Diversity Management in World Politics. Reformist China and the Future of the (Liberal) Order

References

• Acharya, A. The End of the American World Order. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Badie, B. Un monde sans souveraineté. Les Etats entre ruse et responsabilité. Paris: Fayard, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, M., and F. Li. “China’s Place in Global and Regional Governance: A New World Comes into View”. Global Policy 7, no. 4 (2016): 491–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biscop, S. The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European Characteristics, Egmont Security Policy Brief 75. Brussels: Egmont – Royal Institute for International Affairs, June 2016: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bremmer, I., and N. Roubini. “G-Zero World. The New Economic Club Will Produce Conflict, Not Cooperation”. Foreign Affairs 90, no. 2 (March/April 2011): 2–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. “China’s Global Goals and Roles: Changing the World from Second Place?” Asian Affairs 47, no. 1 (2016): 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, H. The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. “China, the European Union and the Fragile World Order”. Journal of Common Market Studies 54, no. 4 (2016): 775–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T.J. The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power. New York: Norton, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, A. La disunità del mondo. Dopo il secolo globale. Milan: Feltrinelli, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Y. “Can China Save the Global Order?”. Project Syndicate, March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, T. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. European Union Global Strategy 2016, Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. June 2016 https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/global-strategy-foreign-and-security-policy-european-union.
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T. “The Coming Multi-Order World”. Contemporary Security Policy 37, no. 1 (2016): 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabusi, G. “The Reports of My Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated: China and the Developmental State 25 Years After Governing the Market”. The Pacific Review 30, no. 2 (2016): 232–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haass, R. A World in Disarray. American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. London: Penguin, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hampson, F., and P. Heinbecker. “The ‘New’ Multilateralism of the Twenty-First Century”. Global Governance 17, no. 3 (2011): 299–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilmann, S., M. Rudolf, M. Huotari, and J. Buckow. “China’s Shadow Foreign Policy: Parallel Structures Challenge the Established International Order”. China Monitor 18 (October 2014): 28.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, A.R. “Concerts as a Mode of Ordering in World Politics: An Ideal Type Approach”. In Great Power Multilateralism and War Prevention: Concert or Contest, edited by H. Müller and C. Rauch. Abingdon: Routledge, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. “Brazil: What Kind of Rising State in What Kind of Institutional Order”. In Rising States, Rising Institutions, edited by A.S. Alexandroff, and A.F. Cooper: 128–50. Waterloo and Washington: Centre for International Governance Innovation and Brookings Institution Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. “Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-Be Great Powers?” International Affairs 82, no. 1 (2006): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G.J. “The Plot against American Foreign Policy. Can the Liberal Order Survive?”. Foreign Affairs 96, no. 3 (May/June 2017): 2–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G.J. Liberal Leviathan. The Origins, Crisis and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G.J. “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order”. Perspectives on Politics 7, no. 1 (2009): 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G.J. “Constitutional Politics in International Relations”. European Journal of International Relations 4, no. 2 (1998): 147–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G.J., and D.J. Lim. China’s Emerging Institutional Statecraft. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the Prospects for Counter-hegemony, Project on International Order and Strategy. Washington: Brookings Institution, April 2017. https://www.brookings.edu/research/chinas-emerging-institutional-statecraft/
   Google Scholar
• Jentleson, B.W. “America’s Global Role after Bush”. Survival 49, no. 3 (2007): 179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A.I. Social States. China in International Institutions, 1989-2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. The Return of History and the End of Dreams. New York: Knopf, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. Of Paradise and Power. America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Knopf, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S.D. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Kynge, J. “Finance will Create New Alliances across Asia”. Financial Times, Special Report Asia Infrastructure and Trade, 4 May 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kynge, J. “China readies lending firepower”. Financial Times, Special Report Asia Infrastructure and Trade, 4 May 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, R. “Out of the Bretton Woods. How the AIIB is different”. Foreign Affairs, Snapshot, July 27 2015, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2015-07-27/out-bretton-woods.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, W.R. “The Return of Geopolitics. The Revenge of the Revisionist Powers”. Foreign Affairs 93, no. 3 (May/June 2014): 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J.J. “Back to the future. Instability in Europe after the Cold war”. International Security 15, no. 1 (1990): 5–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J.J., and S.M. Walt. “The Case for Offshore Balancing. A Superior US Grand Strategy”. Foreign Affairs 95, no. 4 (July/August 2016): 70–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel, P. “Redistribution and Recognition: What Emerging Regional Powers Want”. Review of International Studies 36 (2010): 951–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J.S. “Will the Liberal Order Survive?”. Foreign Affairs 96, no. 1 (January/February 2017): 10–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, S.M. “Trump and World Order. The Return of Self-Help”. Foreign Affairs 96, no. 2 (March/April 2017): 52–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, B.R. Restraint. A Foundation for US Grand Strategy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B.R. “Emerging Multipolarity: Why Should We Care?” Current History (November 2009): 347–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smith, C. “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions”. International Organization 51, no. 4 (1997): 555–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. “Russia, China and a Multipolar World Order: The Danger of the Undefined”. Asian Perspectives 33, no. 1 (2009): 159–84.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. Post-American World and the Rise of the Rest. New York: Norton & Company, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, K. “China’s Rise and Its Discursive Power Strategy”. Chinese Political Science Review, 2016.
   Google Scholar