Publication Cover
International Review of Sociology
Revue Internationale de Sociologie
Volume 34, 2024 - Issue 1
405
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Reviving the sociology of organizations in higher education: the case of how global university rankings influence the strategic management of Canadian universities

ORCID Icon
Pages 90-109 | Received 20 Dec 2021, Accepted 25 Nov 2022, Published online: 07 Jan 2023

References

  • Adam, E. (2020). ‘Governments base performance-based funding on global rankings indicators’: A global trend in higher education finance or a global rankings literature fiction? A comparative analysis of four performance-based funding programs. International Journal of Educational Development, 76, 102197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102197
  • Adam, E. (2021). A study of the influence of global university rankings on institutional strategies, decision-making, and policy choice: The case of four Canadian research universities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. http://libaccess.mcmaster.ca/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/study-influence-global-university-rankings-on/docview/2610122532/se-2?accountid=12347
  • Adler, P., Du Gay, P., Morgan, G., & Reed, M. (2014). Introduction: Sociology, social theory, and organization studies, continuing engagements. In P. Adler, P. Du Gay, G. Morgan, & M. Reed (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociology, social theory, and organization studies: Contemporary currents (pp. 1–8). Oxford University Press.
  • Anteby, M. (2013). Manufacturing morals: The values of silence in business school education. University of Chicago Press.
  • Aurini, J. (2006). Crafting legitimation projects: An institutional analysis of private education businesses. Sociological Forum (Randolph, N.J.), 21(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-006-9004-8
  • Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2007). 2007 wallace foundation distinguished lecture: What makes education research “educational”? Educational Researcher, 36(9), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07312896
  • Barley, S. R. (2016). 60th anniversary essay: Ruminations on how we became a mystery house and how we might get out. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215624886
  • Bastedo, M. N. (2012). Organizing higher education: A manifesto. In M. N. Bastedo (Ed.), The organization of higher education: Managing colleges for a new era (pp. 3–17). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Besio, C., Du Gay, P., & Velarde, K. S. (2020). Disappearing organization? Reshaping the sociology of organizations. Current Sociology, 68(4), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120907613
  • Bleiklie, I. (2014). Comparing university organizations across boundaries. Higher Education, 67(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9683-z
  • Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 78–98). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n3
  • Cai, Y., & Mehari, Y. (2015). The use of institutional theory in higher education research. In J. Juisman, & T. Malcolm (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 1–25). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Calderon, A. (2018). The geopolitics of higher education: Pursuing success in an uncertain global environment. In B. Cantwell, H. Coates, & R. King (Eds.), Handbook on the politics of higher education (pp. 187–208). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
  • Christensen, T., Gornitzka, Å, & Ramirez, F. O. (2019). Universities as agencies. Reputation and professionalization. Palgrave Macmillan. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92713-8
  • Clark, B. R. (1960). The open-door college. University of California Press.
  • Clark, B. R. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393952
  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. University of California Press.
  • Clark, B. R. (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education Policy, 17(4), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300062
  • Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1986). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Davis, G. F. (2015). Editorial essay: What is organizational research for? Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215585725
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago University Press.
  • Douglass, J. A. (2016). How rankings came to determine world class. In J. A. Douglass (Ed.), The new flagship university: Changing the paradigm from global ranking to national relevancy (pp. 3–29). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Du Gay, P. (2020). Disappearing “formal organization”: How organization studies dissolved its “core object”, and what follows from this. Current Sociology, 68(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120907644
  • Elken, M., Stensaker, B., & Dedze, I. (2018). The painters behind the profile: The rise and functioning of communication departments in universities. Higher Education, 76(6), 1109–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0258-x
  • Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2016). Engines of anxiety: Academic rankings, reputation, and accountability. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Fumasoli, T., & Stensaker, B. (2013). Organizational studies in higher education: A reflection on historical themes and prospective trends. Higher Education Policy, 26(4), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2013.25
  • Global Affairs Canada. (2019). Building on success: International education strategy 2019–2024. Ottawa: Global Affairs Canada. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://www.international.gc.ca/education/assets/pdfs/ies-sei/Building-on-Success-International-Education-Strategy-2019-2024.pdf
  • Gonzales, L. D., Kanhai, D., & Hall, K. (2018). Reimagining organizational theory for the critical study of higher education. In M. B. Paulsen MB (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 505–559). Springer.
  • Government of Canada. (2019). Budget 2019: Investing in the middle class. Retrieved July 25, 2021, from https://budget.gc.ca/2019/docs/plan/toc-tdm-en.html
  • Government of Canada. (2020). Post-graduation work permit validity and application. Retrieved November 3, 2021, from https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/publications-manuals/operational-bulletins-manuals/temporary-residents/study-permits/post-graduation-work-permit-program/permit.html
  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, S., & C, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Grothe-Hammer, M., & Kohl, S. (2020). The decline of organizational sociology? An empirical analysis of research trends in leading journals across half a century. Current Sociology, 68(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120907627
  • Gumport, P. J. (2012). Strategic thinking in higher education research. In M. N. Bastedo (Ed.), The organization of higher education: Managing colleges for a new era (pp. 18–41). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446671
  • Hazelkorn, E. (2017). Introduction: The geopolitics of rankings. In E. Hazelkorn (Ed.), Global rankings and the geopolitics of higher education: Understanding the influence and impact of rankings on higher education, policy and society (pp. 1–20). Routledge.
  • Hazelkorn, E. (2021). Are rankings (still) fit for purpose? In H. van’t Land, A. Corcoran, & D. C. Iancu (Eds.), The promise of higher education: Essays in honor of 70 years of IAU (pp. 293–299). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67245-4_45
  • Jonker, L., & Hicks, M. (2016). The differentiation of the Ontario university system: Where are we now and where should we go? Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. https://heqco.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Report-The-Differentiation-of-the-Ontario-University-System.pdf
  • Kamens, K. H. (1977). Legitimating myths and education organizations: The relationship between organizational ideologies and formal structure. American Sociological Review, 42(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094601
  • Kerr, C. (2001). The gold and the blue: A personal memoir of the university of California, 1949-1967 political turmoil: Vol. 2. University of California Press.
  • King, B. G. (2017). The relevance of organizational sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 46(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306117692563
  • Kivistö, J., & Pekkola, E. (2017). Organizational studies, research in higher education. In P. N. Teixeira, & J. C. Shin (Eds.), International encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1–6). Springer.
  • Knight, J. (2015). International universities: Misunderstandings and emerging models? Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315572899
  • Kováts, G. (2018). The change of organizational structure of higher educations in Hungary: A contingency theory analysis. International Review of Social Research, 8(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/irsr-2018-0009
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
  • Maassen, P., Gornitzka, Å, & Fumasoli, T. (2017). University reform and institutional autonomy: A framework for analysing the living autonomy. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12129
  • Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2019). From organised anarchy to de-coupled bureaucracy: The transformation of university organisation. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(4), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12229
  • Mac Donald, H. (2018). The diversity delusion: How race and gender pandering corrupt the university and undermine our culture. St. Martin’s Press.
  • Manning, K. (2013). Organizational theory in higher education. Routledge.
  • Marginson, S. (2011a). Equity, status and freedom: A note on higher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.549456
  • Marginson, S. (2011b). The new world order in higher education: Research rankings, outcome measures and institutional classifications. In M. Rostan, & M. Vaira (Eds.), Questioning excellence in higher education: Policies, experience and challenges in national and comparative perspective (pp. 3–20). Sense Publishers.
  • Meyer, J. W. (1970). The charter: Conditions of diffuse socialization in schools. In W. R. Scott (Ed.), Social processes and social structures: An introduction to sociology (pp. 564–578). Rinehart and Winston.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: From structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer (Ed.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78–109). Jossey-Bass.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Sage.
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Milian, R. P., Davies, S., & Zarifa, D. (2016). Barriers to differentiation: Applying organizational studies to Ontario higher education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 46(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v46i1.186019
  • Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2008). Networks and institutions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 596–623). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Peterson, M. W. (1974). Organization and administration in higher education: Sociological and social-psychological perspectives. Review of Research in Education, 2(1), 296–347. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X002001296
  • Peterson, M. W. (1985). Emerging developments in postsecondary organization theory and research: Fragmentation or integration. Educational Researcher, 14(3), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X014003005
  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row.
  • Ramirez, F. O. (2006). The rationalization of the university. In M. L. Djelic, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 225–246). Cambridge University Press.
  • Sahlin, K. (2012). The interplay of organizing models in higher education. What room is there for collegiality in universities characterized by bounded autonomy? In B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa, & C. Sarrico (Eds.), Managing reforms in universities: The dynamics of culture, identity and organizational change (pp. 189–222). Routledge.
  • Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Scott, W. R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110644
  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Shattock, M. (2017). University governance in flux. The impact of external and internal pressures on the distribution of authority within British universities. A synoptic view. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(4), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12132
  • Sheil, T. (2016). Managing expectations: An Australian perspective on the impact and challenge of adopting a university rankings narrative. In M. Yudkevich, P. G. Altbach, & L. Rumbley (Eds.), The global academic rankings game: Changing institutional policy, practice, and academic life (pp. 12–37). Routledge.
  • Skolnik, M. (2013). An historical perspective on the idea of institutional diversity and differentiation in Ontario higher education. College Quarterly, 16(2), 1–11. Retrieved July 20, 2021, from http://collegequarterly.ca/2013-vol16-num02-spring/skolnik.html
  • Snowdon, K. (2018). Canada’s universities: Cost pressures, business models, and financial sustainability – Updated 2018. Ottawa: The Canadian Association of University Business Officers. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://www.caubo.ca/latest-news/canadas-universities-cost-pressures-business-models-and-financial-sustainability-an-update/
  • Stack, M. (2016). Global university rankings and the mediatization of higher education. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Statistics Canada. (2018). Financial information of universities and degree-granting colleges, 2016/2017. Version updated July 2018. Retrieved April 25, 2021, from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/180724/dq180724a-eng.htm
  • Statistics Canada. (2021a). Table 37-10-0026-01 Revenues of universities and degree-granting colleges (x 1,000). Retrieved April 25, 2021, from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid = 3710002601
  • Statistics Canada. (2021b). Table 37-10-0086-01 Postsecondary enrolments, by status of student in Canada, country of citizenship and gender. Retrieved May 1, 2021, from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid = 3710008601
  • Stensaker, B., Lee, J. J., Rhoades, G., Ghosh, S., Castiello-Gutiérrez, S., Vance, G., Çalıkoğlu, A., Kramer, V., Liu, S., Marei, M. S., O’Toole, L., Pavlyutkin, I., & Peel, C. (2018). Stratified university strategies: The shaping of institutional legitimacy in a global perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(4), 539–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1513306
  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill.
  • Toma, J. D. (2012). Institutional strategy positioning for prestige. In M. N. Bastedo (Ed.), The organization of higher education: Managing colleges for a new era (pp. 118–159). Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Trow, M. (1962). The democratization of higher education in America. European Journal of Sociology, 3(2), 231–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600000618
  • Weber, M. (2009). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. W. W. Norton & Co.
  • Weber, M., Wittich, C., & Roth, G. (2013). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
  • Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
  • Wilson, J. K. (2008). Patriotic correctness: Academic freedom and its enemies. Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.