A Reappraisal of the EU’s Expanding Readmission System

References

• Anderson, B. “Migration, Immigration Controls and the Fashioning of Precarious Workers”. Work Employment & Society 24, no. 2 (2010): 300–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouteillet-Paquet, D. “Passing the Buck: A Critical Analysis of the Readmission Policy Implemented by the European Union and Its Member States”. European Journal of Migration and Law 5, no. 3 (2003): 359–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campesi, G. The Arab Spring and the Crisis of the European Border Regime: Manufacturing Emergency in the Lampedusa Crisis, EUI Working Papers, RSCAS 2011/59. Florence: European University Institute, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Carens, J. H. “An Overview of the Ethics of Immigration”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17, no. 5 (2014): 538–59.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera, S., and R. Hernández i Sagrera. “Mobility Partnerships: ‘Insecurity Partnerships’ for Policy Coherence and Migrant Workers’ Human Rights in the EU”. In Multilayered Migration Governance: The Promise of Partnership, edited by R. Kunz, S. Lavenex and M. Panizzon: 97–115. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cassarino, J.-P., ed. Unbalanced Reciprocities: Cooperation on Readmission in the Euro-Mediterranean Area. Washington, DC: The Middle East Institute, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cassarino, J.-P. Readmission Policy in the European Union. Brussels: European Parliament, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cassarino, J.-P. “Informalising Readmission Agreements in the EU Neighbourhood”. The International Spectator 42, no. 2 (2007): 179–96.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, S. “Guestworkers in Europe: A Resurrection?” International Migration Review 40, no. 4 (2006): 741–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, C. Accords de réadmission et respect des droits de l’homme dans les pays tiersBilan et perspectives pour le Parlement Européen. Brussels: European Parliament, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cholewinski, R. “International Labour Law and the Protection of Migrant Workers: Revitalizing the Agenda in the Era of Globalization”. In Globalization and the Future of Labour Law, edited by J. D. R. Craig and S. M. Lynk: 409–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, N. European Readmission Policy: Third Country Interests and Refugee Rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. The Governance of Labour Market Uncertainty: Towards a New Research Agenda, Discussion Paper 2008–08. Amsterdam: Hugo Sinzheimer Institute, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. P. “Migrant ‘Illegality’ and Deportability in Everyday Life”. Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (2002): 419–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., M. L. Clark and G. McKenzie. “Subject and System in International Interaction”. International Organization 43, no. 3 (1989): 475–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. On Circular Migration and Mobility Partnerships between the European Union and Third Countries, COM (2007) 248 final. Brussels, 16 May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Community Return Policy on Illegal Residents, COM (2002) 564 final. Brussels, 14 October 2002.
   Google Scholar
• European Migration Network. Temporary and Circular Migration: Empirical Evidence, Current Policy Practice and Future Options in EU Member States. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hailbronner, K. “Readmission Agreements and the Obligation of States under Public International Law to Readmit their Own and Foreign Nationals”. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 57, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. “Reciprocity in International Relations”. International Organization 40 (1986): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., and R. Stucky. “Partnering for Migration in EU External Relations”. In Multilayered Migration Governance: The Promise of Partnership, edited by R. Kunz, S. Lavenex and M. Panizzon: 116–42. London: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., and F. Schimmelfennig. “EU Rules beyond EU Borders: Theorizing External Governance in European Politics”. Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 6 (2009): 791–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letourneux, V. Precarious Employment and Working Conditions in Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. “System as Difference”. Organization 13, no. 1 (2006): 37–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Managing Labor Migration: Temporary Worker Programs for the 21st Century. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Michie, J., and M. Sheehan. “Labour Market Deregulation, ‘Flexibility’ and Innovation”. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27, no. 1 (2003): 123–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll, G. “Readmission Agreements”. In Immigration and Asylum: From 1900 to present, edited by M. J. Gibney, and R. Hansen: 495–97. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Observatoire Suisse du Droit d’Asile et des Etrangers. Le Regroupement familial et les limitations au droit à la vie familiale. Bern: ODAE, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Panizzon, M. “Readmission Agreements of EU Member States: A Case for EU Subsidiarity or Dualism?” Refugee Survey Quarterly 31, no. 4 (2012): 101–33.
   Google Scholar
• Peers, S., E. Guild, D. Acosta Arcarazo, K. Groenendijk and V. Moreno-Lax, eds. EU Immigration and Asylum Law (Text and Commentary): Second Revised Edition, Vol. 2: EU Immigration and Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, G., and J. Rodgers. Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. Geneva: International Labour Organisation, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. “Opportunity Costs: The True Price of Internships”. Dissent (Winter 2013): 41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Snidal, D. “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation”. American Political Science Review 85, no. 3 (1991): 701–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, G. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thornley, C., S. Jefferys, and B. Appay, eds. Globalization and Precarious Forms of Production and Employment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Trauner, F., and I. Kruse. EC Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements: Implementing a New EU Security Approach in the Neighbourhood, CEPS Working Document no. 290. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Triandafyllidou, A., ed. Circular Migration between Europe and its Neighbourhood: Choice or Necessity? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. “Deportation, Expulsion, and the International Police of Aliens”. Citizenship Studies 6, no. 3 (2002): 265–92.
   Google Scholar
• Wickramasekara, P. Circular Migration: A Triple Win or a Dead End? Geneva: International Labour Organisation, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wihtol de Wenden, C. La question migratoire au XXIe siècle : Migrants, réfugiés et relations internationales. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. “The Politics of Negotiating EU Readmission Agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey”. European Journal of Migration and Law 16, no. 1 (2014): 69–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar