References
- Bergsten, C. F. 1996. Competitive liberalization and global free trade: a vision for the early 21st century. IIE Working paper No. WP96-15. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
- Blenkinsop, P. 2016. U.S. trade talks in deep freeze after Trump win, says EU. Reuters, 11 November. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-eu-trade-idUSKBN1361UN.
- Burlyuk, O. 2017. The “Oops!” of EU engagement abroad: Analyzing unintended consequences of EU external action. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (5): 1009–1025.
- CEPR. 2013. Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment: An Economic Assessment. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
- Coremans, E. 2017. From access to documents to consumption of information: the European Commission transparency policy for the TTIP negotiations. Politics and Governance 5 (3): 29–39.
- Corporate Europe Observatory. 2013. Leaked European Commission PR strategy: ‘Communicating on TTIP’. Corporate Europe. 23 Nov. http://corporateeurope.org/trade/2013/11/leaked-european-commission-pr-strategy-communicating-ttip.
- Crisp, J. 2014. US multinational could sue EU governments through CETA, Euractiv, 20 November. https://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/news/us-multinationals-could-sue-eu-governments-through-ceta/.
- De Ville, F. 2012. European Union regulatory politics in the shadow of the WTO: WTO rules as frame of reference and rhetorical device. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (5): 700–718.
- De Ville, F. and Siles-Brügge, G. 2015. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the role of computable general equilibrium modelling: an exercise in ‘managing fictional expectations’. New Political Economy 20 (5): 653–678.
- De Ville, F. and Siles-Brügge, G. 2016. TTIP: The Truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- De Ville, F. and Siles-Brügge, G. 2017. Why TTIP is a game-changer and its critics have a point. Journal of European Public Policy 24 (10): 1491–1505.
- De Wilde, P. and Zürn, M. 2012. Can the politicization of European integration be reversed? Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (1): 137–153.
- Diependaele, L., De Ville, F. and Sterckx, S. 2017. Assessing the normative legitimacy of investment arbitration: The EU’s Investment Court System. New Political Economy. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1417362.
- Dür, A. 2010. Protection for Exporters: Power and Discrimination in Transatlantic Trade Relations, 1930-2010. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- European Commission. 2013a. Statement from United States President Barack Obama, European Council President Herman Van Rompuy and European Commission President José Manuel Barroso. Brussels/Washington, 13 February. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-94_en.htm.
- European Commission. 2013b. European Commission Staff Working Document: impact assessment report on the future of EU–US trade relations. SWD(2013) 68 final. Brussels.
- European Commission. 2013c. European Union and United States to launch negotiations for a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Memo. Brussels, 13 February. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-95_en.htm.
- European Commission. 2015. Trade for all: Towards a more responsible trade and investment policy. Brussels. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/october/tradoc_153846.pdf
- European Commission. 2016. European Commission Publishes Report on State of Play of TTIP Negotiations. Brussels, 27 April. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1488.
- Fritz, T. 2016. CETA and TTIP: Potential Impacts on Health and Social Services. Working paper. Brussels: European Federation of Public Service Unions. http://www.epsu.org/sites/default/files/article/files/Working%20Paper_HSS%20in%20CETA%2BTTIP_1604.pdf.
- Gardner, A. 2014. Turkey Presses for TTIP Role. European Voice, 7 March. http://www.politico.eu/article/turkey-presses-for-ttip-role/.
- Gheyle, N. 2016. Adding fuel to the flames: How TTIP reinvigorated the politicization of trade. Paper presented at the conference ‘Social and Labour Impacts of Free Trade Agrements’. Brussels, 7–8 July.
- Gheyle, N. and De Ville, F. 2017, forthcoming. How Much Is Enough? Explaining the Continuous Transparency Conflict in TTIP. Politics and Governance 5 (3).
- Global Justice Now. 2015. CETA: TTIP’s Little Brother: A Guide to the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada. http://www.s2bnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/ceta-ttip-little-brother-global-justice-now.pdf.
- International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD). 2015. EU, Mexico eye trade deal upgrade. Bridges 19 (7).
- Magnette, P. 2017. Quand l’Europe déraille. Waterloo: Luc Pire.
- Meunier, S. 2005. Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Raza, W., Grumiller, J., Taylor, L., Tröster, B. and von Arnim, R. 2014. Assess TTIP: assessing the claimed benefits of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Vienna: Austrian Foundation for Development Research. www.oefse.at/fileadmin/content/Downloads/Publikationen/Policynote/PN10_ASSESS_TTIP.pdf
- Reuters. 2014. Turkey eyes EU customs union as U.S. trade talks progress. 15 May. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/15/us-usa-trade-turkey-idUSBREA4E0XB20140515.
- Sinan, Ü. 2014. Locked in or Left out? Transatlantic Trade beyond Brussels and Washington. Brussels: Carnegie Europe.
- Young, A.R. 2017. The New Politics of Trade: Lessons from TTIP. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing.
- Young, A.R. and Peterson, J. 2006. The EU and the new trade politics. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6): 795–814.