringing Chinese ideas into mainstream international relations scholarship. American Journal of Chinese Studies, 26(2), 91–106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45216266?seq=1
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1839).The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (Sir William Molesworth, ed.). John Bohn.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. T., & Nexon, D. H. (1999). Relations before states:. European Journal of International Relations, 5(3), 291–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. M., & Merriman, P. (2011). Practising architectures. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.565884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (1995). Cybersociety: Computer mediated communication and community. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, J. S. (2016). The cultural logic of heritage redevelopment mega-projects: The distillery district in toronto and cheonggyecheon in Seoul [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, F. (2000). Detour and access: Strategies of meaning in China and Greece. Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kavalski, E. (2016). Relationality and Its Chinese characteristics. The China Quarterly, 226, 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741016000606
   Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh, A. L., & Patterson, S. J. (2001). The impact of community computer networks on social capital and community involvement. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121957312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komito, L. (1998). The Net as a foraging society: Flexible communities. The Information Society, 14(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722498128908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriz, A., Gummesson, E., & Quazi, A. (2014). Methodology meets culture. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 14(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595813493265
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163?seq=1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2017). Trust and power (C. Morgner, & M. King, Eds.). Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Maags, C., & Svensson, M. (Eds.) (2018). Chinese heritage in the making: Experiences, negotiations and contestations. University of Amsterdam Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marren, P. (1990). Woodland heritage. David and Charles.
   Google Scholar
• Mattern, M. (1999). John dewey, art and public life. The Journal of Politics, 61(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, K. E., & Prideaux, B. (2011). Experiencing ‘natural’ heritage. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2010.492852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, S. (1989). Heritage management for heritage tourism. Tourism Management, 10(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(89)90030-7
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2001). The internet: An ethnographic approach. Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mische, A. (2014). Relational sociology, culture, and agency. In J. Scott, & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 80–97). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgner, C. (2018). The relational meaning-making of riots: Narrative logic and network performance of the London ‘riots.’. In F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology (pp. 579–600). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgner, C. (Ed.) (2019). John Dewey and the notion of trans-action. A sociological reply on rethinking relations and social processes. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgner, C. (Ed.) (2022). The making of meaning: From the individual to social order. Selections from niklas luhmann’s works on semantics and the social structure. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094565
   Google Scholar
• Muzaini, H., & Minca, C. (2018). After heritage: Critical perspectives on heritage from below. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nettleingham, D. (2018). Heritage work: The preservations and performances of thames sailing barges. Cultural Sociology, 12(3), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975518783380
   Google Scholar
• Noss, R. F. (1987). From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: A look at the nature conservancy (USA). Biological Conservation, 41(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(87)90045-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, A., Scott, M., & Redmond, D. (2016). Competing discourses of built heritage: Lay values in Irish conservation planning. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1121404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiang, G. (2016). Networks of social relations and underground economics: A study on a black market of bicycles in Shanghai. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2(3), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X16651774
   Google Scholar
• Reed, I., & Alexander, J. C. (2009). Social science as reading and performance. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (1996). Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1994). The virtual community: Connection in a computerised world. Secker and Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, I. J. M. (2008). Heritage from below: Class, social protest and resistance. In B. Graham, & R. Howard (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity (pp. 143–158). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., & Schulz, J. (2009). New avenues for sociological inquiry. Sociology, 43(4), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509105415
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D., & Saxena, G. (2019). Participative co-creation of archaeological heritage: Case insights on creative tourism in alentejo, Portugal. Annals of Tourism Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102790.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P. (2013). The politics of theory and the constitution of meaning. Sociological Theory, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113479933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selg, P. (2020). Causation is not everything: On constitution and trans-actional view of social science methodology. In C. Morgner (Ed.), John Dewey and the notion of trans-action. A sociological reply on rethinking relations and social processes (pp. 31–53). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P., Klasche, B., & Nõgisto, J. (2021). Wicked problems and sociology: Building a missing bridge through processual relationalism. International Review of Sociology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2022.2035909
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P., & Ventsel, A. (2020). Introducing relational political analysis: Political semiotics as a theory and method. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, C. (2017). The relational turn east and west from Chinese confucianism to balance of relationships. Korean Political Science Review, 51(6), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2017.51.6.005
   Google Scholar
• Shusterman, R. (2012). Thinking through the body: Essays in somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, H., & Blumenfield, T. (2013). Cultural heritage politics in China. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Skilton, N., Adams, M., & Gibbs, L. (2014). Conflict in common: Heritage-making in cape york. Australian Geographer, 45(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2014.899026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. (2012). Discourses of heritage: Implications for archaeological community practice. Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos. http://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/64148
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. (1994). Rights, relationality, and membership: Rethinking the making and meaning of citizenship. Law & Social Inquiry, 19(1), 63–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1994.tb00390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillman, L. (2020). What is cultural sociology? Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Truman, D. (1951). The governmental process. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, K. K. (2011). A theoretical framework of Guanxi dynamics (Chinese version). Chinese Journal of Sociology, 31(4), 96–115. https://www.society.shu.edu.cn/en/y2011/v31/i4/96
   Google Scholar
• Tzanelli, R. (2013). Heritage in the digital era: Cinematic tourism and the activist cause. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S.-L., & Rowlands, M. (Eds.) (2017). Making and unmaking heritage value in China. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waśkiewicz, A. (2010). Representation as social relation. In praise of georg simmel on the centenary of the publication of his essay ‘The stranger’. Polish Sociological Review, 171, 305–317. https://polish-sociological-review.eu/pdf-126768-54412?filename=Representation%20as%20Social.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (Eds.) (2013). Heritage and community engagement: Collaboration or contestation? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. (2007). Heritage-making and political identity. Journal of Social Archaeology, 7(3), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605307081400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., & Maags, C. (Eds.) (2020). Heritage politics in China: The power of the past. Routledge.
   Google Scholar